I host a podcast and we did an episode on Sim theory and I was not really looking forward to it because I did not give it much thought or credence. that was until I started investigating it and finding not only were their clues that point to this being a possibility, but that mainstream scientists even followed this line of thinking and could not really dispute many claims. (or really prove, but that is how theory works)
For me, it opens up so many possibilities of not only a game, a program, or even existence of a higher power of a God if you will. If Simulation is true, where do you draw the lines. It is such a fascinating and frustrating concept all at the same time. Like you said, is it the same for everyone? Why do we dream, is the observer the creator? And now I have gone cross-eyed! lol
Here is a link to our episode in case you are interested in checking it out.
Hysteria 51 - Simulation Theory
This Episode: We explore the fun mystery around Déjà vu, and how it could relate to a possible Simulation? (Title aside, I promise I tried to not be too #basic by keeping the repetition gaffs to a minimum). While this topic has been covered before, I wanted this time to consider three likely possibilities, rather than just call it a glitch.
As always, the Podcast version is also live at https://anchor.fm/awlias or should be out now on all popular podcast platforms. Also apologise for the delay for Episode 6, I’ve been busy with day job but hoping to have at least 2 new Episodes out in December.
Thanks once again everyone for the support!
>Why do you assume the simulation is being run by a civilization,
Because, lonely playing is bored.
And why they create like this type of simulation(consciousness massive multi player.). Why don't let's join those to entertain or party with them?
OK, it's a joke. To tell you the truth, I don't think it is possible for a single entity to create such a stable, historical, natural, physical-mathematical, and even artistic simulation.
As for the rest, well, if you were God, you'd want to talk to Darwin, Newton, and the animals, also singularities right? So they could already be gods too, right?
And I don't think that one person can handle a simulation with so many emotions.
And this world is very much like a social experiment, except for the nature of emotion of the human. I don't see any particular need for such a thing if you are a one entity.
I don't particularly believe that the world is going to end. I believe that human history will continue in its own way. It's just that there are a lot of people who think that way because of the state of the world.
Git is this. And they can handle and developed its super version. Version control system is some data repository system.
https://git-scm.com/
Kinda late but yes sorta like this but not exactly? https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00Z3N9W62/ref=cm_sw_r_apan_i_A0FKA7ADV0D5PTXBN062 Saw it tripping too but the difference is it was imbedded in sacred geometry on the wall.
> 🙄
Thanks, I see that I need to update my unicode fonts. This code 1F644 is part of unicode 8.0 in 2015.
Of those emoji expressions, which I guess is the closest to what you want to express I think LG's is the closest . That is you are neutral on emotions, but see a problem which is beyond your programming to solve.
Instead of my normal AWLIAS episodes, I thought it would be fun instead to celebrate the upcoming 20th Anniversary of The Matrix ...and address rumours of what the new film could be about. It was a lot of fun to make hope you enjoy!
Original text post: https://awlias.com/alliance/showthread.php?tid=18
Podcast version: https://anchor.fm/awlias
PS. Episode #011 is up next when I will be focusing on Part 2 of AI in The Simulation
For this week’s Episode we look at an exciting discovery back in 2014, by a small group of Quantum gravity researchers.
Watch: https://youtube.com/watch?v=ZvEOROfy00Y
Listen: https://anchor.fm/awlias or your go to podcast player.
Please subscribe if you enjoy my little episodes and I’ll make some more!
I may recommend you to read this one.
[PDF] On Singularities and Simulations | Semantic Scholar
https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/On-Singularities-and-Simulations-Dainton/15219141829419dd89bdca96b6f6a8122ec83b27
I think this world is a git-go for the first player in a normally commonly-used simulation world. But it's slightly demonic?
However I can't think at this time any other wise option to anti simulation VR world vaccine.
Yes. The title and first two sentences are my main answer, the most probable at this time.
Why Now? A Quest in Metaphysics - YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=29AgSo6KOtI
[PDF] On Singularities and Simulations | Semantic Scholar
https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/On-Singularities-and-Simulations-Dainton/15219141829419dd89bdca96b6f6a8122ec83b27
And I think there are some worlds up this one.
If anyone has another reasonable idea or refutable one, please let me know.
Why Now? A Quest in Metaphysics - YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=29AgSo6KOtI
[PDF] On Singularities and Simulations - Semantic Scholar
https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/On-Singularities-and-Simulations-Dainton/15219141829419dd89bdca96b6f6a8122ec83b27
And considering we are being born as a human. Such a meaning.
s/stimulation/simulation/g
Good one.
There s a similar project making use of decentralized computing. Its about using shared computer power provided by volunteers to solve scientific problems/ do tests/ create simulations etc.
Yup. check out this series. Super funny and covers a similar idea:
https://www.amazon.com/Are-Legion-Bob-Bobiverse-Book-ebook/dp/B01LWAESYQ
trippy dog... however, simulated universes have shorter lifespans. Base reality is moving along slower than ours. Think of it as a tree of gears with the biggest one at the top and the smaller ones branching out, getting smaller and smaller and increasing in number exponentially. A fractal of sorts. However, life inside the universes aren't all the same. According to "On Computer Simulated Universes," the farther down you go, the better it gets because every civilization wants to be as happy as possible. Thus, they would put themselves in their version of ultimate paradise. If they wanted more time in their simulated universe, and discovered a better idea of what "paradise" is, they would put themselves inside another simulation inside the one they had already put themselves in. Civilizations also have the ability to create trillions of them at every level, so they would try to run ones that end up as perfect as possible, letting the rest die out. Universes would evolve based on this artificial selection. Why are the laws of physics so perfectly fine-tuned to allow for life? According to this book, they evolved. Highly recommend it; it's tiny -- only like 43 pages.
Btw, any interesting books on ST?
I only read On Computer Simulated Universes which was actually a 50 pages, font size 24, book. A nice wrap-up though.