What are /r/SpaceXMasterrace's favorite Products & Services?

From 3.5 billion Reddit comments

He can get a used copy of the Fundamentals of Astrodynamics on Amazon for just $16.95

Available at the Space Store and Amazon.
Thanks all for the support on this pet project so far!

Showing off real Martian terrain using the Mars Express HRSC (High Resolution Stereo Camera) surface and elevation data which is available as an add-on for Orbiter 2016: http://orbit.medphys.ucl.ac.uk/download.html

OK, it's done. https://hastebin.com/raw/dumizuweha <- this is the tesla version of the userscript, it should download the tesla logo from the update server on every run. It can be installed via greasemonkey/violentmonkey, although it's being mainly tested on violentmonkey. It does require an open tab with a logged in account to run. You can see which pixels it places in the dev console (F12) or see progress altogether by typing measure(); and pressing enter in the same place.

Android: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.PiGames.LunarLander&amp;pageId=102603232997411631552&amp;authuser=1
Game about glorius Space Y to praise the name of our savior Elon Musk by fanatics from PiGames.

Excellent question! I'm Jeff Who. In the government, if you want to move money to black ops, you use loopholes in regulations for federal contractors to shift money between divisions outside federal oversight.

Amazon uses secret products that if you buy them, it funnels profits directly to my BO. The BO project is funded entirely by sales of this product.

Weather wise, I think things look pretty good for January.

Precipitation

A wet day is one with at least 0.04 inches of liquid or liquid-equivalent precipitation. In South Padre Island, the chance of a wet day over the course of January is essentially constant, remaining around 13% throughout. For reference, the year's highest daily chance of a wet day is 39% on September 15, and its lowest chance is 9% on February 21.

Wind

This section discusses the wide-area hourly average wind vector (speed and direction) at 10 meters above the ground. The wind experienced at any given location is highly dependent on local topography and other factors, and instantaneous wind speed and direction vary more widely than hourly averages. The average hourly wind speed in South Padre Island is essentially constant during January, remaining within 0.1 miles per hour of 13.1 miles per hour throughout.

For reference, on April 26, the windiest day of the year, the daily average wind speed is 13.7 miles per hour, while on September 1, the calmest day of the year, the daily average wind speed is 10.5 miles per hour.

The lowest daily average wind speed during January is 13.0 miles per hour on January 12.

Source: https://weatherspark.com/m/7955/1/Average-Weather-in-January-in-South-Padre-Island-Texas-United-States

I don't know how to see average high altitude winds. Those are probably a greater factor.

Well, we can try this. We can do the same calculations for Earth instead of the moon by setting F*g* = 9.8 instead of 1.6, and we can neglect air resistance, because we're moving so slowly and we don't have a parachute, so it won't really affect anything. We'll just say that the top speed we can allow ourselves to reach is 53m/s, because that's what Wikipedia says is the terminal velocity of a human.

Again, we'll be using the equation vf^(2)=vi^(2)+2a𝚫y but this time, a will equal 9.8 instead of 1.6

v*f*^(2)=0+2(9.8)9

v*f*^(2)=176.4

v*f*=√176.4

v*f*≈13.3m/s impact velocity

That's about ~29.8 miles per hour. Much worse than the ~12 we were going on the moon. Again, this does neglect air resistance, but if we plug it in to this calculator and assume a 100kg human we see that our maximum velocity after 9 meters is 13.14m/s (~29.4mph), which is pretty close. That 0.4 miles per hour difference isn't going to change the outcome much.

According to godaddy.com:

Registrant Name: Andrew Rosener
Registrant Organization: Media Options S.A.
Registrant Street: Avenida Central
Registrant Street: San Felipe
Registrant City: Panama City
Registrant State/Province: Panama

which in turn appears to own a load of domains. starlink.com doesn't appear for sale.

LT;DR see openstreetmap.org

Open streetmap is many times more accurate in these kind of cases. University buildings, parks and places like this are updated by volunteers based on photo's and videos. At my local university there where even active debates about what the precise locations where of park benches. so enjoy. (The only down side is that openstreetmap is not good in directions and connection data like trains and busses so its hard to use as your daily driver)

https://www.openstreetmap.org/directions?route=%3B25.9895307344261%2C-97.1828117396032#map=16/25.9889/-97.1842

Hi! I'm afraid links are not allowed, but here it goes. I designed them because I could not find any nice space themed cookie cutters. They ended up looking very nice, thats why I posted the 3D printable files in Cults. Hope you like them!

https://cults3d.com/en/3d-model/home/space-cookie-cutter-set-spacex-nasa-fteryda-62ca

Hi! I'm afraid links are not allowed, but here it goes. I designed them because I could not find any nice space themed cookie cutters. They ended up looking very nice, thats why I posted them in Cults. Hope you like them!

https://cults3d.com/en/3d-model/home/space-cookie-cutter-set-spacex-nasa-fteryda-62ca

Didn't find many media stories besides this.

https://slashdot.org/story/14/05/07/0410242/nasa-france-skeptical-of-spacex-reusable-rocket-project

Even this one is just a link to a removed article.

It's possible that the articles were removed once spaceX became successful, OR more likely, it's not that articles were written about how "they'll never do X" It was more the public sentiment

Yep I bought one shortly after Starship was announced. It’s actually a decent shaker too. $32 on Amazon.

Irving Stainless Steel Rocket Cocktail Shaker by Viski - Cocktail Shaker with Strainer (24 oz. Capacity) https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00AB668P4/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_tai_YN8mDbCN6P5G8

More information on this mission patch and others can be found here.

I don't know - if we're going with solid metals I think I'd go this inanimate carbon rod (https://www.amazon.com/Carbon-Fiber-400mm-Length-Matte/dp/B08H1423MG/) seems both cheaper and more likely to save the day in a crisis.

It’s from Next Spaceflight (for iOS or Android)

More patch info can be found here for those curious.

Former Deputy Administrator of NASA (2009-2013) during the Obama Administration, controversial (but vindicated now) for her efforts to push NASA to pursue fixed cost commercial procurement programs, like Commercial Resupply Services and Commercial Crew. She was a key supporter of SpaceX early on at a time when there were a lot of skeptics about it at the time.

Anyhow, she has a new book out this week about the whole thing. The OP was clearly inspired by the new Off Nominal podcast with her earlier today.

I think it comes out on June 21^st.

Amazon: https://www.amazon.com/Escaping-Gravity-Quest-Transform-Launch/dp/1635767709

goodreads: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/59147660-escaping-gravity?from_search=true&amp;from_srp=1qdLOpSzur&amp;qid=2

> It’s because modern engineering standards make building a rocket like that illegal. We can build much better and safer rockets.

Could you expand on what you mean by "safer"? The Saturn V has a near-perfect operational record; the only real problems it ever encountered were during the uncrewed Apollo 6 test launch.

The F-1 and J-2 engines are both gas-generator type rocket engines and have perfect operational records—they are well-understood, well-tested, and well-regarded. There were never any safety issues with them.

The engineering on the Saturn V was extremely well considered, and there were significant and massive safety margins built into each stage—but especially the S-IC, which was almost overbuilt, per Cox &amp; Murray, who quote one of Von Braun's team as noting that they could easily cut thousands of additional pounds of weight from the S-IC if needed and still maintain margin.

It's more or less the safest and most successful rocket that's ever launched.

no and no

https://en.mapy.cz/zakladni?x=14.6840354&amp;y=49.7860921&amp;z=18&amp;pano=1&amp;pid=64613006&amp;yaw=2.889&amp;fov=0.457&amp;pitch=-0.100

I have this one only for the blueprint look if it, and the one I got is just white text and images not all of the colors https://www.amazon.com/dp/B09B43D86Y/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_glt_fabc_ZPA92FWP1ZQ0H5C28VJC

This is out now at the link below and officially in stock at THE SPACE STORE! https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B08SH41X22/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_asin_title_o01_s00?ie=UTF8&amp;psc=1

I used Google translate for the kanji. The top right is supposed to say Starship, but if you translate it back into english it comes out Spaceship. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

And the center bit says Mars.

It's also on a shirt, if you're into that kind of thing.

This is out now at the link below and soon on the Space Store. https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B08SH41X22/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_asin_title_o01_s00?ie=UTF8&amp;psc=1

Is your desktop? For real yo:

1) Apple. Just why.
2) Empty your inboxes. Both of them. Write your mom back. She misses you.
3) Who the fuck is Josh.
4) You're better of looking for girls in red on YouPorn.
5) Why don't you have a YouPorn tab open.
6) How do you Yahoo! so much. Is it 1998?
7) Holy fucking extensions.
8) Holy fucking bookmarks toolbar. Did Grammy install that for you?
9) NordVPN only works if you turn it on lol
10) DVD release dates? Is it 1999 already?
12) Plug in your laptop.
13) Go to bed.
14) In that order.
15) Thanks for the lolz. Hope I made u lol too. ;*

The App is called: Time Until (https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.brunoschalch.timeuntil&amp;hl=de) And yeah if something changes you have to manually edit the time. But i only add launches that have a more or less fixed date.;)