> it is very hard to even interview people who are 'white'
This is going to work out sooo well medium term. Esp for a company providing a service with low barrier to entry. Anybody can set up a Git server, or many. In fact a number of other companies are offering Git hosting.
EDIT: They don't have lock-in either. Pulling a project down from Github and pushing it to another remote provider takes only a few minutes, and that customer is gone.
Perhaps it's time for a significant tech company to implode undeniably because of SJW meddling, and serve as an example to other weak CEOs and stupid investors.
Also get disciplined about saving every video you like. I just started using YTDL-GUI and it's boomer-easy to use. Works on every video site I've thrown at it so far.
(With pictures!)
(Protip: Donate to internet archive. You can donate in bitcoins!)
There's an amazingly good bit of standup by Bill Burr, where he talks about wife beating. You can watch here. Here are some relevant bits:
> So at the end of the hour, they come to the relevant conclusion: There is no reason to hit a woman.
> And I was just like, REALLY?! I could give you like 17, right off the top of my head.
You could wake me from a drunken stupor, and I could still give you nine.
Dude, there's plenty of reasons to hit a woman, you just don't do it!
But to sit there and suggest that there's no reason, dude, the level of ego behind that statement ... what are you, levitating above the rest of us?
You're never annoying?
...
How about this? You fall in love, you marry a girl, you buy her a house, you go to work every day paying off the house, you come home one day she's banging the neighbor, hands you divorce papers, you gotta move out, sleep on a futon, and still pay for that house that she's gonna stay in.
No Reason.
I'm not saying you should do it, but there's plenty of reasons in that arc of a story.
-==-
Violence against women might seem very different from antisemitism, but let's look at both as exercises of power.
What prompts them? Do wife beatings just fall out of the sky? Do no Jews ever do anything which draws the ire of their host societies?
Just some food for thought.
Spending time away from screens in more natural environments should help. Go on long hikes with your cellphone turned off.
Do you get enough sleep? Install f.lux on your computer. If you have any LED bulbs at home make sure those are 'warm' colors not the cool 'daylight' colors. You'll sleep better.
Meditate, practice some martial art.
>most of reddit does not like /r/darkenlightenment
They know of it? Anyway, my previous comment,
If you're going for the suffragette and suffragist distinction, they're even more unbearable and even retarded the suffrage cause in UK.
The problem is that most of the folks don't get that even the first wave feminists were two faced lying cunts, the myth lives on despite the fact that you would find this 1913 document quite similar to today's reality.
I've been meaning to write an article saying much the same, but this author does it better than I could.
Despite that the practice of monogamy as enforced by the institution of marriage is predicated on Christian dogma, it has a profoundly civilising effect upon those who practice it, as it moves us further from our natural state of polygamy/hypergamy.
Here is an excerpt from a short story I started writing, but never finished.
Here we go again, because the bot removed my comment because it was too short. I wrote about this a few weeks ago from an ancap perspective (I'm not an ancap btw). Maybe some of you find what I had to say interesting enough to give this a read:
I read the article posted to Jacobitemag.com by one Jonty Tiplady, the article they had published before this one. Holy shit, I could not tell you what that article is about. I only rarely see such forays into post-modern Derridaen autism
and this paper she published? :https://www.academia.edu/36163620/BEYOND_THE_DEATH_DRIVE_2016_draft
just what the hell am I getting myself into?
This course presents interesting math, modeling (Schelling, and Granovetter) such sorting behavior. It turns out such maps form as a result of even slight preferences, no need for wild 'raycissm'.
I got my versions on Amazon.
https://www.amazon.com/dp/1628451270/ref=cm_sw_r_sms_awdb_F8rLyb0Z22CPT
https://www.amazon.com/Perspectives-World-History-Decline-West-2/dp/1628450320
Been reading them since august. Almost finished now. It's a heavy read, a little out of my comfort zone just due to complexity of sentence structure. Incredible nonetheless.
To be honest I'm not sure if I would call a lot of the fiction I read "literature", but I would probably split it up like 10% theory, 45% scholarship, 45% literature.
Favorite works of literature: My favorites are the stories of Jorge Luis Borges. I have also greatly enjoyed the works of HP Lovecraft, Thus Spake Zarathustra (maybe that counts as theory?), That Hideous Strength by C.S. Lewis, Blindsight by Peter Watts, various short stories by Isaac Asimov, The Pale King by David Foster Wallace, A Song of Ice and Fire by George R.R. Martin. I like a lot of fiction, though.
I have not read very much written before the Victorian era: Dante's Inferno, Don Quixote, The Bible, The Art of War, a few of Plato's dialogues, about half of The Prince. I've started The Odyssey, the Aeneid, and the Leviathan, but I never got very far into any of them.
Honestly, all of the works that I think are important to neoreaction would fall under the category of theory.
I ended up doing a reverse image search, found the 404, then put the URL in the way back machine to find it.
https://web.archive.org/web/20141009003949/http://andrewgelman.com/2008/08/03/the_mythical_ga/
Please, educate yourself on this topic
Thanks interesting stuff.
> Their geographical borders changed after 1939, with the molitov ribbentrop pact where the Western portion of ukraine was added from Poland.
Yes, the source apparently excludes data earlier than 1959 because of inconsistency reasons. Here's the table. In Reference N7, they say: "Note 3: The 1926 and 1939 censuses have been excluded from the results due to the changing geographical boundaries of Russia around that period (or RSFSR as it was known at the time).".
I understand that Ukraine went independent in 1991 after the fall of the Soviet Union. I also understand that before that year, Ukrainians considered themselves as Russian. However even though it was the "Ukraine SSR" as part of being Russia before 1991, and "Ukraine" on and after 1991, both pre and post-1991 areas are comparable in the sense that they contain roughly the same demographic population under roughly the same area of land. So it's consistent as far as I can see in terms of comparing ethnicities before and after this date. I mean do you think the ethnicities explicitly stated in the very original source (demoscope.ru) are misleading in some way?
In my site stats feedly comes up alot, and I think that is what it is. I haven't personally tried it yet though.
Pocket also seems related but I am less sure how it works:
The Morton-skulls make an appearance in the article. There has been a lot of back-and-forth over the years on whether or not Morton forged the results of his skull-packing activities. The most recent paper is Weisberg's Remeasuring man in the journal Evolution & Development.
There is a similar incident known as the "Burt-Affair," when Cyril Burt was shown to have forged numbers in his twin-studies of IQ. Given that we now know people with identical DNA often have quite different IQ scores, whatever an IQ test is measuring, it doesn't appear to be something related to the physiology of a person.
> The whole article is great, but at the end there is a point where he talks about the Left and the Right as things decompose. The Left cheers on the decomposition as we see in our present world. The Right wishes to recapture control and force things back into order. But the Right, even if it gets the chance to reorder things has arrived too late as the true natural hierarchy is organic and cannot be forced from above, so the Rights last gasp tends to fail to actually restore inner order.
> We do appear to be heading toward the natural end which is chaotic violence everywhere with no way to slow it down.
> Expect things to get crazier and crazier as the decomposition continues.
> It's a rather bleak assessment... a "Dark Enlightenment" of the future.
If you're interested, here is another one of his essays I posted over on /r/sorceryofthespectacle - <strong>Apocalyptic Intimations: Rene Girard and the End of Utopia</strong>
https://nitter.net/20committee/status/819024073523101696
>4chan is not MI6/SIS. I understand these key distinctions are opaque for those living in mom's basement.
​
Generally the whole point of free speech is for the people in the positions to do something about an issue would be to respond properly, not defensively, to criticism.
Gab is a social media site like many others, it lets users post content and such, but they are committed to free speech. This of course means that people are able to say politically incorrect things which the powers that be HATE.
They have recently been under assault by having their domain registrar bail on them, patreon and other funding companies wont support them etc.
Before we break our arms jerking ourselves off over this most excellent list of sources, I'd like to recommend getting a copy of Philip J Philippe Rushton's Race, Evolution and Behavior. Amazon link here
Knowing the facts is one thing, but being able to properly articulate them is another.
Ultimately you're going to win more people with a more balanced approach though. IQ is not 100% genetically determined. There is some amount of influence that people have over their own intelligence. Through school and education, you can influence yourself.
So it's partly genetic, and partly culture. But to say it's all culture is insane, and what's been going on now for a while.
Its about the biological causes of sex differences in intelligence. It can be found on amazon, and many other sites. Go to amazon for the kindle.
Seeking political power is the antithesis of moldbuggian thought. A better alternative looks like this.
You might not think to pay a road tax...but you'll think to spend your money on the things that do directly benefit you. If my company delivers pizzas to you...then will I gain or lose revenue by spending my taxes on road maintenance? Will I gain or lose revenue by spending my money on more anchovies?
The alternative is for Elizabeth Warren to try and ensure that my company has the combination of public inputs that will maximize productivity/revenue. This system would obamerate myself and millions of others...
>What is the species of domestic industry which his capital can employ, and of which the produce is likely to be of the greatest value, every individual, it is evident, can, in his local situation, judge much better than any statesman or lawgiver can do for him. The statesman who should attempt to direct private people in what manner they ought to employ their capitals would not only load himself with a most unnecessary attention, but assume an authority which could safely be trusted, not only to no single person, but to no council or senate whatever, and which would nowhere be so dangerous as in the hands of a man who had folly and presumption enough to fancy himself fit to exercise it. - Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nations
As the (hypothetical) owner of a pizza company...nobody would have more incentive than I would to diligently determine the balance of public inputs that would maximize my revenue.
Given that I am not really the owner of a pizza company...I only have the vaguest idea what that balance might be. But I thoroughly understand how absolutely absurd it is for 500 congresspeople to try and determine the optimal balance of public inputs for millions and millions of companies around the country.
Measuring "best" is difficult. Overly simplified, in nature there are two evolutionary tactics. The first is what you propose, which basically means have less offspring make them higher quality offspring.
The second tactic is what I call pump and dump. Have as many offspring as quickly as possible. Don't waste time educating them.
In Vietnam I am not just talking about the US involvement. The French where fighting there a total war for 100 years. Environment is everything. The Art of War repeatedly states the good general should always fight on ground which favors him. For the pump and dump society, bombing it is futile. It actually benefits the primitive society. The bomb crater from a B52 clears the jungle, makes a nice pond which now is full of shrimp, small fish and other yummy things to eat.
> As far as empiricism goes, history has just about proven that larger, more innovative economies trump large populations, especially in the long run.
No it doesn't. How old is western culture ? How old is the Austonesian culture ? Who has a greater population :-)
There is no such thing as Einstinean 4D space. The thing is completely insane. Einstein is/was mainly pushed by the (((media))).
https://www.amazon.com/Relativity-Reexamined-Leon-Brillouin/dp/0124337783
https://www.amazon.com/Causality-Electromagnetic-Induction-Gravitation-Gravitational/dp/0917406230/
Matter/space are both polarities of one thing. They are inextricable not time which is just a measurement. You can't have space without matter. Time is simply the measurement of movement. Objects are born, reach, maturity and then die in a cycle. That is what time measures.
Read Walter Russell. Real science which is based on the never ending movement between the two polarities underlying existence. Masculine/feminine, contraction/expansion, yin/yang, centripetal/centrifugal. Order collapses into decay and is reborn.
Actually, company towns varied considerably. Just like regular towns, there were good, mediocre, and abhorrent company towns to live in. http://www.amazon.com/The-Company-Town-Industrial-American/dp/0465018262#productDescription_secondary_view_div_1452317382125
> effects of the 20th century wars on the gene pool in the UK and USA especially
I haven't seen any studies, but the world wars must have had a significant effect. The sad part is that all of it was mostly unnecessary. In spite of what is taught in schools today, Germany and Japan weren't the only ones responsible. British leadership and the usual suspects are likely deserve a similar amount of blame. But history is written by the victors.
Parkinson wrote his book in the 60s. It's still a hilarious and accurate description of bureaucracies incl corporate ones.
basically a bunch of leftwing jews infiltrating genuine conservatism and destroying it from within.
Norman Podhoretz HATES Western Civilization and non-jews. Part of why he was (and is) a strident supporter of mass immigration of non-whites into the US.
Neocons are NOT right wing or conservatives in any real sense, and certainly not NRx.
PS: The best book on NeoCons is by Paul Gottfried: http://www.amazon.com/Leo-Strauss-Conservative-Movement-America/dp/1107675715
This is the kind of thing I see coming from most "transhumanists." http://www.amazon.com/From-Transgender-Transhuman-Manifesto-Freedom/dp/0615489427
Its written by the highest paid female CEO in the US, who used to be a man. That's a major leader of transhuman ideology.