What are
/r/GGFreeForAll's
favorite Products & Services?
From 3.5 billion Reddit comments
The most popular Products mentioned in /r/GGFreeForAll:
![The Spectacle of Violence: Homophobia, Gender and Knowledge (Writing Corporealit[i]es)](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/41-mgNJHKjL._SL500_.jpg)
The most popular Services mentioned in /r/GGFreeForAll:
Dictionary.com
Alexa
The New York Times
The Guardian
Thesaurus.com
Quora
Kotaku
Minds
Wikiquote
ezgif.com
Healthcare.gov
Scribd
Open Culture
The Weather Channel
The most popular Android Apps mentioned in /r/GGFreeForAll:
The most popular reviews in /r/GGFreeForAll:
Just because it's losing your interest, doesn't mean it's losing others'. But Alexa is terrible, I'll have access to Comscore again later this year, for real results.
Youtube: Ranked 3° http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/www.youtube.com
I know .. the comparison is unfair, youtube has a lot of other stuff but is where the shrinking game journalism audience is going.
Most "gators" don't care about any of the sites mentioned. You don't even need to be informed of that, you know but you are pretending that it isn't true for the sake of point scoring.
Game journalism is dying of a slow agonizing death and I can't wait to see it fail completely... that's pretty much the bottom line.
SJW here.
Mansplaining: Sexist word. Not totally fine.
Bossy: Not inherently sexist, just often used in a sexist way.
cunt: From the dictionary-
>All senses of this word are vulgar slang andare very strongly tabooed and censored. The meanings that refer to a woman and a contemptible person are used with disparaging intent and are perceived as highly insulting and demeaning. There are many words used to refer to people in sexual terms. However, to call a person a cunt, especially a woman, is one of the most hateful and powerful examples of verbal abuse in the English language.
Emphasis mine.
Clinton voters would turn up for Bernie. Bernie voters wouldn't turn up for Clinton. That's because a lot of Bernie supporters didn't really give a shit about his views, just the fact that he wasn't Clinton.
Bernie lost by millions of votes, even with what we now know is mass amounts of anti-Clinton propaganda from Russia that has been going on for many years, along with the entire of fox news, along with the ENTIRE internet. Even with all that, he still lost, because the actual democrats themselves weren't the ones who loved him. Random white guys on reddit, or trump supporters trying to set up an easier battle, really loved him though. Hell, sandersforpresident is constantly confused as to whether it should say anything bad about Trump, or just keep non-stop whining about Clinton forever.
What is giving you trouble exactly?
> Whether something is a dox or not has nothing to do with how far you spread it.
Well google gives us -
> search for and publish private or identifying information about (a particular individual) on the Internet, typically with malicious intent
Here is also the Merriam-Webster's defintiion. The whole "making public" is pretty integral to what doxing is, it's part of most definitions.
Digging into people to find that information can be real fucking scummy, but your definition doesn't match many others that I could find. Fine by me if that's the definition you want to go with tho, I will remember it for future conversations.
> The story began in September 2015, when a wealthy Republican donor who strongly opposed Mr. Trump put up the money to hire a Washington research firm run by former journalists, Fusion GPS, to compile a dossier about the real estate magnate’s past scandals and weaknesses, according to a person familiar with the effort. The person described the opposition research work on condition of anonymity, citing the volatile nature of the story and the likelihood of future legal disputes. The identity of the donor is unclear.
>
lol heres one from hernandez with added disclosure before gamergate even fuckin happened for ya
https://kotaku.com/depression-quest-the-thoughtful-game-about-mental-heal-1476630988
> (Update: Full disclosure, Quinn and I are friends.)
> Their choice of director was an extremely obvious ploy by sony to appeal to the bridesmaid crowd.
bridesmaids was a popular, profitable, and well-received comedy by critics and audiences alike.
> Don't be surprised if the final poster has them in front of a brick wall to further draw that parallel.
brick walls in movie posters are pushing an agenda?
> Here is a hint that crowd is not who the original ghostbusters appealed to.
i'm confused. ghostbusters wasn't a popular, profitable, and well-received comedy by critics and audiences alike?
> The fact that you cucks are still upset
umadbro? yawn. It's just a funny contrast with writing about matters of national security for the Intercept. deep breath Mikey Boy.
> Yawn He apologized. Victim accepted the apology.
"Leave Biddle alllooooooooooone!" Why are you white-knighting for poor iddle biddle? I'm not hurting him. He's fine. He's a big boy. Plus his path to an apology was a pretty tawdry affair in and of itself He's not a nice guy.
> In January 2014, I received an email from Biddle, explaining his reasoning. “The fact that she was a P.R. chief made it delicious,” he wrote. “It’s satisfying to be able to say, ‘O.K., let’s make a racist tweet by a senior IAC employee count this time.’ And it did. I’d do it again.” Biddle said he was surprised to see how quickly her life was upended, however. “I never wake up and hope I [get someone fired] that day — and certainly never hope to ruin anyone’s life.” Still, he ended his email by saying that he had a feeling she’d be “fine eventually, if not already.” He added: “Everyone’s attention span is so short. They’ll be mad about something new today.”
. > She begged people to stop bringing it up.
I'll take your word for it. Do you think I'm doing her any harm by bringing it up?
> He was essentially any sort of -ist you can imagine, as everyone falls under, well, everyone.
Right, sort of. Except he wasn't a misandrist. He was a misogynist.
While he was a self hating Asian, hated men (100% based on women), wanted to prevent others from getting what he couldn't have. It all came back to women. That was the entire reason he was who he was, his hatred of women.
https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Elliot_Rodger
>How could an inferior, ugly black boy be able to get a white girl and not me? I am beautiful, and I am half white myself. I am descended from British aristocracy. He is descended from slaves. I deserve it more.
See? His racism is fueld by his desire to own women as property.
>It was that pathetic feeling of not having a hot girlfriend on my arm while some other boys in the theatre did. What I truly wanted... what I truly NEEDED, was a girlfriend. I needed a girl’s love. I needed to feel worthy as a male. For so long I have felt worthless, and it’s all girls’ fault. No girl wanted to be my girlfriend.
Look at his hatred of men!
>The Spring of 2013 was also the time when I came across the website PUAHate.com. It is a forum full of men who are starved of sex, just like me ... though unlike me they would be too cowardly to act on it.
Clearly it wasn't his issues with women that caused him to go on a murder spree! No way!
> WatchingSays is actually Emma Watson(this is an example and not true as far as I know).
How daer u dawx me?
> Then the definition interpretation you are siting is completely useless, WatchingSays(this is me doxxing you apparently). Your understanding of "identifying" here is questionable.
Double dawx gtfo Shoden hacker!
In all seriousness, it's the most common definition [if google results are anything to come by.] It also is cited in a credible source as most people would see it [Oxford Dictionary.] It's also employed by in parts the less credible wikipedia, the economist, merriam webster and so on.
You're right to say it isn't the only definition. A more reasonable definition can be found here http://www.dictionary.com/browse/dox
But in terms of seemingly being the most common [and by implication most widely used] the one I provided first appears to win out. In terms of 'identifying' [Kill me, about to cite wikipedia] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personally_identifiable_information
> Personally identifiable information (PII), or Sensitive Personal Information (SPI),[1][2][3] as used in US privacy law and information security, is information that can be used on its own or with other information to identify, contact, or locate a single person, or to identify an individual in context.
> NIST Special Publication 800-122 defines PII as "any information about an individual maintained by an agency, including (1) any information that can be used to distinguish or trace an individual‘s identity, such as name
The most common definition of identifiable on google outside of wikipedia being:
> able to be recognized; distinguishable.
Which again, would cover a name.
This may well be the least intelligent argument I've ever stood by, which is probably an achievement. But going purely by the rules [which you know I do to beyond a fault typically] it's entirely accurate.
http://www.britannica.com/topic/minority
>As the term is used in the social sciences, this subordinancy is the chief defining characteristic of a minority group. As such, minority status does not necessarily correlate to population.
Any more questions? Dumbass.
Guardian has it at 47%:
A gay Muslim wrote an interesting response:
>With mind controls rays, or what.
I know you guys are denser than the core of Jupiter, but the fed is privately owned and controls our economy. If you control the purse you control the house. It's not rocket science.
>https://www.healthcare.gov/glossary/out-of-pocket-maximum-limit/
Lol a government link. Must be true then.
>There are holes in Obamacare that need plugged, but as usual the truthers have to invent doomsday scenarios to overplay their hand.
Yeah, help me out if I don't carry insurance is it a fine or a tax? Obama said it was a fine, not a tax, but the SCOTUS changed it for him....so which is it? The whole abortion needs to be sucked out of existance.
Does that make more sense to you now?
>If you want to argue about novel concept then you have to argue that no story has ever been about depression or there has never been a choose your own adventure game for your claim to have any validity.
Name another choose your adventure with depression as the subject. In a matter of fact, google choose your adventure depression and tell me what the first thing that pops up is?
>What I usually do is blah blah blah I'm so crafty and clever
Someone never read The Art of War, The 48 Laws of Power, or any similar shit. In your hubris, you just tipped your own hand, thereby rendering any and all future acts on this sub powerless and easy to ignore.
It's funny how gators always want everyone to know how crafty they are, flailing their chubby digits in the air screaming "THIS IS HOW I'M THE SMARTEST PERSON IN THE ROOM!111!1", ironically making themselves impotent and ineffectual in their "quest" to wow everyone with their "genius."
I was doing the same thing...whats-her-name mom something did to expose SJW people trying to dox her. I KNEW they were doxxers and that's how their clique operated from day one, that's I knew half the shit in the con leaks I just didn't have hard proof except the fact SOMEHOW Zoe knew info from people that doxed me. She gave it away in conversation.
THAT'S why I'm still here and give a shit. Like I said if I was going to dox myself I'd blame it on GG.
I have literally NOTHING to gain by being allied with GG...except making enemies of a lot of people I admired at some point...you think I as a DJ and musician would conciously make the choice to be someone Talib Kweli calls out to what make friends with fucking Sargon?!
No obviously I really really believe in what GG is doing and really really have beef with the SJWs...for the record that was a crackhouse anyways, if baph could of got the place swatted they'd be doing the neighborhood a favor since the police even said quit calling about it, there's a few addresses I constantly use as "dox" that are either crackhouses or sex offenders. I even do it in my ads for apps.
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=talhaansari.example.come.uberproject
http://www.icrimewatch.net/offenderdetails.php?OfndrID=2025041&AgencyID=55242
(looking it up they took henry pater off the list for some reason but kept his accomplice on...if you want to know how I REALLY feel about pedos and rapists consider I've been trolling some over a decade AFTER release from prison and willing to send baph their way.)
I didn't go to GG, didn't announce I had been doxed and I let everyone that saw it on baph in on what was going on until someone went and blabbed to KIA...
[Versus 1] Recruiting the ill-fated for "The War" A legion of uneducated, bankrupt souls With a lust for revenge, answering the call From New Yorqatar to Califarabia Desperation provides fertile ground for religious extremism This glorious brainwashing where prejudice lies Like a crouching tiger Tormenting peasants till they erect an army Under everyone's nose In the end propaganda destroys their DNA, God help them
[Solo - Drover] [Solo - Mustaine]
[Chours] All that they envisioned of what things would come to be Turned into a pink mist when they blew to smithereens We are just a war away from Amerikhastan When God versus God;the undoing of man Promising a vapor, in the end they become one
[Solo - Drover]
[Versus 2] No rules of engagement, this enemy hides Amongst women and children And to beat violence, you must ignore the focus groups You must send in the Mossad, turn of the BBC, CNN And don't look back Rest assured there'll be no more Middle Eastern crisis, hell! There'll be no more Middle East! These are your people Liberty Pull up your dress today And tattooed is "property of The USA A subsidiary of Halliburton" Surprise?! But a roaring lion is about to be on earth Hey, Jihad Joe? Guess what? We're coming to get you!
[Solo - Drover] [Solo - Mustaine]
[Chours] All that you envisioned of what things will come to be Turns into a death knell when you look behind the scenes We are just a war away from Amerikhastan When God versus God, the undoing of man
https://www.linkedin.com/vsearch/p?f_CC=6434787&trk=rr_connectedness
The fuck you talking about? Fine bros are scum but they appear to have quite a few female employees. Also KiA has had tons of topics about the whole fine bros thing.
https://www.scribd.com/document/293326897/Oberlin-College-Black-Student-Union-Institutional-Demands
Page 11 is what you are looking for although many of the others are rather absurd as well
Also your second comment makes no sense why would I trust someone who is a proven liar?
Einstein was very mysoginist
>CONDITIONS
A. You will make sure:
- that my clothes and laundry are kept in good order;
- that I will receive my three meals regularly in my room;
- that my bedroom and study are kept neat, and especially that my desk is left for my use only.
B. You will renounce all personal relations with me insofar as they are not completely necessary for social reasons. Specifically, You will forego:
- my sitting at home with you;
- my going out or travelling with you.
C. You will obey the following points in your relations with me:
- you will not expect any intimacy from me, nor will you reproach me in any way;
- you will stop talking to me if I request it;
- you will leave my bedroom or study immediately without protest if I request it.
D. You will undertake not to belittle me in front of our children, either through words or behavior.
Then you should read a dictionary, because they say that the "reduce by one-tenth" meaning is obsolete:
>1. to destroy a great number or proportion of:
The population was decimated by a plague.
>2. to select by lot and kill every tenth person of.
>3. Obsolete. to take a tenth of or from.
But SJWs hate dictionaries so I don't expect you to do that.
I agree though I''m not sure there are as many 50 hour games as you think (plus at sites not every person reviews every single game).
4 days for a 20/25 hour or less game? not nearly so crazy.
2 days to play Tomb raider, two days to write
I agree that there are reasons to not like this but the "game reviewers have lives" argument doesn't really work considering its their job.
>as quickly as possible
review embargos do counteract this a bit
Audience ratings are significantly different than critic.
https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/warcraft/?search=warcraf
http://www.metacritic.com/movie/warcraft
There is an incredibly massive gap between what the audience thinks and what critics are saying.
Somebody hasn't been here for a day+, meanwhile it's abundantly clear by your submission history on this sub that you have no real job.
How's being a clever, crafty, stinky neckbeard with no job working out for you? This is my whole point RE: "internet Socrates" such as yourself.
>Someone really believes in selfhelp books if they are old enough.
That's funny, you think The Art of War is little more than a "self help" book. No wonder gatortrash are so easy, and have exactly zero clout anywhere that matters.
Somebody is butthurt that he was the target of my concern trolling and didn't see it :)
>Someone never read The Art of War, The 48 Laws of Power, or any similar shit.
Someone really believes in selfhelp books if they are old enough.
Only because you haven't experienced the joys of aebleskiver. I need an aebleskiver pan so I can make some. This one looks good.
KiA would hate this classic:
https://www.amazon.com/Unconventional-Family-Professor-Sandra-Lipsitz/dp/0300074247
Spoiler alert: The kids grew up fine. In the case of the son, better than fine. He's some sort of math prodigy.
> Look at the word in bold you big fucking dummy. Persecution is an infinitely broader concept than irrational fear. It is looking at the persecution of same sex relationships and using "homophobia" as a catch all title. I do not get why you are making this so fucking difficult. "-phobia" has, for a long fucking time, been used in various political contexts to refer to persecution that doesn't necessarily stem from irrational fear. It took me twenty seconds to find an example. For your sake, here's another:
Is it? If your argument is that all persecution is based on fear then it certainly isn't a broader concept in context. It took you 20 seconds to find something which wasn't an example, so if it's so easy to find an example I don't know why you would waste your time arguing instead of just finding a proper example.
Same problem as the last one, in context it could fit the proper definition and be fear related.
Same problem as the last two, in context it could fit the proper definition and be fear related. I don't think you understand what I mean by example of someone using it in a way that fits your definition.
I mean example of someone using it in a way that can't fit the old definition so it clearly is your definition.
>But that's true of this definition of Islamophobia too.
Um what?
> No, they're just hand-picked by the author for the sake of summarizing what the book is about.
No usually they are more about drawing attention then a summarization.
Oh shit is this the cavalry? Is it the phone a friend round of the retard olympics?
>refuses to read material when linked
I assure you I read all the material that was linked at this url http://www.amazon.com/Feminist-Theory-From-Margin-Center/dp/0896086135
For example I read this review
>I was saddened to read how boring and uninterested the author made the topic of feminism to be. I rented this book for one of my college courses, which I'm so thankful I only rented it because its def not worth purchasing. I did not enjoy how scattered and uneasy the material is to understand while reading. I have requested my college to restrain from using this text as part of the class curriculum.
It certainly sounds similar to the criticisms alot of feminists have of Anita's work.
Good job being wrong "bro".
This will make the third feminist theory on the topic of patriarchy I'll have read and dissected within 24 hours, but I guess when I'm done with Sherlock I'll give it a squizz. I'll probably even make it it's own post.
>reading her is worth your time in any regard
I am highly dubious, but we'll see.