What is Reddit's opinion of
finbox?
From 3.5 billion Reddit comments
100 reviews of this app found across Reddit:
You’re partially right: TRADITIONAL car manufacturers have really low margin.
Tesla margins are at least 3x better with some sources estimating to be as high as 29%.
Sources: https://www.teslarati.com/tesla-record-q1-2021-gross-margin-average-cost-decrease/
A quick google will answer your question. Apple paid 9.68 billion in Corp income tax in 2020. But don’t let facts get in the way of your feelz.
https://finbox.com/NASDAQGS:AAPL/explorer/inc_tax
Edit: Because I know you’re all lazy, here’s a link.
Since IPO PDX's profit margin has declined year on year actually: https://finbox.com/OM:PDX/explorer/gp_margin
Not sure how that fits into your 'focus on max profits>product' theory.
I did a much more detailed sum of the parts calculation at one point, but the 30 second version can be seen on these pages. Using the revenue multiple ev/rev (enterprise value/revenue) of 2.0x, $gme should trade around $120-150. However if you look at chewy, they use a 4.0x multiple. Apple uses as high as 7 something. This means if people start valuing GameStop as a growth company, the stock should be worth $300-700. And this is excluding the big counsel wave since only one quarter of next wave sales have made it into their financials. And it’s also excluding the drastic revenue impact that all this GameStop hype worldwide will bring. $300 a share is fair today, but I’ll have a hard time selling for anything less than $6-900
After this GME saga is done, can we talk about why these hedge fund assholes are shorting the shares of a company that's ending the pandemic? Pfizer short ratio seems pretty high. I'm fully vaccinated tho, so I may be wrong: https://finbox.com/NYSE:PFE/explorer/short_ratio
> I don't dispute that it's working (although given the CW's reputation perhaps it's not working as well as they think)
Reputation is one thing...profits are another. They make $2.459 billion a year.
>I'm simply suggesting that a different business model could potentially work even better.
If Taco Bell switched to fine dining, it COULD work...but what they're doing now is working, so why dramatically change it?
>Companies that never try anything new do not last long. Not taking risks is a risk on its own.
Again, $2.4 billion in profit...I'm not saying I like what they're doing...I don't watch any of their shows...but their business model is clearly working.
>Margins on their goods are so tight that volume would have to triple to move the needle
Cite your source, faggot.
Procter & Gamble's latest twelve months gross profit margin is 51.2%.
Imagine thinking 51.2% is low margin.
Most of the time when this has come up in the past, it's been people comparing the 5 year to 1 year beta.
1 year beta is -4.62.
https://www.infrontanalytics.com/fe-EN/65243NU/AMC-Entertainment-Holdings-Inc-/Beta
5 year beta is 1.33
https://finbox.com/NYSE:AMC/explorer/beta
1 year is more relevant because it reflects more of a focus on this movement.
Well I'll just grab a quick link for that 20%:
https://finbox.com/NASDAQGS:TSLA/explorer/gp_margin
Overall, 20% is a pretty nice number to go with. Where did that 100% number come from, right out your own ass?
And if the value in 10 years is projected to hopefully reach that high, why is the stock CURRENTLY being valued at that? Is it going to just sit at 1.2k for an entire decade now? Everybody else in these comments seems to be saying Tesla stock will be worth 10x more in a decade, so now in 10 years you'd need to justify a 12T market cap? Making one company worth more than 50% of the entire US...
Yeah, if anyone thinks that Disney is the scary 800-pound gorilla because of its $350B market cap, Amazon's is $1.6 <strong><em>trillion</em></strong>. (Meanwhile, Apple? 2.1 trillion.)
Amazing write up. The only thing that bothers me about it is if Kenny is turning junk bonds into real assets, why short Gamestop? All of their brick and mortar locations are typically in a mall or strip mall where they would be renting out the space and not the owner of the property. And according to what I was able to google (https://finbox.com/NYSE:GME/explorer/real_estate) GME has no meaningful real estate holdings.
all of the data is available for publicly listed companies through their financial reports, such as the 8-k (press releases), 10-q (quarterly result) and 10-k (fiscal year results). Note, that foreign companies do not have to file quarterlies in the US, but have to file annual reports (20-f).
Here's Amazon's 2nd quarter results.
The easiest way to find financial reports for a specific company is to go to their investor relations (IR) page and go to financial results or SEC filings (US listed companies) and click on the report.
Another easy way to get US listed company results is through the SEC's EDGAR system.
Reuters and Yahoo finance have all of the financials already laid out and will display the 3 major financial statements (Income statement, balance sheet, and cash flow statement). Finbox is another site that has all of the financial data. If you want margins and adjusted metrics, those sites could have them or I'd google it and some site will have it.
PE and PB are IMO still a bit high relative to the history. I think the stock can drop even further. I would be more comfortable to buy it at around $525. See https://finbox.com/NYSE:SAM/models/pb-multiples for a quick valuation.
Seeing as they have a 51% profit margin I would say they can afford it. It certainly would not bankrupt them. Plus, a slight raise in price is something I and many Americans would be willing to pay. They raise prices every once in a while anyway with no explanation, at least this one would be for a noble cause
What do you think of $FL?
Some DCF (https://finbox.com/NYSE:FL/models/dcf-growth-exit-5yr) gives a large upside. There is no debt. PE ratio is low historically https://ycharts.com/companies/FL/pe_ratio.
The worry I have is that this business is cyclical and the earnings are predicted to drop so the DCF is misleading https://www.marketbeat.com/stocks/NYSE/FL/earnings/. Are there better valuation methods?
Here's my super bull forecast. This is if it grows revenue to become as big as eBay is now. I'm in at 166. They don't spend anything on capex so they can just buy growth.
https://finbox.com/s/m-f8301bf0
I also gave it a 20 multiple which is probably too low. You can see that it goes up 25% at 25 and 50% at 30.
Interesting, pulling up the fin box model for the 10 year DCF they’ve got it pegged at $332 but they’ve got a relatively stable growth rate of 20ish percent for a few years followed by a gradual decline over the decade. Not really sure how reasonable maintaining a 20% rev growth YoY through 2025 is though tbh.
The China factor makes it a wild card though.
I'm slightly more bulish. My DCF model puts at the stock at 388$, FinBox at 428$ (https://finbox.com/NYSE:LMT/models/dcf-revenue-exit-5yr) and StockAnalysis at 413.35$ (https://stockanalysis.com/stocks/LMT/). On average I find the average/median upside ~20%. Maybe if it drops another 5-10% $LMT would be a good buy.
https://finbox.com/NYSE:AMC/explorer/shares_float_pct
Last night finbox had the percentage of float shares / outstanding at 73%. So 73% of 339M + the 44M of Silverlake dilution from yesterday.
IDK I’m still slightly retarded and ate paint chips as a child. So take this blind advice from a stranger with 50 karma put it in your pipe and smoke it brother. I still love this stock tho!!!
Because it's a growth stock not an income play... If you wait for them to report profits, you will be buying fair market value or overpaying.
Revenue growing at an accelerated rate over expenses is the only principle you need. Projecting $2B in revenue 2022 with $600M free cash flow.
Here yah be:
- JPG: https://imgur.com/a/7345aDn
- Chart source @ https://finbox.com/NASDAQGS:AAPL/charts/c-ublba2xy
Source-data behind finbox paywall so couldn't overlay the Top-10 summation curve as you suggested.
I too prefer to consume my data in a single plot rather than animation when possible.
It is accurate, in corporate accounting there's what's known as an effective tax rate, which is the tax rate after expenses have been deducted from earnings. This explains their historical tax rates, while you're right that they have paid 15% in some years, 2018 for example saw an effective tax rate of 1.2% and even 15% is roughly half what a lot of hard working Americans pay in income tax.
> Intel's latest twelve months gross profit margin is 57.9%.
> Intel's gross profit margin for fiscal years ending December 2015 to 2019 averaged 61.4%.
Source: https://finbox.com/NASDAQGS:INTC/explorer/gp_margin
Additional source (historic trend): https://ycharts.com/companies/INTC/gross_profit_margin
SG&A (includes marketing) and R&D (upwards of 20-25% for many tech companies, except Apple) are costs not included in calculating gross margins.
https://finbox.com/NASDAQGS:TSLA/explorer/price_to_sales_fwd
Tesla's current price to forward sales is 16.9x , check the link above. I stand by my calculation of using 15x for Xos.
Tesla's price to sales ratio will eventually go down to 10x in five years, but that is not my scope. I am worried about the stock price this year.
Xos has currently 2000 units production capacity as stated by the presentation. I have used a conservative 1600 units approach. As per the price of vehicles, we can already see advertaised price for step up van at $125k. So there again I have rounded down to $100k keeping in mind volume rebates, and again being conservative...
I have not included revenue from services, such as charging stations, software subscriptions, and financing.
So really, I dont think I am cooking the numbers to paint a pretty picture. If anything, I am low balling the estimates.
Meta Platforms's index membership is Nasdaq 100, Russell 1000, Nasdaq Composite, S&P 500 Communication Services Sector, Russell 3000, S&P 100 and S&P 500.
Do you simp for multinational companies for free or do you get anything out of it? https://finbox.com/NASDAQGS:INTC/explorer/effect_tax_rate. They pay a lower tax rate than a lot of working class people.
They borrowed a ton of money to make their shows, and plan on borrowing even more in the future. Now the interest rate is going up, so future borrowing costs will go up. Without raising prices, it may become unsustainable for them.
Without new contents, the subscribers will certainly unsubscribe en mass, and Netflix will go belly up.
I have currently no position in MRNA (or any other vaccine maker). Pharma is always super volatile. While you're right that the phase of hyper growth due to their COVID vaccine is over, Moderna is still growing and mRNa technlogy will have new applications. More vaccines for different types of viruses, including the common cold and the flu, maybe even promising immune modulating drugs to fight cancer.
Forward P/E estimates look healthy (https://finbox.com/NASDAQGS:MRNA/explorer/pe_fwd). They'll likely also going to keep selling and milking COVID vaccines, similarly to yearly flu shots, for years to come.
If its getting even lower I might consider it as a value play.
I usually just use black-box DCF models that I find since I'm not an analyst. Using a 5 year DCF growth - with GME - the traditional models show current value in the $7 to $9 share range. If you want to apply a 5x to 10x premium for hype and other nonsense - maybe the stock is worth around $50-$70 - imo. Usually - I will compare the online model by running it through other companies to see what the variance is like. This is the model that I used - https://finbox.com/NYSE:GME/models/dcf-growth-exit-5yr
I agree that FB is very weirdly valued, but the metaverse is far from being a certain cash cow yet. Where as electrification of the entire car industry is inevitable, and Tesla is leading the way IMO
To be on par with Amazon a P/E of 100 seems reasonable IMO. https://finbox.com/NASDAQGS:AMZN/explorer/pe_ltm
2022 100 P/E will give a stock price in the range 900-1200 (depending on what EPS you expect).
I'm not sure I agree with the revenues being 5% YoY. I'd give it 10% actually as a conservative estimate.
The EBITDA YoY is 15% and the revenue YoY is ~12% (over the past 10 years).
Keep in mind that the management has been buying back like 1-2% of their stock. And they did so even in the past quarter, even when the value of the share was around 140. I don't think Apple management is greedy to buy back when its overvalued.
I also calculate their EITR (incomeTaxExpense / incomeBeforeTax) as ~13% but in some other places, you can see they never really pay more than 6% per year (https://finbox.com/NASDAQGS:AAPL/explorer/inc_tax). I'm not sure how you calculate that in your own valuation.
Your capex seems to be a little high as well. Why the jump from 11.1 - 19? In tech, usually capex is 15-25% of operating cash flow.
Those are probably a few of the glaring factors but if I calculate based on my own assumptions and a few other factors, I come out with a $210 FMV.
>But i dont now how you get around the fact that more potential consumers is precisely what motivates increasingly unsustainable supplying of goods/services
Actually, it's extremely easy to get around. Using Shell as an example since you did, do you reckon they had a 22% profit margin last year because they have no choice but to be unsustainable?
Quite literally, I speak entirely without exaggeration, or lies, and having done the necessary research: the individual citizen is not at fault, and these companies have spent massive amounts of time, money, and effort disseminating the idea that the average citizen is at fault. Because when this all started, we immediately identified who was the cause of global warming because it was so obvious that even a child could figure it out if they were given all the information; and they really didn't like what environmental activists were doing to their bottom line, so they sowed seeds of guilt in the general population.
The only people that could make a noticeable impact on climate change by not having children are the CEO's of large companies, because then they would have no one to inherit. Anyone else? Not even a drop in the bucket.
That's hilarious. I spent some time digging into that and "Days to cover 3m (on loan)" is:
> How many days of average volume the current shares on loan equate too. This average daily volume is based on the 3 month daily volume for the given security across exchanges. Days To Cover (DTC) is also know as Short Interest Ratio.
So the ratio will spike when volume drops, even if short interest stays the same.
The 3m average daily volume for GME was 27M shares in January, 26M in April, down to about 6M in July, and under 3M back in October. Right now it's around 2.5M.
So even if the short interest was stable (which it is, according to their image), you can expect the DTC to rise since April as the volume dropped.
The other funny thing about that chart is that the DTC at the spike at the end of the chart is a little over 4. That's 4 days to cover all shorts at average daily volume over the past 4 months. But there have been around 4-5 days over the past 6 months where the volume for a single day was over 4x the average daily. So it's not a rare occurrence or something that would trigger a short squeeze, let alone a MOASS. And between Feb and June, the DTC was less than one... which means shorts could have covered with less trades than the average daily volume...
Actual Sources:
What in the hell are you talking about? Amazon's profit margin averages around 38% over the last five years, with earnings in the billions of dollars.
In this case the patient is still paying. The production cost for a year's supply of RHI (insulin) was about $70.00 as of 2018.. In this case, at $30/mo the patient will be paying $360/yr. If we estimate production costs at 50% of the price of the insulin (to account for distribution and overhead), that would still result in an annual profit margin of 257%. For reference, Apple's estimated annual gross profit margin is usually in the area of 30%, but then you can decide not to buy an iPhone.
Take this with a grain of salt, but FinBox rev multiple model has selected LTM multiple of 6.1x, and a selected forward multiple of 3.9x, but their input projections on their 5Y DCF revenue exit model are way lower, they're projecting less than half of what you're expecting for 2022 & 2023. But you can edit their models and add your own assumptions to get a fair value calc pretty quickly.
Data is sourced from S&P Global Market Intelligence
This CGC DCF Revenue exit model on FinBox has CGC projected to grow revenue from 577M to almost 2.5B by 2026.
It claims to source its data from S&P global market intelligence, but I’m curious where their projections are coming from. $TLRY isn’t even close to having that kind of projected growth, so I’m not sure what’s going on there.
I’m almost tempted to start an extremely speculative long term position in CGC if it goes much lower. That shit isn’t disappearing any time soon, they have more cash than debt on the balance sheet, not to mention the backing (read: bagholding) of Constellation.
Fundamentals are general poor across the board, and weedstonks are kinda dumb in general, but eventually they will sell off to a point where it might be lucrative.
Probably not a good idea anytime soon though
Hahaha, your right, but also wrong. Margin is not necessarily a growing company, you can grow margin by reducing costs as well.
Apple grew the most in 2011 with 67.59% on the year. Their best 10 year stretch of revenue was from 2005-2015 of 32% compounded annual growth rate.
Apple's latest revenue growth certainly is MASSIVE for the company. Downright impressive honestly, but I will point out:
"Apple's revenue growth for fiscal years ending September 2017 to 2021 averaged 11.8%." https://finbox.com/NASDAQGS:AAPL/explorer/total\_rev\_growth#:\~:text=Apple's%20latest%20twelve%20months%20revenue,ending%20September%202017%20to%202021.
I don't mind people taking me for a fool, I love comparing things. You and this entire sub may disagree with my thoughts and that is totally fine.
Apple having 200B cash is fairly similar to PLTR having 2B based on total revenue:
AAPL 200B cash /83.36B Rev = 2.4 cash to rev
PLTR 2B cash / 1.4B ish TTM rev = 1.4 cash to rev. Should that be compared? not really. Did I just do it? yes.
You are constantly comparing PLTR to TWTR - I think that's great. SBC should be a concern and TWTR is a great example, but that also doesn't take into account trade ratios. Honestly, TWTR looks way more attractive now at a Price to Sales of 7.56ish versus what it was when it IPO'd - 18.23, but I've never done a deep dive into TWTR and if I want to invest there. If you want to add to the TWTR comparison, even with SBC they would be well over 80 if they kept the P/S ratio of 18.
​
Feel free to disregard my statements, realistically it doesn't matter what I think (or any of us think) anyway.
Untaxed gains due to not realizing them is a tax loophole. I don't see how explaining the loophole makes it anything but a loophole for the rich to exploit.
And, as a side note, Tesla pays almost no tax, and certainly lower tax rate than most Americans. https://finbox.com/NASDAQGS:TSLA/explorer/effect_tax_rate
https://finbox.com/NYSE:TM/explorer/gp_margin#:~:text=Toyota%20Motor's%20latest%20twelve%20months,ending%20March%202017%20to%202021. Toyota's gross margin hasn't really grown in the past 3 years. Our conversation was about gross margins. That's what the context was when I said no growth. You'd be an idiot to invest in a single company for long term growth? Warren Buffet would disagree. https://youtu.be/ZJzu_xItNkY Whatever, man. I don't have time to explain how wrong you are anymore. You can say all you want that I don't have logic in my conclusions, but the truth is people have been saying the same nonsense that you have for Tesla's entire history. Those same people look like idiots right now as Tesla sits at $1T market cap. Grow some balls. I invest into the companies or stocks that I have high conviction in. If you don't have high conviction in Tesla's continued growth, that's fine. But you better believe I'll be back in this thread the day it hits $2T MC.
Wow, ok. If that is an item of national interest you, then I think we are done. Regarding profit margin, see link: https://finbox.com/NYSE:MCD/explorer/gp_margin#:~:text=McDonald's's%20gross%20profit%20margin%20for,in%20June%202021%20at%2053.2%25. "Performance Summary McDonald's's latest twelve months gross profit margin is 53.2%. McDonald's's gross profit margin for fiscal years ending December 2016 to 2020 averaged 48.4%."
"Return on Invested Capital For British American Tobacco p.l.c. (BTI) | finbox.com" https://finbox.com/NYSE:BTI/explorer/roic#:~:text=British%20American%20Tobacco's%20return%20on,2016%20to%202020%20averaged%209.0%25.&text=British%20American%20Tobacco's%20return%20on%20invested%20capital%20decreased%20in%202016,7.8%25%2C%20%2B...).
No it's not?
>Walmart's gross profit margin for fiscal years ending January 2017 to 2021 averaged 25.1%. Walmart's operated at median gross profit margin of 25.1% from fiscal years ending January 2017 to 2021. Looking back at the last five years, Walmart's gross profit margin peaked in January 2017 at 25.6%.
>In 2020, Target had a gross margin of 28.4 percent
>J.C. Penney may end up with $10.7 billion in net sales and 34.3% gross margins in 2019. (obviously this one is a bit dated, but I don't have time to compile an industry-wide profit & loss analysis, and it still gets the point across)
Profit margins on certain items may be what you're referring to, but that's a different conversation that brings in all manner of other facets (think like profit margins on game systems are extremely low because the sale of game systems is accompanied by a barrage of sales for more profitable items such as games & accessories)
And I'm well aware that profit margins and ROI aren't the same thing. Your profit margin is inextricably tied to your ROI, though, and while your example does a great job of showcasing the difference, it doesn't take reality into account; it's entirely arbitrary numbers. You're not making 7 figure profits from an 80k company, and so the disparity you're trying to show between an 8% margin and a 100% ROI, while technically possible, just isn't feasible, which brings us back to my point: no matter which way you spin it, if your profit margin is 8%, realistically the ROI just isn't up to par
Happy to help. You might be in luck though. If I thought the company was undervalued, I'd hang on. A quick glance at finbox wasn't promising but memes/momentum often trump value in the short term so it's a never a guarantee, more like a parachute. The technical set up is still there, the short term unconvincingly regained its footing by the end of the day. The medium term setup will hold until it breaks $13. Put/Call ratio was .38 Vol and even .62 OI but they make up less of the float compared tot he other plays here.
Finally you have The Senator Investment Group LLP filing for beneficial ownership of 6.03% after market close. Maybe that will all be enough to keep it in the game until you can get your lotto ticket back out.
https://finbox.com/NASDAQGS:MSFT/models/revenue-multiples
MSFT is currently trading 2x its bench mark revenue.
Since RKLB has no benchmark and no earnings, the easiest comparison is RKLBs current revenue multiple which investors treat as future earnings vs an established company's current earnings multiple.
If you want direct comparison. Then they are equivalent. Both are trading at about 20.
Since MSFT's revenue CAGR is 12%.
And RKLBs is about 230%.
These aren't even equivalent comparisons.
People like YOU are the embarrassments to real traders everywhere.
Enjoy your mediocre returns.
I used https://finbox.com/NASDAQGS:FB/models to come up with a fair value of $451.63. IIRC Sven Carlin evaluated at $410. With 15% margin of safety my entry would be $383.88. My current exit price is $541.95 (+20%), but I expect this price to increase over time.
The next 2 Q earnings will give us a better idea of whether or not they are able to sustain the kind of revenue growth and FCF growth they've put up YoY since 2016, but I don't think they will. However, they've expanded their balance sheet pretty significantly as well over the last few years, MGMT has also been aggressively buying back stock and retiring shares YoY.
But there has been weakness in their cash flows this year in particular compared to previous years, but IMO 2020 was sort of a standout year for INTC (and probably a lot of the rest of the market).
Just looking at P/E, P/B, and P/S multiples, you can justify a $70ish share price. Pulling up FinBox's 10yr DCF Revenue Exit model, they are projecting out about $74 share price, even accounting for this year's declines (and a -10% decline in YoY revenue growth in 2024).
In the short term, share price isn't reflective of underlying fundamentals, so maybe the above is all a moot point, but if you are purely looking at it from a fundamentals perspective, INTC is undervalued.
Tesco have been growing profit's for a few years! I don't think you can say they made huge profit because of covid! There are only so many shoppers buying a weekly shop.
BTW I'm not trying to defend tesco, I think the company is pretty shit overall!
Tesco gross profit 2017-02-25 4.3% 2018-02-24 4.7% 2019-02-23 6.2% 2020-02-29 6.6% 2021-02-27 5.5%
I’d be interested in your take on $WHR.
Overview: Consumer applicances, dank EPS, impressive YOY FCF growth, T H I C C d i v i d e n d s, and modestly off ATH. Need to double check their options volume/liquidity, but potentially interesting wheel candidate.
It’s trading at a P/E discount to its peers, and using a 13x fwd P/E multiple, fair value would $278, more than $50 above the current price. The 5Y DCF model on FinBox projects fair value at $369
How is 5M shares 5 months worth of trading volume? Aren't the figures listed in your link daily averages over a certain period of time?
Like a simple google search "AMZN daily volume" indicates this is the case and that the daily volume is about 3M shares a day:
https://finbox.com/NASDAQGS:AMZN/explorer/volume_avg_3m
Additionally, couldn't Bezos just spread these sales out over the year and thus barely be a blip on the radar for daily average volume?
I'm far from an expert here, so what am I missing?
sounds good, i'm also holding. i posted earlier in chat about looking to den, gtpl and hathway.
i got into den and gtpl.
den because its bv is 58 (due to recent ofs) 4.5x multiple currently. no debt. picked it up for a few quarters. waiting for it to go to 6x multiples.
gtpl is at 2.9x. guesstimate is 4x.
since both den and gtpl are predominantly isps my guesstimate is their multiples to be around 6x on the lower side. see below for their historical multiples.
I don't have the breakup. But it can be found out using all the 9 criteria if interested.
Also, you can have a look here for more details -- https://finbox.com/NYSE:HDB/explorer/piotroski_score
The hedge fund is full of vultures: https://finbox.com/blog/a-closer-look-at-ken-griffins-citadel-advisors/
Again, I know this is not a popular view, but the market maker is (purposefully) legally siloed from this. This is the major problem with combining the two in DD.
Look into good bank / bad bank structures from the 2008 financial crisis and S&L crisis in the 1970s. It's common for financial giants to concentrate the dirty activities in one sacrificial arm and silo the other to survive in the event of legal/regulatory pressure or collapse. Citadel has Securities to be the legit operation and it's a key one.
então o "agro é pop" porque é melhor que nada? o agro é esmola.
2019, exportação de café do Brasil: 5.01 bilhões de dólares, receita cambial
2019, Starbucks: 6.82 bilhões de dólares em lucro bruto, 110.2 bilhões em valor de mercado
​
​
sou o primeiro a admitir que não entendo muito de economia e posso ter pegados dados sem pé nem cabeça, se for o caso ajuda a tia que ela é de humanas.
“Definition of Float Shares / Outstanding Float Shares / Outstanding
The float is the number of shares actually available for trading. Shares outstanding are all the shares of a corporation or financial asset that have been authorized, issued and purchased by investors and are held by them. Float Shares / Outstanding measure the percentage of outstanding shares that are available for trading:”
REPEAT: “Float Shares / Outstanding measure the percentage of outstanding shares that are available for trading:”Now Shut Up and Sit Down
99.2% applies to shares available for trade not shares owned. I think a lot of the confusion is over the term "outstanding shares"
Float Shares / Outstanding The percentage of outstanding shares that are available for trading
Nope. Sorry but you don't know what tf you're talking about. Be less stupid.
Do some research instead of just parroting shit.
Float Shares / Outstanding:
The percentage of outstanding shares that are available for trading.
That's an interesting list.
Several of your choices have had a huge run, that's for sure. I know p/e can be inaccurate for companies early in the growth cycle, because corporate investment expenditures hurts accounting "earnings", but I normally would like to see lowish price per operating cash flow (different than price per free cash flow):
https://finbox.com/NASDAQGM:FLGT/explorer/price_to_ocf_ltm
I remember when AMZN was considered overpriced by many when its p/ocf was about 20 back in its huge-growth early days. Obviously those people didn't know what they were talking about. But a p/ocf of 200+ concerns me, like so many "growth" stocks today.
Even though FLGT has been growing its revenue so much lately, it is fairly high on its valuation.
But you've got some interesting values in your list. I want to take a longer look. Thanks for posting!
i tried the first couple of screeners mentioned on that link and found finbox.com to be the best one (so far)
- comprehensive, upfront metrics (although you need to refresh the page a couple of times)
- nice UI for me (minimal, colorful)
- searches through a wide range of markets (OTCPK, etc.)
my experiment was to see which screener i could reliably find a pennystock i currently hold through, and finbox was the first one i was able to do so
I've been using finbox.com and I think it's been really helpful. Not for doing your own DCF calculations, but they show their own calculations and models for most stocks out there, so it's a really nice and easy reference.
It does - Apple route huge amounts of profits to ROI as a low tax jurisdiction. They pay low corporation tax on those profits, but they are effectively 'trapped' there because as soon as they're transferred to a higher tax jurisdiction (say the parent company in the US) they will be subject to higher corporation tax. As such, Apple has significant retained profits in Ireland. There's not other reason for retaining them there than avoiding CT. Apple investors also (unsuccessfully ( sued the board because it chose to continue to retain profits rather than distribute them as dividends
https://finbox.com/NASDAQGS:AAPL/explorer/retained_earn
(AOI) Shareholder funds at the end of September last totalled $80.6 billion
Compare the AOI figure (even after the massive transfer of funds) that against Apple's total retained profits.
Respondendo, pois era minha dúvida meses atrás:
Tem uma nova parte fundamentalista no tradingview, mudaram recentemente, ficou show.
Assino também o simplywall.st, que achei mais barato e fácil de usar que o finbox.com.
Abs
Analysts have it from $8 to $11 for fair value: https://finbox.com/NYSE:APHA
I'm leaning towards the high side since there's hype plus they're in a growth period. It's probably more like $9. The election is driving the hype, plus the Sweetwater Brewing stuff.
> Why does this matter? If you include GF1, they are simultaneously building 4 factories around the world and aggressively developing and producing their own batteries.
Their capex seems to be rather problematic both in real and relative terms:
https://finbox.com/NASDAQGS:TSLA/explorer/capex
Their capex-to-sales isn't much different from Ford:
If you look at the individual companies in the Nasdaq, say Microsoft, it's currently trading at an expensive PE ratio of 35, but it's also been growing its earnings fairly consistently at an average rate of 13% (source). If the stock price of Microsoft somehow remains unchanged but growth remains consistent, then it'll hit a much more reasonable PE ratio of 18 after 5 years, which imo is a steal for a large stable company that also has strong growth prospects.
See Website Here: https://finbox.com/screener?ai=r9cnwu...
Keep the receipt just in case, also
These 3 tools made life better as a trader:
That is so true.
These 3 tools made life better as a trader:
This is the data product that I built through that course.. still in beta..
Goal is to make look like these combined
Buy the trend buddy. Also
Thank me later when you made the first mil
Save me a lot of headache from bad moves
Buy the trend buddy. Also
Thank me later when you made the first mil
Save me a lot of headache from bad moves
Buy the trend buddy. Also
Thank me later when you made the first mil
Save me a lot of headache from bad moves
Buy the trend buddy. Also
Thank me later when you made the first mil
Save me a lot of headache from bad moves
Buy the trend buddy. Also
Thank me later when you made the first mil
Save me a lot of headache from bad moves
Buy the trend buddy. Also
Thank me later when you made the first mil
Save me a lot of headache from bad moves
Buy the trend buddy. Also
Thank me later when you made the first mil
Save me a lot of headache from bad moves
Buy the trend buddy. Also
Thank me later when you made the first mil
Save me a lot of headache from bad moves
Buy the trend buddy. Also
Thank me later when you made the first mil
Save me a lot of headache from bad moves
Buy the trend buddy. Also
Thank me later when you made the first mil
Save me a lot of headache from bad moves
Buy the trend buddy. Also
Thank me later when you made the first mil
Save me a lot of headache from bad moves
Buy the trend buddy. Also
Thank me later when you made the first mil
Save me a lot of headache from bad moves
Buy the trend buddy. Also
Thank me later when you made the first mil
Save me a lot of headache from bad moves
Buy the trend buddy. Also
Thank me later when you made the first mil
Save me a lot of headache from bad moves
Buy the trend buddy. Also
Thank me later when you made the first mil
Save me a lot of headache from bad moves
Buy the trend buddy. Also
Thank me later when you made the first mil
Save me a lot of headache from bad moves
Buy the trend buddy. Also
Thank me later when you made the first mil
Save me a lot of headache from bad moves
There are plenty of politics in the logistics industry.
Buy the trend buddy. Also
Thank me later when you made the first mil
Save me a lot of headache from bad moves
Buy the trend buddy. Also
Thank me later when you made the first mil
Save me a lot of headache from bad moves
Buy the trend buddy. Also
Thank me later when you made the first mil
Save me a lot of headache from bad moves
Buy the trend buddy. Also
Thank me later when you made the first mil
Save me a lot of headache from bad moves
Buy the trend buddy. Also
Thank me later when you made the first mil
Save me a lot of headache from bad moves
Buy the trend buddy. Also
Thank me later when you made the first mil
Save me a lot of headache from bad moves
Buy the trend buddy. Also
Thank me later when you made the first mil
Save me a lot of headache from bad moves
Buy the trend buddy. Also
Thank me later when you made the first mil
Save me a lot of headache from bad moves
Buy the trend buddy. Also
Thank me later when you made the first mil
Save me a lot of headache from bad moves
Buy the trend buddy. Also
Thank me later when you made the first mil
Save me a lot of headache from bad moves
Buy the trend buddy. Also
Thank me later when you made the first mil
Save me a lot of headache from bad moves
Buy the trend buddy. Also
Thank me later when you made the first mil
Save me a lot of headache from bad moves