What is Reddit's opinion of
Reuters?
From 3.5 billion Reddit comments
➔ Reuters website
By popularity on Reddit, this Service is:
100 reviews of this app found across Reddit:
(Edited in cause people asked for source: http://reuters.com/article/idUSKCN0WS09E)
This is such a big case of news site making stuff up for clicks.
Guy gets murdered/robbed. Some tabloid "reporter" sees this, sees that he works in a field vaguely related to radiation and isotopes.
So we get headlines that say "guard at nuclear facility shot dead and his security pass stolen" implying that he was on duty at the time, and just completely pulling the fact that the pass got stolen out of their ass. In the body of the article, they throw in details about terrorism and Brussels. They've hit all the buzzwords this week about terrorism and fearmongering, instant front page story.
Fucking liars. Ima try and find the initial report so I can ignore anything that outlet says for the rest of my life.
Edit: First english language source I can find from 9 hours ago, fuck them. "Targeted by terrorists" my ass
First source I can find is La Derniére Huere, a 110 year old daily paper apparently. Well they just lost all credibitilty from me, and they appear to have taken down the initial story. (Someone who speaks languages back me up here cause Im just looking for cognates on their website)
I just looked into it some more, the same paper (and I assume the same authors) also made up the background story that this nuclear facility was being targeted by terrorists weeks ago.
BBC never reported on this at all which confirms that theyre probably the best big name news source out there
Except obesity decreases bone mass and puts a lot of harmful stress on the skeletal system and is significantly correlated with osteoporosis and joint replacement surgery... :\ It's a nice thought, though
http://reuters.com/article/idUSCOL85335320070528?irpc=932
http://www.lbjs.net/pdf/KHWDrMakkWeb.pdf
Edit: In response to the mean pms I am getting, I would like to clarify that I am 100% for being comfortable and confident with your own body and obviously everyone should be afforded the same respect and everything regardless of how they look. Is it my job to police random strangers lifestyle? Absolutely not. I'm just saying acting like obesity is only important on a superficial "skin deep" level is dismissive of a medical issue which claims the lives of millions each year.
>Most leaders don't like that sort of thing.
Except, bizarrely, Philippines "President" Duterte:
Philippines' Duterte likens himself to Hitler, wants to kill millions of drug users
Kinda funny. Turkey has been there since 2014, deployed a base for training of the Iraqi army. Couple weeks later, Iraq pledges for an increasing military cooperation. As such, they initiate an increasing cooperation in phases. As part the various phases, Turkey will increase troops to train the Iraq army. So Turkey initiated the follow up phase, exactly as agreed.
Didn't they already do that?
Edit: >L.L. Bean scrambled to distance itself from Linda Bean's donations, noting that she was one of more than 50 members of the founding family associated with the 105-year-old company, which described itself as politically neutral.
>"Our owners, employees, and customers hold views and embrace causes that are individual and diverse," the company said in a statement late on Sunday. "We fully acknowledge and respect that some may disagree with the political views of a single member of our 10-person board of directors."
Those sources conflict with others, sometimes even with their own publications. I looked up employment for refugees in Germany and found these:
In related news from Saturday,
>In a statement from his jail cell in northwest Turkey, Demirtas called for the HDP to prepare "a plan to fight for democracy and peace" in the face of a "political purge".
>"We are experiencing the virtual shutdown of all democratic political channels," he said in a statement read out at the congress to applause from delegates.
>"But whatever happens ... the HDP will not abandon democratic politics, it will insist on non-violent methods to find a solution to political problems," he said.
Article summary:
>* BERLIN, July 3 (Reuters) - Germany's lower house of parliament approved on Thursday the introduction of a nationwide minimum wage of 8.50 euros per hour, one of the flagship reforms of Chancellor Angela Merkel's coalition partner, the centre-left Social Democrats.
>* Of the 601 votes cast, 535 voted in favour of the law, 5 lawmakers voted against it and 61 abstained, according to a deputy leader of the Bundestag.
>* The reform still needs to get approval from the Bundesrat upper house to become law. (Reporting by Annika Breidthardt; Editing by Noah Barkin)
^I'm ^a ^bot, ^v2. ^This ^is ^not ^a ^replacement ^for ^reading ^the <strong>^original ^article</strong>^! ^Report ^problems ^here^.
^Learn ^how ^it ^works: ^Bit ^of ^News
Here is a non-mobile link: http://reuters.com/article/idUSBREA2D1MO20140314
^Sourcecode ^| ^Feedback?
Sanctions generally consist of preventing mutually beneficial transactions between people/entities in the sender country and their counterparts in the target. The closer the integration, the greater the potential impact from sanctions. This means that the EU is more or less in the driver seat- they can have the biggest impact, but will also suffer most of the costs.
Since sanctions will hurt both parties, the goal can't just be "hurt the target as much as you can", but rather "hurt the target and minimize how much I hurt myself." Thus is why financial sanctions are popular- western capital markets dwarf those of typical targets, so cutting them off hurts them much more than the senders.
I wouldn't interpret Russia's energy exports strictly as leverage. Yes, Russia supplies natural gas and Europe would certainly have to reduce consumption or dip into their stocks if Russia cut off the tap. (I'm not sure how plentiful these stocks are or which countries have them, just that "Europe" has "more than usual.") The other side is that Russia is more or less built on energy exports. Fuels account for some 2/3 of their exports and revenue from fuels supplies 50% of federal revenue (source). And Russia can't instantly start selling gas to other markets for the same reason Europe can't instantly buy US gas- the LNG infrastructure isn't there (that and the need for a permit on the US side). All in all, I'm not sure which side comes out less hurt if the fossil fuel trade is seriously impacted.
In terms of the prospects of sanctions, what do you think the goal is? I suspect that Crimea is more or less lost. But in terms of preventing further expansion, I think sanctions could very well hold the line.
Here's an article from The Daily Beast that's actually longer and much more detailed than OP's, in case anyone wants more info.
I had no trouble reading it on my phone, but it does have quite a few ads.
Edit: Here's a link to Reuters' coverage of the study. It's much less detailed but is politically neutral and has almost no ads, if that's what you're looking for.
For anyone who wants to read the study themselves (and has access to academic publications through their school or work) here's a direct link to the research. It's not free, but that's the original source.
Article summary:
>* Western sanctions against Russia over the Ukraine crisis are choking economic growth, weakening the rouble and isolating the market from foreign funding.
>* Siluanov's comments highlight a battle among different factions of the government over defense spending which has heated up in recent months, and which will ultimately be resolved by Putin himself.
>* "When we were adopting the defense program, the forecasts for the economy and budget revenues were completely different.
^I'm ^a ^bot, ^v2. ^This ^is ^not ^a ^replacement ^for ^reading ^the <strong>^original ^article</strong>^! ^Report ^problems ^here^.
^Learn ^how ^it ^works: ^Bit ^of ^News
Here is a non-mobile link: http://reuters.com/article/idUSKBN0O20CE20150517?irpc=932
^Sourcecode ^| ^Feedback?
His first lawyer was gay. He pressured the guy to 'out' himself, so he'd be less anxious.
It's in The Art of the Deal.'
Trump also changed his own pageant rules to allow transgendered folks to attend:
Church choir sings the MAGA song they wrote. Pyongyang indeed.
http://reuters.com/video/2017/07/04/church-choir-sings-make-america-great-ag?videoId=372020970
Edit: Different from Pyongyang in that they are not being forced to sing and no mass games.
Here is a non-mobile link: http://reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSKBN0P40EO20150705?irpc=932
^Sourcecode ^| ^Feedback?
Here is a non-mobile link: http://reuters.com/article/idUSKBN0JX0R620141219?irpc=932
^Sourcecode ^| ^Feedback?
"Adverse events" =/= "errors". This also includes (and is predominated by) infections that result during a hospital stay. To characterize all infections as hospital errors is spurious at best.
Should be obvious to anyone to take whatever steps to prevent having a hospital stay in the first place; but once you're there, it is where sick people tend to congregate and infections do happen. And it's only going to get worse as antibiotic resistant bacteria continue to develop due to overprescription of antibiotics.
Here is a non-mobile link: http://reuters.com/article/idUSKBN0GW1IX20140901?irpc=932
Pesticide use and efficient food production to feed a growing world are both big issues. Unfortunately under the current administration the EPA is unlikely to ban this nationwide so it is up to the states. The EPA is too busy rolling back pesticide regulations on things harmful to people.
National
Hil-dog says she will use executive actions to push gun control if elected President. I'm sure everyone already knew where she stood regarding gun control but wow, she's really going all in on this one.
Here is a non-mobile link: http://reuters.com/article/idUSL6N0VG1AI20150206?irpc=932
^Sourcecode ^| ^Feedback?
When was the apartment sterilized? Because it wasn't yet on Thursday.
Oh, here's an interview for today, Friday:
http://reuters.com/article/idUSKCN0HP2F720141003?irpc=932
>"This is something we expect to get resolved today," said Dr. Thomas Frieden, director of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, when asked about the delays in cordoning off and cleaning the site.
People have been dooming about that poll that showed that like high approval for Trump and his actions during the riots among republicans, and I remember it was at like 63% for Trump and 61% for Cruz. But that's actually astonishingly low republican approval for Trump, who has always enjoyed sky high republican approval - and Cruz is popular among most conservatives too, so there's not much to that one. More importantly, Hawley was at only like 46% approval.
But there's more.
>This decline in Trump’s support among the Republican elite has been accompanied by some erosion in his backing among GOP voters. In a Politico–Morning Consult poll taken after the Capitol Hill riot, 75 percent of Republican voters said they approved of the job Trump is doing, down from 83 percent in December. A Reuters–Ipsos survey taken during the same period put Trump’s GOP support at 70 percent, an all-time low, and 18 points beneath the peak he’d reached in August.
Not only that, we've got polls for the 2024 GOP primary that we can compare to november - Trump went from 54% to 42%, and Pence went from 12% to 16%, Romney's stock rose, Jr's stock fell, and Hawley wasn't even there.
Like the pace of it or not, these are the trendlines we want to see.
Plenty there for ya to read about your accepting and loving brethren!
If ever there was a telling story about the military industrial complex this is it.
They make military budgets cuts of $807M and "we" increase aid ~~by~~ to around $3B a year.
Edit: misread the article
edit2: This was in 2014. The actual increase was around $700M from the previous agreement
Here is a non-mobile link: http://reuters.com/article/idUSL6N0U61KU20141222?irpc=932
^Sourcecode ^| ^Feedback?
What do you think the leak to CNBC yesterday was for?
However, another leaker came out and directly contradicted them soon after
Until this board fight gets resolved the price shouldn't move much.
Reuters' War College Podcast had a great episode a couple of weeks ago regarding the issue revolving around paramilitary militias in the US that if anyone is interested on the subject should take a listen.
Here is a non-mobile link: http://reuters.com/article/idUSKBN0OY14S20150618?irpc=932
^Sourcecode ^| ^Feedback?
Well, there's one. It didn't take that long to find either. Also, the post office brought in a profits before 2006, when Congress passed a law requiring them to fund the next 75 years worth of Healthcare for their retiring employees by 2016 ($5.5 billion a year). That's a huge expense they were burdened with, but even still they do come fairly close to breaking even. Couple that with the fact that Congress tends to meddle with the post office to keep them from competing with private corporations in any meaningful way and it's no surprise they don't make money.
Here is a non-mobile link: http://reuters.com/article/idUSKBN0FS1V920140723?irpc=932
Here is a non-mobile link: http://reuters.com/article/idUSL5N10T2OW20150818
^Sourcecode ^| ^Feedback?
Very much this. Trump could give secrets away to the Russians (oh, wait, he already did,) but as long as he makes it possible to pass their bills, the GOP would rather find ways to blame things on Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and Sid the Science Kid.
There was an article this morning on Reuters about LGBT life in Uganda. So it's still hitting the news and life is still just as bad.
The article was about a forthcoming lawsuit to try and make involuntary anal probes by police who suspect someone is gay, illegal.
Here's the link http://reuters.com/article/idUSKBN12X0WJ
Bloomberg.com -financial focus but has other news as well
International Aljazeera is also surprisingly good. It's always good to have multiple sources. IMO one of them should be Aljazeera to give you other than western perspective. AJ sometimes has really good documentaries, they had a really good one on financial crisis.
Those 1 million Iraqis who died as a direct and indirect result of an illegitimate war definitely gave a shit about your infidel ass halfway across the world.
http://reuters.com/article/idUSKCN1182OJ
The major points are in the Reuters article, the rest are just explanations as to why and how the deal was reached and what they think will happen and how this deal effects the negotiations. They also hope the rebels will cooperate. It's really long to translate, sorry for the brief summary.
http://reuters.com/article/idUSKCN0VI0IJ
updates article - 5 min old.
was scared, it's 20km from my fam. - nobody was in it, we don't know anyone who was in it... the trains were probably full with commuters going to Rosenheim and to Munich in the other direction.
http://reuters.com/article/idUSKCN0PY0AU20150724?irpc=932
"ANKARA (Reuters) - Turkish fighter jets pounded Islamic State targets in Syria early on Friday, the prime minister's office said, after Turkey said it would take any "necessary measures" to protect itself from Islamist and Kurdish militant attacks.
Police, backed by helicopters and special forces, also launched overnight raids on more than 100 suspected Islamic State and Kurdish militant locations in Istanbul, according to media reports. Some 5,000 officers were deployed in the operation."
Because it's not a trend. Attacks on mosques, churches, and synagogues in Israel, West Bank, and Golan totaled 43 in total over the past 7 years if I remember right. Hardly a trend. You get more attacks on Jews in the United States in 3 months.
Edit: Past 6 years, not 7. Evidently my memory is not too shabby. In short, hardly a trend at all. And not all of the attacks are by Jews, I should note, that's total hate crimes.
Bp wouldn't touch it because it's crap. Here's an excellent piece on why the oil under Gatwick story is nonsense, and reflects ignorance on the part of the press and public more than anything else:
Americans actually have a mixed rating with most tourists destinations.
While their fellow tourists may not like them most locals appreciate the attempts to speak the local language(regardless of how bad they may be at it) as well as their very generous spending habits
Here is a non-mobile link: http://reuters.com/article/article/idUSL6N0SC1UA20141017?irpc=932
^Sourcecode ^| ^Feedback?
Here is a non-mobile link: http://reuters.com/article/idUSKCN0HJ21V20140924?im
^Sourcecode ^| ^Feedback?
Because it's sourcing the transcript from Trump's interview with Reuters. I'm not saying it is or isn't reliable, but people should really do their research and fact check everything they read, no matter the source.
TIL
>Under 2014 guidance from the Obama administration, someone would be a deportation priority for gang activity only if they had been convicted of an offence in connection with the gang, not for gang affiliation alone, although there was room for discretion on the part of immigration officials. Reuters could not determine whether gang members who had not committed crimes were deported during Obama's tenure.
Edit: from article's source http://reuters.com/article/idUSKBN15T307
Special Report: Class Struggle - How charter schools get students they want -- reuters
Charter schools as they're currently run are part of the problem.
Not a lot, just a few. They don't want to be called traitors for exposing the double standards for Jews, and it's not easy since Israelis are a bit wary of it given how many Arabs attack them daily. Sad that there is racism at all, but it isn't rampant thankfully, like in Palestine.
Here is a non-mobile link: http://reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSKBN0P40EO20150705?irpc=932
^Sourcecode ^| ^Feedback?
Here is a non-mobile link: http://reuters.com/article/idUSKBN0OW2H620150616
^Sourcecode ^| ^Feedback?
Here is a non-mobile link: http://reuters.com/article/idUSKBN0LZ2CT20150304
^Sourcecode ^| ^Feedback?
Here is a non-mobile link: http://reuters.com/article/idUSKBN0L81V020150204?irpc=932
^Sourcecode ^| ^Feedback?
Well it was fucking stupid to arm anyone in Syria. Although they may not have been directly arming ISIS, there was no way to control where the weapons actually ended up. And as soon as Libya fell under NATO bombing, 1000's of tons of weapons starting to be shipped from Libya to Syrian "rebels".
I thought it was Orrin Hatch who called Garland "a consensus nominee" who he would support.
Did McConnell make a similar comment?
I was wondering how in the hell you can find 151 out 161 immigrants with criminal records on random raids. Same article explains how.
>people convicted of traffic misdemeanors
"By the time of the White House briefing, Iraqi officials, human rights investigators and the United Nations had collected evidence of scores of executions, the torture of hundreds of men and teenagers, and the disappearance of more than 700 others."
Dude...
http://reuters.com/article/idUSKCN0YA2XV
http://www.breitbart.com/radio/2016/05/21/klukowski-trump-scotus-list-conservative-goldmine/
This was like three months ago. Pretty explicit.
Also, yeah, he laid out his economic plan today. Very job-creating heavy. (Note: "pro-life" relates to stopping abortion. It's a liberal narrative that it's about helping all people so that you're turned away from your actual goal. Stopping abortion is stopping murder.)
what "gravy train" is he shutting off for Latinos already in this country exactly?
perhaps you're referring to his company's efforts to import 1,000+ migrant workers?. Not sure how that would affect those polled though.
Here is a non-mobile link: http://reuters.com/article/idUSB4N0ZP00720150715?irpc=932
^Sourcecode ^| ^Feedback?
Here is a non-mobile link: http://reuters.com/article/idUSKBN0OR2UM20150611?irpc=932
^Sourcecode ^| ^Feedback?
Here is a non-mobile link: http://reuters.com/article/idUSKBN0OH2NW20150601?irpc=932
^Sourcecode ^| ^Feedback?
It's the estimated lifetime cost for the system. Seems like a new way to grab a big number and shit on the plane. I can't seem to find the metric being used to evaluate a new plane before but my searches have been limited to Google.
There's been more proof than that. Tell me exactly what sort of 'proof' you'd like to see?
BTW have you read this report from yesterday? It's by the fascist Zio-Nazi Illuminati Reuters though, so I'm not sure if it's reliable...
> A Roman Catholic grammar school located near Boston has pulled out of the city's St. Patrick's Day parade in protest over organizers' decision to allow a gay veterans group to march in next month's event.
Here is a non-mobile link: http://reuters.com/article/idUSKBN0IH29M20141028?irpc=932
^Sourcecode ^| ^Feedback?
Here is a non-mobile link: http://reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSKCN0HP2F720140930?irpc=932
^Sourcecode ^| ^Feedback?
Sigh. As it was foretold, it has come to pass. Check out the idiocy in these comments.
Edit: the three earliest ones are the money shot.
This article failed to mention that of the 161 detained in SoCal, only ten did not have criminal records. Or, "Only five of 161 people arrested in Southern California would not have been enforcement priorities under the Obama administration"
>US military officials told Reuters that Trump approved his first covert counterterrorism operation without sufficient intelligence, ground support or adequate backup preparations.
>As a result, three officials said, the attacking SEAL team found itself dropping onto a reinforced al Qaeda base defended by landmines, snipers, and a larger than expected contingent of heavily armed Islamist extremists.
Hell, in 1990 the Trump Organization was $4 billion in debt, with nearly a $1 billion guaranteed by Donald Trump personally to 72 different banks. And he didn't even know he was on the verge of bankruptcy - the banks figured it out. His business survived thanks to a combination bailout / deferment by those banks so that he wouldn't declare bankruptcy and leave them holding the bag.
Art of the spin: Trump bankers question his portrayal of financial comeback
> Veloso, Rio's police chief, said police investigations had shown that the swimmers had broken a mirror and a soap-holder in the bathroom, adding that they then handed over a total of 100 reais ($31) and $20 in U.S. currency as compensation.
Sources told Reuters. Reuters doesn't publish stuff like that if the sources were unreliable.
But sure, go ahead, assume Daily Mail is part of the right-wing conspiracy because they echo a reputable news agency.
I get that, but it's not true. Every step we take is a positive action toward reclaiming autonomy and control over our private lives. At the very least, it's a demonstration. It's civil disobedience against spy powers run amok over what should have been our protection against this very thing.
Who exactly are they working for anyway if it's not us? They kept Heartbleed secret for years, directly and knowingly endangering secure banking, medical records, and other supposedly secure transactions. That behavior is exactly the opposite of their mandate.
Also in America, they were unable to prevent the hack of OPM, the worst hack in our history, where fingerprints, SSN's, family interviews, and much more were stolen for 21.5 million people. An unbelievable cache of identity theft treasure and a serious violation of the public trust.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Office_of_Personnel_Management_data_breach
http://reuters.com/article/idUSKCN0T62K420151117
What is Big Brother doing if they're not protecting us? So far, all we know is they're collecting and storing as much data about us as possible. Newly developing software is able to do amazing things to sort and filter that data. The more of it we're able to keep in the hands of the voters, the more power we'll have to retake some of the control of the mechanisms of government.
Edit: Another benefit to the public at large making use of privacy tools is that it aids in their development. Especially with FLOSS, the more exposure and use a program or tool sees, the better its development and the more robust its community.
>The ~~government~~ FSA/rebels that used chemical weapons on civilians?
Fixed that for you.
Yes.
Here's a Reuters summary that includes the being turned away.
And here's an article from The Guardian back when they were supposed to meet in March.
Funny how it goes from Assange and Ecuador being happy to cooperate with the Swedes in March, to still refusing to meet with prosecuters in August.
Here is a non-mobile link: http://reuters.com/article/idUSKBN0KL28L20150113?irpc=932
^Sourcecode ^| ^Feedback?
Article summary:
>* In July, they told Obama's aides that Havana was prepared to release 53 prisoners, the officials said.
>* The U.S. officials said they would pressure communist-ruled Cuba to release more prisoners.
>* But the White House will provide the names of all 53 to Congress and expects lawmakers to make them public, the officials added.
^I'm ^a ^bot, ^v2. ^This ^is ^not ^a ^replacement ^for ^reading ^the <strong>^original ^article</strong>^! ^Report ^problems ^here^.
^Learn ^how ^it ^works: ^Bit ^of ^News
Here is a non-mobile link: http://reuters.com/article/idUSKBN0KE1P220150105?irpc=932
^Sourcecode ^| ^Feedback?
Here is a non-mobile link: http://reuters.com/article/idUSKCN0HU0V720141005?irpc=932
^Sourcecode ^| ^Feedback?
People will still deny it. The paratroopers who were captured earlier didn't walk across the boarder, they were riding in some sort of armored column. In addition, to multiple reports of an Russian armored column destroyed near snizhnye with 100 dead and 300 wounded.
This is one of the first conflicts that social media is actually playing a major role. The rebels have been using Hamas type media tactics. Don't report on your own losses, get international media to homes that have been shelled. Another thing working in their favor is the fact that both sides use the same weapons and vehicles. The Russian column that was destroyed could easily be portrayed as Ukrainian. Think about it, rebels can wander up to destroyed vehicles and take pictures and post them on the internet and literally have no idea they were on their side
Hi there! I have detected a mobile link in your comment.
Got a question or see an error? PM us.
http://bloomberg.com/news/2014-08-29/tesla-signs-deal-with-china-unicom-on-charging-points.html
Well you did say this: >Okay, which human rights have been violated by the US government?
But since you're asking about Trump, he has also been accused of violating human rights in a variety of ways. The UN commissioner on human rights said just the other day that the detention of immigrant children is a violation of human rights.
Also the travel ban was a violation of international law.
The attempt to expel Trans service members is also a violation of human rights, due to discrimination on the basis of gender.
He has also advocated for the use of torture and for killing the families of terrorists, both of which are war crimes.
Is that enough evidence?
More evidence of the Jewish state assisting the Islamic state in Syria from just the last few weeks:
http://reuters.com/article/mideast-crisis-syria-israel-idUKKCN0ZK0P1
Hushed up and always purposefully misreported. Like you said, just imagine if it went the other way.
Poverty isn't a death sentence in America? You're kidding right? It absolutely is. Including 45k who die every year from insufficient healthcare.
Here's a 2011 HuffPost piece on the topic. I think you'll enjoy the author.
They're starting to have problems in other jurisdictions.
Plus, having unlicensed, underinsured people driving strangers around will probably result in the taxpayer/insurance payer bearing the costs of accidents sooner or later.
Having said that, I feel technology like this is unstoppable and will persist no matter what the government does.
Here is a non-mobile link: http://reuters.com/article/idUSKCN0Q91PV20150804?irpc=932
^Sourcecode ^| ^Feedback?
The UN has influence in Kosovo, which is not a member state of the United Nations.
The Vatican is not a member, but participates (without voting) in UN discussions.
Taiwan's claim over islands conflicting with Chinese claims is being investigated by the United Nations.
The UN can do many things if it so chooses, especially because Palestinian offenses/violations do affect a member state. It simply chooses not to.
>...the smell of high-calorie foods “might also trigger craving and possibly lead to overconsumption for those individuals prone to weight gain.”
It was a small study (40 people), but I'd definitely be interested in this answer as well.
I believe I read something that indicated that the brain craves high calorie foods (fat, sugar, simple carbs), so I could definitely see the link with them smelling better.
Here is a non-mobile link: http://reuters.com/article/idUSKBN0M30LX20150307?irpc=932
^Sourcecode ^| ^Feedback?
Here is a non-mobile link: http://reuters.com/article/idUSKBN0LF11020150211?irpc=932
^Sourcecode ^| ^Feedback?
Here is a non-mobile link: http://reuters.com/article/idUSKBN0L22IZ20150129?irpc=932
^Sourcecode ^| ^Feedback?
Here is a non-mobile link: http://reuters.com/article/idUSKBN0KW1G620150123?irpc=932
^Sourcecode ^| ^Feedback?
Here is a non-mobile link: http://reuters.com/article/idUSL3N0U61G220141222?irpc=932
^Sourcecode ^| ^Feedback?
Here is a non-mobile link: http://reuters.com/article/idUSL2N0TI0Q720141128?irpc=932
^Sourcecode ^| ^Feedback?
Here is a non-mobile link: http://reuters.com/article/idUSKBN0IK15M20141103?irpc=932
^Sourcecode ^| ^Feedback?
Here is a non-mobile link: http://reuters.com/article/idUSL2N0RY2AV20141003?irpc=932
^Sourcecode ^| ^Feedback?
Here is a non-mobile link: http://reuters.com/article/idUSKCN0HP13X20140930?irpc=932
^Sourcecode ^| ^Feedback?