There is, like this network card for example https://www.amazon.com/XG-C100C-Network-Adapter-Single-RJ-45/dp/B072N84DG6 and https://www.ubnt.com/edgemax/edgerouter-infinity/
Stuff is pretty expensive but the fact that there is now a market for it will help lower the prices etc
Here is a translated article written by a journalist who knew Breivik in school. He seems to agree with the sentiment that Breivik is not deranged
You should check out Naomi Klein's The Shock Doctrine - it has a chapter (or two) on General Pinochet and details Chicago-style economic policy implementation attempts in various countries.
What? He's a commie and antisemite?!
/s
From the article --
' Stalin's brutal rule devastated Ukraine. His forced collectivization of farming brought a famine in 1932–33, and up to 7 million Ukrainians died, mostly in the country's east. Ukrainians call that tragedy the Holodomor, meaning "extermination by hunger." Stalin later repopulated the east and the adjoining Crimean peninsula with Russians. '
A good book that deals with this is The Harvest of Sorrow: Soviet Collectivisation and the Terror-Famine' by Robert Conquest.
'What’s the real history?' the article's subtitle asks? Unfortunately, in this article that sets out to go into 'the real history', there is no mention of the fact that Ukraine (and Byelorussia too) were founding members of the United Nations. This was really a farce to give Stalin's USSR more votes in UN, but the UN (the voice of the world community') recognized the Ukrainian SSR and the Byellorusiian SSR as independent states, each with their own votes -- so there must have been recognized boundaries for them.
Coincidentally, they always voted along with the USSR.
The powerful are the deluded ones. Thinking these actions will be taken lying down is ridiculous. http://www.instructables.com/id/Guillotine/ It's amazing how much this has been searched. Well, it's not that surprising.
Good point, there are so many people in the US that feel military intervention will not work that none of my "cherry picked" comments provide a representative example of how people feel. In fact, it's like there are so many people who oppose military action that we've almost completely changed America's policy of wanton bombing in a handful of different countries! As I stated earlier, I personally don't feel my comments were "cherry picked." I see these kinds of comments ubiquitously on ISIS news articles across the spectrum. If you would like to link to a mainstream news ISIS article with lots of reasonable comments most of which oppose military intervention, by all means feel free to link to that article here.
Because, as bluntly said by former US President Jimmy Carter, the US is an "oligarchy with unlimited political bribery."
What the American people want and what our evil government actually does is often two very different things.
>>Was the Russian government or that the Russian government hack us... Like everyone else does?
>I'm really not sure what you're trying to say here
The place the maleware came from was Ukraine. We already know that the Russians hack us; it's been common knowledge since the Cold War. So the question I'm making here is: was it only the Russians who were hacking us with definitive proof that it was only them or do we know from past experience that it was probably the Russians, but could have also been a lot of different people.
>I'm done arguing about the disclaimer, it's such a ridiculous thing to latch onto to try and make your argument hold that the document and all it's details shouldn't be taken seriously.
What's ridiculous is that you haven't acknowledged that Obama provoked WWIII over allegations with bits and pieces of evidence... That don't even have a Russian connection since it came from an outdated malware from Ukraine.
>"He has large stores of sarin, mustard, and VX biological and chemical weapons" true
The stores we found weren't being used by Sadaam.