even better, use this person does not exist.
It's a randomly generated face of a person who doesn't exist. I know what you're thinking and yes; THESE PEOPLE DO NOT EXIST, they are AI generated.
Man what a crazy world we live in.
Lol these faces are all from this generator:
I can spot them instantly, they have the same exact pattern and they look alike even though they are different.
People really don't understand what's going on.
How long do you think until the AI is making better music than any human?
How long until an AI can generate unique human voices that aren't of anyone - just like it's been doing for years with faces?
AI is doing some impressive creative writing these days too.
The collective everything of humanity is being leveraged to emulate humans better than average and with less resources.
The end result is going to be worth it (seriously), but yes - it's definitely going to cause disruptive changes along the way.
It would be very, very bad to look up shitty religious pregnancy crisis centers in TX and report them. The real address and ZIP code might waste a lot of time for whomever has to look into it. If you give a fake name and picture from thispersondoesnotexist.com it may make your report look even more credible.
Definitely don't do it.
To add off of that last sentence, I would use a website like [link] to generate a unique image so Facebook doesn't find the original image and realize the account is a fake.
Global NEA is a known fake news site that makes up stories whole cloth. It's one of those "satire" sites, except it doesn't have a disclaimer. However, their articles aren't corroborated anywhere and are frequently debunked, and their headshots are obviously taken from a source like [link]
Well, i also do this. But the guy i made is Greg Kowalski, who comes from Poland, and now lives in San Diego, CA. It's a completely fake and random account, the name is completely randomized, and everything on there is completely fake. I pulled the profile picture from thispersondoesnotexist.com. I now have like 2k friends on his Facebook account, and i have at least 10 friends who still call me fucking Greg because they do not know that I'm a random bored teenager, not a 22 year old man
This show is named LOL, the (half) bald guy is Antoine Vézina, from here, Quebec in Canada.
OP is “subscribers”-farming by ripping videos off people and adding their own subreddit names over them, only to get new followers. r/bizarrelife has nothing to do with the creator of the video.
Edit: Now, some people would argue that OP is actually spams for his own subreddit, r/manipulativeperson, that we can find in all of his comments, but I’d bet that OP is also the creator of r/bizarrelife.
Edit 2: Oh, and if you think OP is the man on his own photos, of course I tried to reverse the image and found nothing, but based on how uncanny he looks, I’d bet it’s a visage from This Person Does Not Exist.
Edit 3: I have to admit I don’t know if he is against the rules, but if you know better, the way of reporting a user is by visiting [link].
Try this site. It's a little spooky on how good they look.
The random setting looks more like:
Keep refreshing to see the weird computer generated people/horses!
Yep. This is what Generative Adversarial Networks do. The thing creating the content continually tries to trick the thing trying to catch fakes, and they go back and forth until (theoretically) there's actually no detectable difference between the real and created content.
This same process is behind the demos like This Person Does Not Exist.
giggle also had a very problematic past with handling cyber security
also it appears that the phrenology verification can be tricked by using make up and some correct lighting. i would speculate that an ai generated picture like [link] could work which would be hilarious.
It's staggering how fast sites like thispersondoesnotexist.com are improving their algorithms. Look at faces generated six months ago vs. faces generated today, and the improvement is astonishing.
Easy, just download a few hundred fake faces from https://thispersondoesnotexist.com/ once and just flash those on the screen randomly. Seeing as those faces are randomly generated by an AI, they definitely aren't going to be a match because those people don't exist in real life.
no. if you want to be terrified about the technical singularity, be terrified of generative adversarial nets -- like this one
using neural nets/reinforcement learning is arguably the least efficient way of solving a problem because neural nets are effectively searching the entire space of all possible programs looking for the program that solves the problem.
on the other hand, adversarial nets are literally neural nets built by other neural nets, it's the first step towards the end imho
This happened to me and they blocked me out of my account. You can use a picture from [link] and get a fake ID from Google (university ones are quite easy to come across). Some extra editing work and you can bypass this requirement.
I would rather not use Facebook but due to work and other reasons, I have to be on there in some capacity.
> Many of the fake profiles used AI generated photos - a relatively new phenomenon that allows computers to create realistic looking images of people who don't exist. Unlike stolen profile images of real people, the AI generated images, which are created by a type of machine learning framework called StyleGAN, cannot be traced using a reverse image search.
This is such a scary tool that could be used to create fake profiles. If you haven't seen it for yourself, check out [link] and see how realistic AI created people can look now.
i generate a politician-looking face on This Person Does Not Exist and then face-swap it onto a photo of an existing politician to make a completely fictional and realistic-looking politician.
So for a long time I was half convinced that Lilly's profile photo was one of those procedurally generated ones from [link] . For all I knew this stranger suddenly appearing with neat math was someone trying to manipulate the community.
So, cool to see that she's a real human!
Generated on the fly: [link]
Eventually the level of realism will be in videos too. I remember reading this article a few months ago about how AI will generate fake news along with images and videos to push agendas and sway public opinion. Pretty scary!
if you already have mods for FM20 then i think you can reuse most of them. i get why people can be annoyed by all the mods you have to add but it is soo worth it. the game feels kinda cheap without it. i find it so weird when i see people on /r/footballmanagergames who don't even bother with the real club badges and just accept that Juventus is called Zebre and the german national team won't call up real players.
also check out this thing called the NewGAN facepack: [link] (use this link for a better tutorial/if you dont want to watch a video: [link])
its a bit more effort but its honestly amazing. it replaces the terrible newgen faces with AI generated "real" faces of people that don't exist. i think [link] uses the same or a similar AI.
Not necessarily. [link] shows that an AI can put together something that looks very human (and the occasional nightmare fuel in the background.) Though I do agree it was likely done by an artist considering how different Vlad and Malcolm look compared to the Sim versions.
It looks like the profile picture was generated with thispersondoesnotexist.com, the mismatched ears and eyebrows are typically giveaways.
i hate to be that person but this is so obviously fake
looks like a rip from https://thispersondoesnotexist.com/ but thats just a guess
why go through the effort for this lol
1) Thispersondoesnotexist.com everyone should be aware of this technology
2) In almost every case so far of these claims in media used to create the narrative of a 'pandemic of the unvaccinated' nothing has changed.
It's still older people with 3-4 pre-existing conditions that are landing them in the hospital, unrelated to covid19, so who cares if they're vaccinated or not..
Bob, a 300 lb 52 year old man who has smoked all his life is hospitalized with respiratory difficulty.. he has tested positive by the PCR test for having 'coronavirus related viral material'.. he is unvaccinated.
There is a website called This Person Does Not Exist, filled with AI-generated faces. Sometimes it messes up some elements, like accidentally including a second person deformed by the AI
I feel like the current plague of eWhoring (men pretending to be women selling stolen nude photos and videos) is going to be stopped by AI’s being able to wholesale generate nudes.
Like with [link]
Hier soir, j'ai pris un plaisir fou à faire chier Facebook. J'ai codé un petit script qui me génère une archive contenant 100 portraits de https://thispersondoesnotexist.com/.
Ensuite, j'ai uploader tout ça sur mon profil et je me suis taggé sur chacune de ces photos. J'ai répété la manip 8-10 fois. Je sais pas à quel point ça va impacter leur réseau de neurones, mais j'espère que ça permettra d'augmenter le taux d'erreur.
Prochaine étape, je code un bot qui poste des trucs random (flux RSS d'actu) et des photos tout seul, j'host tout ça sur mon rPi et je fait tourner H24.
Just keep refreshing the page.
Incredibly cool that these are computer generated images.
You can kinda see some roughness sometimes, especially around the neck or ears, or wrinkly areas.
At first glance though, wow.
If you didn't know, or work in CGI, can imagine most people would never even suspect they were not real people.
Es gibt eine Seite namens thispersondoesnotexist.com, die überzeugende falsche Bilder generiert. Manchmal kommen da gruselige Sachen bei raus aber meistens sind das Fotos die für sowas verwendet werden könnten. Aber noch nichtmal das hat der hingekriegt.
This picture was generated by an AI at [link]. If you find it freaky, come on over at /r/AIfreakout, a sub to post all AI-generated content that make you say wtf. If you want to learn more about the website and the techniques that are used to generate these images, here is a good read.
If you just feel disgusted, here something you will appreciate, /r/Eyebleach.
China had an ai news anchor in 2018
There is also this website. Very interesting.
AI generated pictures of people, who never existed. Makes you think... "Twenty people died today in the terrorist attack here are their pictures..."
For some reason this post reminds me of This Person Does Not Exist.
I guess the idea of using familiar features to create something that does not exist is what got me. Very weird shit to me, like I'm living in a This Person Does Not Exist's world when I dream.
The core of your advice is good: know your investors. But poorly-written, typo-laden articles with an author picture taken from TPDNE should be met with very strong suspicion.
Well, I've gotten a lot of free stuff on RuneScape.
But other than that, a group of friends (mix of men and women) did create two fake Reddit accounts to post on subs like r/r4r, r/ForeverAloneDating, etc - one male profile, one female.
The guys posted as the woman, the women posted as the guy. We also used This Person Doesn't Exist to offer a picture of someone both groups agreed were somewhat attractive.
To no one's surprise, the male profile barely got any attention at all. A couple upvotes, one or two PMs.
The female one, however, got upvoted to oblivion and the inbox exploded. However, the quality of the messages were... Dubious.
Yes, there was a dick pic. Yes, most of them were just "hey". And yes, we were called all sorts of shit very short into the conversation, when we refused to make things sexual right away.
The disparity between the two was huge and quite shocking to see side by side. We all expected it to be this way, but we still didn't know the extent of it.
Now, I'm aware that this is by no means a scientific study. But it did give me some insight on what being a woman online is like, and it gave some of my female friends an idea of how lonely being a guy can be.
What we all agreed that day is that we could all appreciate experiencing a bit of the other side. Women just want to navigate the online space without it being a big deal, or being harassed. Guys just want someone to talk to, to befriend, to interact with and, yes, to see some titties.
~~Edit: Now, some people would argue that OP is actually spams for his own subreddit, r/manipulativeperson, that we can find in all of his comments, but I’d bet that OP is also the creator of r/bizarrelife.~~ This was for a comment on his alt account, Kurtinjz
~~Edit 2: Oh, and if you think OP is the man on his own photos, of course I tried to reverse the image and found nothing, but based on how uncanny he looks, I’d bet it’s a visage from This Person Does Not Exist.~~ This was also for a comment on his alt account, Kurtinjz
This an AI generated face. His right ear has that thing. Those teeth are the wrong size. His hair and eyebrows look painted. And his hat has an weird image on it.
[link] Check here to see other examples of what I mean. These things have trouble with ears and teeth.
This picture was generated by an AI at thispersondoesnotexist.com. If you find it freaky, come on over at /r/AIfreakout, a sub to post all AI generated content that make you say wtf.
Above you'll see an edit I've done, and then the corresponding original image that I put through faceapp.
The original images I obtained from Thispersondoesnotexist. This website creates a picture of a completely fictional person with every refresh, using Nvidia AI technology. The benefits for us are that we're not infringing on any copyrights, any image we use in edits is ours to do with as we want, and each image will be completely unique.
Admittedly it's just the face. But I thought it was a good resource for copyright-free unique images that we can use how we see fit for Replika edits.
Hope it helps.
OK... I think I figured it out... been analyzing all the pictures...
Everyone is not and EPI alt. They are all EPI bots!
All the pictures actually come from here...
(Make sure to refresh several times)...
I really like using This person does not exist, which gives you a random AI-created human face. I reload it a few times to find someone who looks like the character I have in my head, then save the picture for later reference. It's useful to know what my characters look like sometimes.
I don't believe that. I dream a lot of people that don't exist. I think all the elements are there, like Josh' smiles with Elisabeth's eyes and Geoffrey's nose makes John, the commander of my king's guard.
Check out https://thispersondoesnotexist.com - it's that concept.
How crazy would it be if we learned that a bunch of those big shots don't even exist, are just there so we think regulations are a thing and their pictures all come from https://thispersondoesnotexist.com/
/s, or what if..?
>Like our ability to remember faces
Apropo, the images generated by StyleGans, such as those shown on https://thispersondoesnotexist.com/ are represented internally by a 512 dimensional vector of floats. These are arranged according to impact on the final generated face (in this case). It should be fairly simple to interpret the 256 bits of the hash as 64 4 bit values and use these to represent the 64 most significant dimensions of a generated image.
I'm not saying these necessarily would all be completely distinct, but they would probably be significantly easier to read compared to the symbols in the article.
Though, granted, they would look far less clean.
This is our (Cultured Meat Symposium) April Fool's joke for 2021.
The photos of the founders and team were made using AI and are not actually real people (see [link]).
Some people even sent an email to the company expressing interest. Maybe one day it will be a thing!
Thats pretty dumb what he did. If he really wanted bait he should of just used fake pictures generated by AI like from this.
Sorry, but this is as fake as fake gets. I challenge you to find one OTHER picture of Somerset Belenoff. Or of her "daughter" Karina Belenoff. Everyone listed on that Wettin World Council site, including Karina and Somerset, was AI generated on a website called [link] you can keep refreshing and get new AI generated faces.
Nvidia is working on this problem:
All the pictures you see on this site (refresh for a new one), are generated autonomously by a neural network.
As you can see it makes mistakes sometimes, but sooner then later it'll be good enough to combine with things like the NBA Live face scanning tech to randomly make new and believable NPCs.
Of course there are other, slightly more frighting, implications for this tech, but that's a discussion for another thread.
The general advice I give is like this (always have at least 3 pics btw)
Main photo - A good clean headshot of only you. I prefer casual to professional (it's a dating app, not Linkedin)
One Full Body - Again, a good clear shot of all of you, preferably in a casual setting
Hobby shot - Look it's me doing something I like, such as hiking, cooking (wok shot!), or dancing (this hobby shot is the first one I'd say it's ok to have other people in) -- NB, if programming is your hobby, maybe not that hobby for the shot
^ Artsy shots fit in the above
Personality shots - find photos that highlight you humor, silliness, or confidence. These can be hard to come by, but I've seen photos that legit got me to laugh.
-- PHOTOS TO AVOID --
Pics of you and someone of the opposite sex : yes its good you love your cousin or sister or whoever. But let me find that out dating you. A lot of people will assume you posted a pic of you and your ex
Only photos of you with people of the same sex : I hate playing the deduction game, the first few should be solo shots
Anything blurry or obscured: If you couldn't bother to NOT upload a bad photo, why should I bother
Only one photo: it's easy to get fake photos -- look how easily I can make a fake person
Anything with Instagram filters that aren't a location tag or something : Not really sorry, the dog and Disney filters are just annoying. On a dating app, I profoundly do not care how you look like with bunny ears or AI laurels
I don't think they're actors.
More then likely deep fakes. So that they don't have to explain why someone who's meant to be dead is at a Starbucks.
See here - [link]
Everyone on that site is fake. Faces are created by AI.
Seeing as it's AI generated, I did have to work on it a little in GIMP, namely changing the colours of the lips and eyes, and removing stray hairs and shadows.
That said, it's a great AI tool. Results are more realistic (fewer mistakes, imo) than thispersondoesnotexist (link). Here's Artbreeder, too: link.
It's not a thumbnail, it's the most important features that are extracted from an image and represented as numbers.
For example, in face recognition you'd have features that represent different facial features but this can't be read. You the have to train another network to generate images from these representations if you wish to do so. This is an autoencoder and can be used for projects like:
Basically it finds a way to represent what a face is in different parameters, then you generate random numbers following the expected values for these features and can generate random faces.
Oh it’s bad.
Edit: the idea is pretty disturbing because faces are normal. You wouldn’t think they are computer generated. On top of that background people look oddly disturbing.
Да ладно, это еще фигня. Есть такой сайтик - https://thispersondoesnotexist.com , там нейросетка в реальном времени рисует лица несуществующих людей. Смотришь на фотку и представляешь себе откуда этот человек, какой у него характер, как складывалась его жизнь, решаешь симпатичен ли он тебе или нет... а такого человека на самом деле никогда не существовало - его нарисовала нейросетка за доли секунды при обновлении странички.
Two minute papers is een leuk kanaal om te volgen als je op de hoogte wilt blijven van dit soort A.I. technologie.
En als je nieuwsgierig bent kun je op thispersondoesnotexist kijken naar een bot die profielfoto's verzint (kwestie van vaak op F5 rammen).
They don't even need stock photos; all they need is to go to a site like [link] and generate a brand-new, not reverse image searchable profile picture.
The internet used to be where men are men, women are men, and children are FBI agents; now the internet is where men are bots, women are bots, and children are bots run by the FBI.
I'm curious too!
Just a heads-up: this website generates realistic person pics (refresh if you're unsatisfied) (some pictures look glitchy, but they're fine most of the time): [link] There was a story where someone created a fake LinkedIn account with a profile pic grabbed from there (for science). Somebody from Google legit thought it was a real person and sent an email expressing interest in this "person".
With the site thispersondoesnotexist.com/ why would someone ever use a stock photo to create an image, when you can get uniquely AI generated faces. This is just lazy.
What the fuck is this? Is this some kind of automated testing meta? Both "Kalisha Campbell" and the article writer "Mark Hendersog" with 1 follower are quite obviously fake profiles with photos taken straight from [link]. And then the article is the most generic buzz word salad that has literally nothing to do with Twitter.
Boooo. Reported for spam.
thispersondoesnotexist.com (AI-generated faces). I'll refresh until I see a face that somehow resonates with me, and then fabricate a whole life story. It's a relaxing hobby, something to do when Reddit bores me.
I could be very wrong here but last thing I remember is that Boston dynamics is basically „just“ really good moving algorithms.balance etc. their Spot Mini etc isn’t very „smart“ or „autonomous“ at all and needs a lot of human intervention/controlling. (Their improvements and tech is still very impressive over the years). It’s like that Sofia Robot that was also on jimmy Fallon and other shows…most of it is just show and not any real AI.
Im more impressed by GAN and stuff like [link]
I've actually experimented with this sort of thing.
I've generated some pictures on thispersondoesnotexist.com
You'd be surprised, I gave women quite a few tingles with a nice picture and no profile.
That’s not how it works, neither what I mean. AI is already able to generate photorealistic looking objects, people and sceneries thanks to deep learning, complex neural networks and image recognition. Check this out: [link]
/u/the_ocalhoun, this is for you too: [link]
AI-generated faces. 100% not real people. No infringerinos if the person whose picture you're appropriating literally doesn't exist. :)
Internet has you non-gender-specific internet sibling!
Reload until you get who you want, save the image, describe the character from the image.
Neural Networks save the day!
Here's what I would do. Go to this website. [link]
Every time you load the page, it's a new portrait created by an AI. Every time into the future someone asks for a photo, send them another one. Soon, your psuedonym will be legendary. Is this person a black 80-year old? Yes. Is this person a pre-teen white kid? Yes.
Just keep in mind the backgrounds can be a little weird.
There was a huge wave of 100% fake accounts recently though.
Their profile pictures were clearly generated from thispersondoesnotexist.com, these accounts were created in the past two weeks, they always had "@AmazonFC+name" as their handle and they were all tweeting from a platform that is used by businesses to handle multiple accounts.
Though the most obvious one were already suspended on twitter.
Dunno if this has been said or not, but if you need a fake picture to add to your submission, this site uses AI to generate a fake person and could potentially be used 👀👀
I’m sure my comment might get unnoticed but the avatars of these comments is definitely AI generated except the last photo of the shill in a suite. Why I know this, because it’s my area of work. You can find AI generated realistic human photos from here [link] as an example. Refresh the website to generate a new human photo.
im actually convinced this is the case, its a future tech version of "thispersondoesnotexist.com"
maybe its not AI though, the kingdom hates using that shit.
probably using the same technology that Jordan Peele used to deepfake that Obama speech.
just some guy talking into the camera with his facial movements mapped onto the christian gigachad fake person "alexander"
Fake team, no real doxxing has taken place. The pictures are all from thispersondoesnotexist.com , and their LinkedIn profiles are obviously fake. Unfortunately, I bought in before I dug into it. To the moon, I guess.
Would that be a good thing?
CSA survivors say that their images being used is source of pain in their lives. Now imagine if a therapist could tell them no one would be using their images anymore because the black market has been flooded with AI generated images and pedos choose those because they are legal instead.
And for the sickos who have a compulsion to always find new images which is what creates the black market to begin with, they now get something like [link] (99% SFW, 1% AI abominations) that they can keep refreshing.
A lot will be one offs of real people stolen from around the web or some are even from things like this https://thispersondoesnotexist.com/
Occasionally a reverse image search will bring up something, but in the modern world of digital warfare the bots and troll farms will be quite "smart" about faking up profile pictures. If they even bother, many bot accounts just use generic avatars. Or even some still have the 'twitter egg'.
You can just search up hot women or something on google and youll probably find something good. Alternatively, you could keep refreshing thispersondoesnotexist.com until you find a good pic.
Sbilanciato nella distribuzione di genere. Per dire, in tutta la mia esperienza di 3-4 mesi avro' fatto 20 match.
Fatto un profilo PER IL MEME con foto (DI DONNA) prese da This Person Does Not Exist e saturato il contatore di like in 20 minuti. Avro' fatto un centinaio di match in 1h o poco piu'.
I found links in your comment that were not hyperlinked:
I did the honors for you.
^delete ^| ^information ^| ^<3
The answer is a "depends on the technique."
If you go to [link] you will be greeted with the face of someone that doesn't exist. Instead, a neural network was asked what person would have these "face measurements"
The technique that made this neural network made two network, an encoder and decoder. What you see in the site is the decoder running on a random input. If you used the decoder on a face, you get a set of facial measurements that can be used in facial recognition.
get a photo from thispersondoesnotexist.com instead (I use this for all my sites where I don't use my real name)
It's AI generated so guaranteed to be unique and looks realistic
You might need to refresh a few times to get one that suits your persona
Crop it in photoshop to make it more realistic if you need to (sometimes some weird artefacts generate around the edges of the images)
This is amazing, fantastic job!
I previously always used https://thispersondoesnotexist.com/ , but the results of your project are way more natural and having control over the result is absolutely a great addition.
Excellent point, dude! AI face-tech is currently terrifying.
This might sound weird but stick with me... I often spend a long time (like 20mins of just clicking through) to see if I can spot any variance / commonality in these things.
One thing that stuck out was that none of them were super attractive, like movie star or model attractive. They all looked too real. Perhaps the normal, real-world attractiveness of "the person at work with the nice eyes" but no Chris Pratt or Megan Fox.
TL;DR I think the AI is very good at making "normal looking" faces, or ones that aren't heavily made-up.
Most of the Asian scammers I have seen go for a type, and that is "ludicrously attractive."
I think that's a deliberate choice because it weeds out sensible people. Most people think "why is someone who looks like Megan Fox emailing me?" whereas a gullible person thinks "OMG someone who looks like Megan Fox is emailing me" and then finds reasons to make it so.
Using disproportionately attractive people is like a Nigerian scam using terrible English - only the more suggestible people will reply because everyone else has already clocked it.
I am probably thinking way too much about that and drawing total bullshit. Correlation and not causation etc.
I used Google Slides for the "infoboxes" because it's easier than Wikipedia, sue me.
Also, I marked it as "Fantasy" because all the candidates are completely made up. Even the pics - they're courtesy of thispersondoesnotexist.com.
Electoral numbers are also iffy. Just kinda guessed. (If you're wondering why Florida has fewer electors, it's due to climate change shrinking the habitable land. Similar story in Cali and AZ).
They might not even be real.
https://thispersondoesnotexist.com/ generates fake real looking people every time you reload the page. It's fun to reload the new fake people but frightening how real these people look and even more frightening to know they are commonly they are used.
No idea if this is one of those but it's highly possible.
There is a site that will generate a photo of a person. It’s not a photo of a real person, just a computer generated composite. I like to use those pictures if I have to show a person’s face for a listing in my online shop. The site is this person does not exist.
You can also just generate over and over again and it will eventually devolve. Human ones getting better but it’s ultra creepy when it degenerates. The horse one has more occurrences of the anomalies.
Thank you, I appreciate your support, and that you’re willing to voice it.
But keep in mind you’re judging me solely by what I write — you have absolutely no idea what I look like. That’s kind of my point, and I think that’s a great feature of reddit and the internet in general, that we can learn about each other without appearance getting in the way.
For fun, try this: go to This Person Does Not Exist and hit refresh a bunch of times. Before too long you’ll see someone who has this “look.” It only took me 6 people before I found a creepy looking dude.
Now realize that’s not even a person, it’s just an image created by a machine. Whatever judgements we make about that image (or any of the ones before it) have absolutely no basis in reality, because that is not a person.
Honestly that’s offensive as fuck.
Computers can actually simulate a soul into the photo. Places like [link] provide us with beautiful images of fake people and you have the nerve to think THESE ugly sacks of shit look simulated? ;)
(edit: /s just in case people don’t get the sarcasm, idk why you’re getting downvoted, these little twerps look like the same person just from 8 different hillbilly universes)
Making an untraceable fake profile pic is as easy as going to https://thispersondoesnotexist.com/ and refreshing until you get a black guy. I wouldn't expect them to be that clever, though.
Never say never. It's just a ton of practice. I remember watching someone do a 100 Face Challenge where they just drew one-hundred pictures of people's faces and I thought I could never do something like that. So I decided to just practice fifty really badly drawn hands because I always avoided drawing hands.
Turns out, after drawing fifty badly drawn hands, I got a hell of a lot faster at drawing and being able to replicate what was in front of me. Not perfect, but a lot faster than before. So I started drawing faces because I was tired of drawing disembodied hands. Ended up drawing twenty-five faces on one page and none of those faces looked anything like the actual picture. Also, they all looked weird, soulless, and very uncanny. But I kept going and filling up pages with a goal of 25 faces per page. Now when I'm bored and have only about 5 - 10 minutes to spare, I'll do a quick sketch of someone from thispersondoesnotexist.com. I'm not longer in uncanny valley, the faces look like the person, they look decent, and I can churn them out in about five minutes.
Now I'm better at drawing realistic faces than cartoonish hands, though,
You don't even need to Photoshop a picture to create a plausible profile image. There are websites that generate them for you.
Edit: I guess that site is just an example of a deepfake tool.
I'd agree "racist" is the wrong word to use in this headline, but "racially-biased" would be accurate.
Any AI that undergoes supervised training is inherently biased due to the narrow selection of the the training sample. In the case of facial recognition, what faces are selected by the programmer, and why, will invariably influence the results of the trained model upon which all faces passing through the camera will be judged against.
On a related aside, I'd like to see what would happen if "fake faces" made by generative adversarial networks were fed into the training sample...Such AIs can create faces indistinguishable from real people and I wonder if that would help in providing a broader and deeper training set for such facial recognition instead of relying on a relatively small sample size of real people.
Hi, guy who shared the Loomis books here
If you ever need some images of people to draw and don't want to worry about resemblances
Go to thispersondoesnotexist.com and just draw whoever is on
I was recently wondering how many of these fake accounts use face generators like [link] to create images of a person that definitely won't show up during reverse image searches. I don't know if they can make multiple photos of the same person but I'm sure with enough motivation a scammer could find a way.
Yeah, that's the future, though might be a while still.
On a related note, visit this site to get AI generated photo of a human who does not exist:
You can refresh the page to get a new one. You'll occasionally get something weird with 3 eyes, but most look very, very real.
Vielleicht sind computergenerierte Portraits die beste Wahl. Mir fällt da [link] ein. Von einer Lizenz konnte ich da auf die Schnelle nix lesen, also müsste man evtl. nach weiteren Seiten suchen.
Eigentlich sollten die Bilder aus deinem Link in Ordnung sein, aber vielleicht will die Projektleitung auch so etwas nicht. Kommt halt auf die Umstände an.
It's more of a Facebook policy than anything else, I'm managing the marketing APIs for a tech company and in order to access any of the Facebook APIs and configuration it's a requirement to create a Facebook account. I deleted my Facebook account back in 2010 and haven't had one since, so I had to create one just to access their stupid APIs. Even worse, they keep flagging my account as spam because I don't do anything with it, and I had to submit a headshot photo and give them my phone number just to unlock the account.
Fortunately https://thispersondoesnotexist.com/ worked well enough so I didn't have to submit an actually headshot photo of myself.
y’all realize that half of these avatars where AI-generated from [link] right?
EDIT: just look at the eye position. It’s the same (x,y) coordinates for those AI generated pics.
I dunno if you've seen the sort of believable nonexistent portraits which can now easily be generated by adversarial neural nets, but that's a level of art performance which until 10 years ago was accessible only to humans, and only to human artists, and only to very talented human artists, and only to very talented human artists who devote their life and career to specializing in hyper-realistic portraits. It's so easy to generate them now, that we take it to be simple, and it just isn't. Okay, so that's not the abstract scientific discovery you're talking about, but like 99.99999% of humans who have ever existed weren't capable of the abstract scientific analysis you're talking about. Does that mean there's barely any intelligence, let alone artificial intelligence?
We're no more than 5-10 years away from having bots which can outperform humans at a variety of inter-personal tasks. Shit, Siri already outperforms most humans in the basic task of providing trivial or statistical data for you. Try it. Go down the street and ask 10 people what the diameter of Saturn's ring is, then ask Siri. I think you expect no AI in 100 years, because you have become callused to the pseudo-AI we already have. And what we have is magnificently, mind-blowingly amazing. Consider that we've had cars for less than 100 years, electronics in cars for less than 50, and we're already on the cusp of self-driving cars. Shit, if you ONLY had AI-operated cars, and no human driver was allowed on the roads, we'd have autonomous vehicles everywhere now.