What are /r/AmericanPolitics' favorite Products & Services?

From 3.5 billion Reddit comments

What is with right wingers ...they used to just lie, now that make shit up from thin air.

>Indeed, your statement is Bull Shit.

Back your bullshit or STFU

https://www.scribd.com/document/319384834/IRS-Response-Clinton-Foundation-July-2016

https://www.healthcare.gov/health-care-law-protections/rights-and-protections/

Health insurance companies dropping people when they get sick or need care, having to sue the insurance company when they're contractually required to cover something and refuse to, and constant preexisting condition denial dance.

Since you don't seem to be aware of these things, I assume you're not an American, right?

>The media will uncover all the dirt anyway

read over this.. and tell us why the media ignored so much of it during the Republican primaries.

SUBVET45, The Bells Toll for Hillary @ Spectator.org

Here's how it works..

• 1 You create a separate foreign"charity" like the Clintons did in Canada.

• 2 Foreign oligarchs and Governments donate to the Canadian charity.

• 3 The charity then makes massive donations to the Clinton Foundation.

• 4 Canadian law prohibits the identification of individual donors.

• 5 10% goes to good works programs, the rest goes to the Clintons.

• 6 The Clinton Foundation finds "clerical errors," and re files 5 years of tax returns.

• 7 Net result -- tax free and untraceable foreign money goes into the Clinton's pockets.

This is textbook money laundering!

>A principle in the Canadian "charity" is one Frank Giustra who was central to Uranium One, a Canadian company that acquired massive US uranium interests and then sold them to Russia.

>The transaction required US State Department approval .. guess who was Secretary of State when the approval was granted?? ^Hillary:)

Hillary for Prison 2016!

> It’s entirely understandable that — to use an entirely hypothetical example — someone with the Southern Poverty Law Center might impersonate a fictional white supremacist to get into a private Ku Klux Klan chat room and see what those people are up to.

> But the US Department of Justice says it’s illegal (under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act) to evade terms of service with false identities.

There are huge problems with the US government contracting with private companies to siphon up huge amounts of private data.

This is not one of them.

White supremacist hubs like 4chan and 8chan don't have actual "terms of service", and what they do have in no way prevents one from anonymizing their own identity. Lying about one's identity is also not in the TOS here on reddit. Its not in the TOS for Parler or Gab.

Only creep websites like Facebook have TOS's tied to someone's real identity.

This whole article is stretch to say the least, and arguably an outright falsehood.

About a decade ago author and educational researcher Jonathan Kozol documented that American schools were just as segregated as they were during the "civil rights era." This was not a phenomenon of the deep south, but was done across the US.

Today we don't do it with crude laws. Today we do it with income disparities, "school choice" and magnet schools and other ways. It's the new "Jim Crow."

example

Famciclovir - antiviral i have to occsionaly buy for my cats with feline herpes virus when lysine isn't enough. also myself when cold sores break out with sore throat, runny nose

Chewy the pet site:

$39.60 60 tabs 500mg https://www.chewy.com/famciclovir-generic-tablets/dp/322063

goodrx 60 tabs 500mg https://www.goodrx.com/famciclovir?slug=famciclovir&form=tablet&dosage=500mg&quantity=60&label_override=famciclovir&sort_type=price

Hannaford Brothers Pharmacy $652 retail Save 94% $41.02

Shaws $366 retail Save 88% $44.01

Rite Aid $622 retail Save 92% $ 51.25

Walmart Neighborhood Market $624 retail Save 89% $67.14

Walmart $574 retail Save 88% $67.14

Target (CVS) $501 retail Save 67% $ 163.16

CVS Pharmacy $501 retail Save 67% $163.16

Walgreens $511 retail Save 57% $ 221.19

here's hoping mark cuban's pharmacy will keep adding meds and beat goodrx and pet pharmacies too as well with his limiting it to a 15% markup

of course any other billionaire could beat him by doing the same then only marking it up 10% :o

No I'm not.

>John Brennan told the Senate intelligence committee Thursday that CIA has no evidence of a connection between Omar Mateen and the Islamic State

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jun/16/cia-orlando-shooter-omar-mateen-isis-pulse-nightclub-attack

stiglitz is the enemy:

he is in bed with those who are rigging it.

https://sorosfiles.com/soros/2011/10/the-revolutionary-socialism-of-soros-adviser-joseph-stiglitz.html

https://www.bitchute.com/video/6hzTmCDidxXn/

solipsism: "a theory holding that the self can know nothing but its own modifications and that the self is the only existent thing; also : extreme egocentrism"

Lol

https://www.amazon.com/Indoor-Outdoor-Banner-Endorses-Campaign/dp/B08F5C8KSX

Right wing establishment media and social media never called for the cancelling and silencing of people who said fuck Trump. Me included.

Left wing media on the other hand...

I hate cnn but it was the easiest to find. Look it up for yourself.

https://edition.cnn.com/2018/06/22/politics/impeach-trump-nixon-support-bill-clinton-poll/index.html

I take exception to your comment. My personal definition of editorialize is no different than the dictionary definition presented here.

>ed·i·to·ri·al·ize (d-tôr--lz, -tr-) intr.v. ed·i·to·ri·al·ized, ed·i·to·ri·al·iz·ing, ed·i·to·ri·al·iz·es

>1. To express an opinion in or as if in an editorial.

>2. To present an opinion in the guise of an objective report.

The title I attached to this article differed from that supplied differed by only six words - "without even a trace of irony." While those words are my own they only call to light in a sardonic fashion the apparent lack of awareness of the widow in question of the irony of her statement. The irony is real. Her obliviousness is real. Where is the opinion that you makes you condemn the submission?

I am not fan of the liberties taken in r/politics either but this is nothing like what is done over there. If the policy of r/americanpolitics is that the submitter must copy the title in the news source verbatim then that should be stated in the sidebar rather than what is there. I make this point because I had another submission called out previously when I replaced the given title with the author's OWN WORDS from within the article. How is using the author's words editorializing?

Parenthetically, the following is entirely my own opinion:

You are taking this 'no editorializing' policy to absurd extremes.

It's not down: http://www.isitdownrightnow.com/cfpub.epa.gov.html

Report: http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/hfstudy/recordisplay.cfm?deid=244651

Facts are bias, that's a fact.

So, you admit that you can't disprove Factcheck? Thanks for proving the article is factual.

You look up the book on Amazon and the guy they use for a quote is Mencius Moldbug (Curtis Guy Yarvin), the man who gave us the "Dark Enlightenment" during the Obama years. That the blurb mentions "detrimental robots" makes me ask, is this guy up on the Shaver Mystery, does he believe that there are underground robots in caverns or is it a metaphor?

> "Why did Europeans rule the world, more or less, at one time? Because of Evolution and they were superior, or because God blessed them?"

So either whites are naturally superior or are superior because God has given some special blessing to whites? I reject both racist options. And so does science. Guns, Germs, and Steel is a good place to start informing yourself about these things before you put your foot in your mouth again.

What evidence do you have that Americans are "a good population of reasonable people"? I'd like to hear it--especially as to the reasonable part. I don't doubt that many amazing things are theoretically possible. But I don't see any reason to assume that today's Americans are poised to bring the amazing about. Show me some evidence that I'm wrong--that a majority, or at least a strong plurality, support the New Deal era socialism described in the petition and will be able to vote that belief in the money-corrupted political situation as it currently exists.

Check out The Populist Movement by Lawrence Goodwyn. It's a fantastic example of how a corrupted political-economic system relentlessly destroys idealistic pluralities that actually do manage to organize.

Show me a President Sanders backed by nation-wide, grassroots movement and I'll reexamine my thinking. Until then, I see no reason to think that such a convention would result in anything other than the worst of corporate-greed and popular-fears enshrined into law.

[Edit]: The system is absolutely not designed to let the states do what they want. That was the whole point of the Constitution replacing the Articles of Confederation. It centralized power. It's authors wanted centralized power.

Furthermore, people don't agree on why the federal government is tired and stagnant. Most people don't think it's because the New Deal didn't go far enough.