What are /r/remoteviewing's favorite Products & Services?

From 3.5 billion Reddit comments

The short answer is - yes it is possible! There are many viewers out there including me who look into lottery numbers. It's more like a direct perception of numbers using remote viewing and other related techniques. The major issue in viewing numbers is the belief system that it's not possible to do so. Somehow, the collective unconscious is trained to think that numbers are hard or at least very different from pictures. A simple inception " numbers are also images" can do a lot of improvements. Nevertheless, it might take a lot of practice, probably months or even years to reach this level and that is one of th major reasons that we do not have substantial evidence in such cases. The same argument holds good for alphanumeric passwords as such.

In this book Debra and John Knowles speak about it on many levels. https://www.amazon.com/dp/B098KLC3Q9/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_glt_8CXPNM87G0ZTNS6N60YV

One of the best remote viewers the CIA ever used (according to Kit Green) wrote a book called Inner Visions of Matter and Subtle Energy in which she did exactly this. The first part of the book is for the layman, then she works with an actual physicist to describe the properties of what she is seeing: Inner Visions of Matter and Subtle Energy https://www.amazon.com/dp/097687007X/

I know people have mixed feelings about the Farsight Institute on this sub, but they have some pretty extensive free training on their website: https://farsight.org/SRV/

Also, CRV - Controlled Remote Viewing by Daz Smith is quite in depth as well.

>Has anyone managed to attain a decent level of skill? If so how long did it take you and what resources did you use to learn it?

No I am not a good remote viewer yet, but I am practicing where I can and I have some success here and there. I've been doing this for a few months. I've had a lot of distractions in my life (sweetie dealing with medical stuff) so it's been very spotty working on it. Probably could have gone faster if that wasn't the case.

​

>How has remote viewing improved your life, do you think it was a good thing to invest time and energy into learning this?

Yeah it's been worth it for sure. I am pretty empathic and been experiencing precog stuff my whole life, and my materialistic enculturation wasn't doing me any favors in terms of me feeling sane and being able to deal with all of this. RV practice has helped me start learning to separate out what's "mine" and what comes from elsewhere. Plus it's just kinda fun. I play RV Tournament "bass ackwards" now just for lulz. I set the intention to pick the wrong image every time and so far this month I'm at 0 correct, batting 1000!

>Lastly do you need an 'interviewer' or can you attain a high skill level alone?

Having a real life person to set targets for you helps A LOT but you can totally do it just with online target pools. There's also people in this sub that set targets for practice so you could try that out too.

>Please recommend some books or yt channels or apps to learn this from. Ty.

I personally really like Paul H. Smith's books - this is a good one

Also just google around for video interviews with any of the old military guys - Paul H. Smith, Joe McMoneagle, Lyn Buchanan etc. - they're all great.

This book: [Dogs that Know When Their Owners Are Coming Home] talks about psychic dogs. (https://www.amazon.com/Dogs-That-Their-Owners-Coming/dp/0307885968). Also this death-sensing cat.

Looks good! Here's a link for Google Podcasts also

Here is one that specifically involved Ingo Swann

They are existing "submitted" studies from the 1970s. I don't know what's throwing you off. The links are in green. There is a literal reference section.

Here just take them:

1974 – Nature Vol. 251 – Information transmission under conditions of sensory shielding – Harold Puthoff, Russell Targ

1976 – IEEE – Perceptual Channel for Information Transfer over Kilometer Distances: Historical Perspective and Recent Research – Harold Puthoff, Russell Targ

I have by no means mastered the skill, but I like Paul H. Smith and I’d recommend his book - The Essential Guide to Remote Viewing: The Secret Military Remote Perception Skill Anyone Can Learn https://www.amazon.com/dp/1938815017/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_glt_fabc_41Z5GHQ34CB9HWNK8HJF

He does teach in person courses and I’ll be looking into that after COVID is done.

I read this book and it unlocked a lot for me https://www.amazon.com/21-Rituals-Ignite-Your-Intuition/dp/1786781964

I did all the rituals and it helped me remote view pretty well, as well as increased my ability to control what I dream, and I can connect to friends from afar, such as meditating about someone and then getting them to text me a minute later.

Just watched. He makes a good point, but years of research show that ARV has a statistically above-average chance of working - and that is enough to make money IF you run your project well and use proper money management techniques. The book, 'Associative Remote Viewing' by Debra Lyn Katz and Jon Knowles goes into ARV in depth and will provide much better insights than I can here on reddit.

However, just seconds after your video mark, Courtney claims the reason that ARV is bad is, "remote viewing works on intention and the intention of the viewer is to satisfy the desires and needs of the tasker - and the tasker has, in their mind, BOTH images".

But that's the advice that Courtney himself doesn't take - the leopard ate his face. Courtney has in his mind that we are on a Prison Planet and that there are factions of aliens fighting against us, each other and for us, depending on the alien species. THIS is why his viewers get the data that they do. They are trying to satisfy the desires of his mind and intention and his is clouded with pre-conceived notions.

If I had a team of remote viewers doing ARV to find out if Team A wins over Team B and I personally desire and want and hope and think that Team A is the better team....guess which team the viewers are going to pick to win?

In general terms, expand your knowledge base. Look at how things work. Look at how technical and engineering drawing work, to describe objects (the last is a big subject, but there is a short cut below).

In Hella's case, she was given a course on nuclear reactors, joined a public tour for one, got comfortable with the subject matter.

On particular book gets a lot of attention "Drawing on the right side of the brain". Particularly good for improving sketching a mental image.

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Drawing-Right-Brain-Betty-Edwards/dp/0006381146

Español: He escrito un libro sobre telekinesis, electrokinesis, visión extraocular, visión remota y psiónica. Hay muy poco material sobre estos temas en castellano, así que me he animado a compartir la investigación que he llevado a cabo durante casi 20 años. De momento solo está en EPUB pero pronto sacaré una edición física. También planteo traducirlo a inglés.

https://www.amazon.es/dp/B0B5M134YM/

English: I have written a book on telekinesis, electrokinesis, extraocular vision (mind sight), remote viewing and psionics. There is very little material on these subjects in Spanish, so I have been encouraged to share the research I have been doing for almost 20 years. At the moment it is only in EPUB but soon I will release a physical edition. I also plan to translate it into English.

Paul H. Smith - Essential Guide to Remote Viewing

He's extremely level headed and gives a great introduction to RV, history and protocol, from the ex-military perspective.

Yes, these in for editions.
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Star-Gate-Archives-Government-Parapsychological/dp/1476667527/ref=sr\_1\_1?crid=2J45D27VXTDAL&keywords=remote+viewing%2C+star+gate&qid=1642115403&sprefix=remote+viewing+star+gate%2Caps%2C75&sr=8-1

In addition to other posts pointing out the extreme bias of Wiki against psi, to those who are skeptical that remote viewing is real, here is Volume 1 of four detailing the history of the 20-year, 20-million dollar US government sponsored remote viewing program. Contrary to the CIA and Robert Gates, the program did achieve positive results in operational work. These volumes are the definitive history of the research behind those results.
https://www.amazon.com/Star-Gate-Archives-Government-Sponsored/dp/147667527

if still curious, reverse image search showed it's a photo of coral reefs off the coast of Egypt, photographed by a German lady looks like.
https://pixabay.com/photos/coral-reefs-sea-egypt-reefs-5970427/

>!This is off topic, but...I looked at target and got the wrong city in NM during a Google search. But look at this cool anomaly in Mesquite! https://www.bing.com/maps/streetside/?&amp;cp=32.070881~-106.617534&amp;lvl=17&amp;dir=99.3&amp;mo=om.1~z.2.06&amp;style=x&amp;q=344%2BOtero%2BSt%2C%2BMesquite%2C%2BNM%2B88048!<

I've had this recently after playing with artbreeder.com a whole lot. Similar to the Tetris effect I think. Do you think it might be something like that?

I'm a born procrastinator and have ADHD. I used to get paralyzed by a blank page. But you know what works? Feeling like I'm answering a person's question, like having a conversation. I can somehow then pour out paragraphs and paragraphs.

Maybe you know what I mean, today? You're a lightning quick writer, and you know this stuff backwards and forwards. Maybe you don't need to type it, maybe you need to be interviewed about it or feed someone questions to ask you. Dictate. Let technology or a service transcribe.

Otter.ai has some free hours of transcription monthly. Could be worth a try.

On the subject of "Lateral Thinking", a popular concept in the 70s, apparently. I found this book in a thrift store in New Orleans. Highly recommended for strengthening the brain to operate more creatively. I have never been great a remote viewing, and haven't read a lot of Russell Targ's books, but I have read this. https://www.amazon.com/Lateral-Thinking-Creativity-Step/dp/0060903252

There's a great book which looks at the factors influencing probability of people experiencing the "anomalous".

https://www.amazon.co.uk/H-I-S-S-S-P-Understanding-Anomalously-CouponWith/dp/0929915291

I found this because David Ritchie was interviewed by Mishlove.

It finds many factors including neurodivergence, personality type and trauma.

Very good book on the whole area;- https://www.amazon.com/Associative-Remote-Viewing-Predicting-Outcomes-ebook/dp/B098KLC3Q9/ref=sr\_1\_1?dchild=1&amp;keywords=debra+jon+knowles&amp;qid=1628965637&amp;sr=8-1

Pru was starting TransDimensional Systems at this point and admitted in Intentions: The Intergalactic Bathroom Enlightenment Guide (2002) that she pretty much threw Brown under the bus in an attempt to distance herself - a former student of Brown - from the controversy surrounding the Hale Bopp fiasco.

That said, I take anything Farsight does with an enormous grain of salt. I feel that Brown gives much too much weight to the RV data he gets from his team.

|RV monitoring is what I eventually would like to do, so this also gives me a chance to practice.|

Ah, Mel Riley got a look at the draft of this book and had input into the final release of it;-

https://www.amazon.com/Monitoring-Remote-Viewing-Professional-Intuitive/dp/0999428918

Amazon Prime

I had to go to the video description to check that it's set for a theta wave frequency. Honestly, if it works for you, it works. Great. If not, then download an app for your phone that has presets. You can change the frequencies to what you like best and what gets you the best results.

On Android I use BrainWaves and it's been great.

It's a good point – but why then:

• can you search "RemoteView" and find the app &quot;RemoteView for Android&quot;

• are there a bunch of TeamViewer apps on the Play Store

There's a whole book on it.
https://www.amazon.com/Voices-Cosmos-C-B-Scott-Jones-ebook/dp/B00MR4E20Q/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1506455037&amp;sr=8-1&amp;keywords=voices+from+the+cosmos

The beings specifically on Earth are the Oranges (miners, underground), Angels (extradimensional, assists humans in need), Elementals (extradimensional, responsible for Akashic Records, fulfills human wishes), and some others that are more closer to humans. &nbsp;

They're actually pretty cool. They're not dumb though. They know of humanity's weaknesses, hypocrisies. So while they're sympathetic, it's really up to humans to solve human problems.