Could it be because Trump has been in and out of Russia since the 1980's?
I'm starting to think Trump was cultivated as an informant on other American billionaires in the 1980's when the USSR was still around.
Trump has been wanting to build in Moscow since 1987.
https://www.sutori.com/story/trumputin
>January 1987 -/- Trump is invited to Russia after being seated next to Ambassador Yuri Dubinin at a social event. Dubinin was part of group of Russian officials meeting American business leaders. This group included future UN ambassador Vitaly Churkin. A few months later Trump and Ivana were flown to Russia by the Soviet agency for international tourism, Intourist. He talks of building a hotel next to the Kremlin.
This is pathological behavior. Trump deflects when he is caught doing something wrong.
Trump is a man who wanted to build a hotel next to the Kremlin while the USSR was still around, and he has been in and out of Russia for most of his adult life. This deflection game is him muddying the waters while the sharks circle. The feds and half of the world's intel agencies are coming for Donnie boy.
Let's start at the beginning:
>1987: Trump visits Moscow and Leningrad, his first trip to what was then the USSR, to explore expanding his hotel empire to those cities. Donald Trump meets with then-U.S.S.R. communist government officials in Moscow to discuss a joint partnership deal to build a hotel in the city.
Trump is no mere opportunist either, Trump first visited Moscow in 1987 and first started railing against NATO in 1988.
https://www.sutori.com/story/trumputin
Start here: > Trump visits Moscow and Leningrad, his first trip to what was then the USSR, to explore expanding his hotel empire to those cities. Donald Trump meets with then-U.S.S.R. communist government officials in Moscow to discuss a joint partnership deal to build a hotel in the city.
This could be 100% false I don't know anything about him, but on sutori.com It states he could have manic depression or bipolar disorder https://www.sutori.com/story/hayao-miyazaki--e5ab2ptVHBrQLg9Kt3SzkDRz Also this is a quick google search so i could 100% be wrong
I didn't forget:
WWI was a very big cause of WWII. WWI led to depressions in Germany, Italy, the Soviet Union, and many more places which in turn caused powerful people to rise in many different countries. These countries in which a person of power rose each had some part in the start of WWII. Another thing that led to WWII was appeasement. The League of Nations was supposed to stand up to countries that acted out, but they did not. When the League of Nations was called upon to stop a country from acting out, too often they stood by and did nothing. The League of Nations didn't do anything to stop these countries because they were afraid that if they interfered it would cause another World War. What they didn't know was that if they did not stand up to this, it would cause a World War anyway.
https://www.sutori.com/story/how-the-conclusion-of-wwi-led-to-wwii
The people that made these decisions were the leaders of WW1 similar to how the OT heroes became the leaders of the Rebellion.
When a soldier's heroic sacrifice is betrayed by the incompetence of their leadership it is not a show of respect to the dead soldier to ignore the leader's incompetence.
I'm sure you are just being hyperbolic,
But
World wars have no impact on global population.
Even WWIII and serious pandemic according to some studies
Short of all out nuclear annihilation, war is not going to make the slightest difference it would seem.
WWII killed 'just' 3% of global population for example. Including civilians.
> Those are absolutely not normal circumstances.
This exact line has been the fall of nearly every fallen republic/democracy. There is never 'normal' circumstances in politics. "Emergency powers" due to "abnormal circumstances" are always the beginning of the end.
"Informed observer," my ass. Net neutrality has been enforced since 2010. To suggest that it was a new rule in 2015 is deliberately misleading. Net neutrality had to be reimplemented in 2015 because an appeals court ruled that the FCC had misclassified the internet. The FCC merely reclassified the internet, and the rule was not substantially changed. Net neutrality stood for 7 years with just that one bureaucratic hiccup. We are not returning to a 2014 state of regulation. We are returning to a state of regulation more closely resembling 2009. Cruz says net neutrality supporters are "believing online propaganda" in the same breath that he himself spreads dishonest and juvenile propaganda.
His argument that the net neutrality should be repealed because the internet was healthy in ~~2014~~ 2009 is nonsense—firstly because the internet wasn't perfectly healthy in that era (e.g. Comcast had been blocking perfectly lawful file-sharing traffic) and that's why net neutrality was implemented in the first place, and secondly because internet usage is substantially different now than it was then.
What good does repealing net neutrality do for the public? This is the question that matters. It has most often gotten me the answer, "more investment in infrastructure," which is vague and not well supported. ISPs, the FCC, and the GOP are not presenting serious arguments to justify their immensely unpopular move. Why not?
Trump could've been compromised as early as 1987.
>January 1987: Trump is invited to Russia after being seated next to Ambassador Yuri Dubinin at a social event. Dubinin was part of group of Russian officials meeting American business leaders. This group included future UN ambassador Vitaly Churkin. A few months later Trump and Ivana were flown to Russia by the Soviet agency for international tourism, Intourist. He talks of building a hotel next to the Kremlin.
You can go back to 1987 for Trump's first contact with Russia.
>January 1987 -- Trump is invited to Russia after being seated next to Ambassador Yuri Dubinin at a social event. Dubinin was part of group of Russian officials meeting American business leaders. This group included future UN ambassador Vitaly Churkin. A few months later Trump and Ivana were flown to Russia by the Soviet agency for international tourism, Intourist. He talks of building a hotel next to the Kremlin.
There was no accusation of hacking votes.
I guess you didn't read the declassified documents from the FBI, CIA, and NSA about how Russia influenced the election.
Why do you think you would have seen enough public evidence of an ongoing investigation to make any judgement? This thread is about people wanting a deeper investigation because of the current public knowledge and conflicts of interest that exist.
https://www.sutori.com/story/trumputin
Go through that link and tell me there isn't enough public information to at least warrant an investigation.
This story will continue to persist with the IC sharing even more info with congress that we don't even know that has them wanting more of an investigation. Even as a trump supporter, one would want this investigated properly to make sure no one in the WH has been compromised in any way.
The irony in this whole thing is that the Russia issue may be the largest conspiracy since Watergate (at least) and the "hardcore conspiracy theorists" have been spending their time on pizza shops and now anonymously sourced articles about wire taps. This should be the Golden Era of /r/conspiracy and it's not.
Want a rabbit hole? Trump-Putin timeline
“I know a little something about soft money, as my family is the largest single contributor of soft money to the national Republican Party. Occasionally a wayward reporter will try to make the charge that we are giving this money to get something in return, or that we must be purchasing influence in some way,” she wrote in an essay for the Capitol Hill newspaper Roll Call. After explaining that she did not always get everything that she demanded, DeVos continued, “I have decided, however, to stop taking offense at the suggestion that we are buying influence. Now I simply concede the point. They are right. We do expect some things in return.”
- Betsy DeVos
https://progressive.org/magazine/betsy-devos-the-investor-who-got-a-high-return/
Last time I checked, one side doesn't need theocratic law promises, voter suppression and gerrymandering to win but the GOP does. Any rational person can look at Sessions' history and know he is a crooked piece of shit, not to mention everyone around Trump is dropping like flies for their ties to Russia so you must not be a very rational person. Read this and learn something.
https://www.sutori.com/story/trumputin
>-- Jan 1987 --
>Trump is invited to Russia after being seated next to Ambassador Yuri Dubinin at a social event. Dubinin was part of group of Russian officials meeting American business leaders. This group included future UN ambassador Vitaly Churkin. A few months later Trump and Ivana were flown to Russia by the Soviet agency for international tourism, Intourist. He talks of building a hotel next to the Kremlin.
Timeline of Trump and Russia from the beginning.
>Trump is invited to Russia after being seated next to Ambassador Yuri Dubinin at a social event. Dubinin was part of group of Russian officials meeting American business leaders. This group included future UN ambassador Vitaly Churkin. A few months later Trump and Ivana were flown to Russia by the Soviet agency for international tourism, Intourist. He talks of building a hotel next to the Kremlin.
NN has always been a “thing” (it has been protected by the FCC), and the only reason that more legislation had to be made in 2015 was because ISPs were censoring information.
Banning
>men's ponytails
When it's
>A traditional Han Chinese hairstyle- It was inspired by the Confucian belief that cutting your hair was a symbol of dishonour.
https://www.sutori.com/story/men-s-hairstyles-throughout-the-dynasties--HAeVx4vPpi8EfRsgiNctM9Kw
People's Republic of China getting less Chinese...
If you want a source here ya go as well: https://www.sutori.com/story/events-leading-up-to-the-crusades
The Seljuk Turks contolled the Jerusalem and advanced within 100 miles of Constantinople, the capital of the Byzantine Empire.
The growing power of the Seljuks was a threat to the Byzantine Empire. Christians in Europe also feared that they would not be able to safely travel to Jerusalem to visit sacred places in the Holy Land.
1095 - the Byzantine Emperor asks Pope Urban II for help. The Pope gives a famous speech at the Council of Clermont. He calls for a Christian crusade to stop the Muslims and take back Jerusalem.
Trump's return-on-investment is terrible. He's essentially a kid who was born with a silver spoon in his mouth and spent a few decades flopping about the Manhattan property market until he finally ran out of money in the 90's and was bailed out by shady post-soviet investors.
Trump is worth an alleged 4bn today (nobody really knows since he won't release his tax returns). He would have been worth 14bn if he had not played with daddy's money, as the S&P grew over 1400%. Trump's ROI is 300% over 30 years. For the same period, actually talented businessmen such as Bill Gates and Warren Buffet did 7000% and 2600%.
http://fortune.com/2015/08/20/donald-trump-index-funds/
Trump-Russia timeline (what we know so far):
https://www.sutori.com/story/trumputin
Connections between Trump and dirty money in real estate:
https://www.ft.com/content/33285dfa-9231-11e6-8df8-d3778b55a923
Which is bullshit.
>The go to argument over there seems to be "democrats don't understand that before 2015 there were no net neutrality laws and everything was fine before then."
And taken from another Reddit comment I can't find right now:
>..."Informed observer," my ass. Net neutrality has been enforced since 2010. To suggest that it was a new rule in 2015 is deliberately misleading. Net neutrality had to be reimplemented in 2015 because an appeals court ruled that the FCC had misclassified the internet. The FCC merely reclassified the internet, and the rule was not substantially changed. Net neutrality stood for 7 years with just that one bureaucratic hiccup. We are not returning to a 2014 state of regulation. We are returning to a state of regulation more closely resembling 2009. Cruz says net neutrality supporters are "believing online propaganda" in the same breath that he himself spreads dishonest and juvenile propaganda.
>His argument that the net neutrality should be repealed because the internet was healthy in ~~2014~~ 2009 is nonsense—firstly because the internet wasn't perfectly healthy in that era (e.g. Comcast had been blocking perfectly lawful file-sharing traffic) and that's why net neutrality was implemented in the first place, and secondly because internet usage is substantially different now than it was then.
>What good does repealing net neutrality do for the public? This is the question that matters. It has most often gotten me the answer, "more investment in infrastructure," which is vague and not well supported. ISPs, the FCC, and the GOP are not presenting serious arguments to justify their immensely unpopular move. Why not?
WW1 and WW2 are actually more related than you may think.
The manner in which WW1 was ended with massive sanctions and legal restrictions for Germany and others set the stage for outrage of the citizens and fascist dictators to rise.
Literally searching "how ww1 started ww2" leads to a number of sites which corroborate each other.
https://www.sutori.com/story/how-the-conclusion-of-wwi-led-to-wwii https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causes_of_World_War_II
https://www.glaad.org/reference/transgender
https://www.sutori.com/story/most-people-don-t-want-to-believe-trap-is-a-pejorative-term
It basically comes from people thinking that trans people want to "trap" them into having sex with them.
Here's another picture that shows more detail of the same street, with that one building in the distance. That raised part to the left looks very unfamiliar but should narrow down your search. Don't give up, because while the buildings have most likely all changed, the street grid is mostly the same.
EDIT: This could be the same landscape feature, if you look at the Sept 22 image.
My pleasure, please watch this treasonous motherfucker squirm for 30 full minutes. When asked about Russian connections, he says that "major crimes have been committed" -- he's talking about the fact that there were leaks, while ignoring their substance. Another highlight is how quickly he dodges the tax question.
See, I love me some union involvement.
https://www.sutori.com/story/labor-strikes-early-1900s--nXHEzXygCE9xn9eCUUUUk4ao read about union strikes.
"Minimum Wage | Wex | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute" https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/minimum_wage
This covers the Fair Labor Standards Act, which explains all the things.
"Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938: Maximum Struggle for a Minimum Wage | U.S. Department of Labor" https://www.dol.gov/general/aboutdol/history/flsa1938
Here's more on the FLSA and the really f'ed up things employers did before the government set up regulations.
Revolution is on the working man's back, my guy. It always has been. Don't be a scab.
https://www.sutori.com/story/a-history-of-immigration-in-the-usa
Criminals in America?
"From 1717 to the end of the American Revolution in 1783, the British transported over 50,000 prison convicts to the American colonies as part of the Transportation Act. This accounted for about 9% of immigrants during this period. Once the United States was born, Great Britain exported its convicts to Australia instead, a practice that continued until 1868."
Ya'all missed something: legals can be criminals too.
The call to be respectful is to allow uninterrupted footage of him speaking authoritatively to influential people. Stand by, and there's a clip that people (idiots) see as him being right and respected.
Trump's long history with Russia, and entwined players he's surrounded himself with.
Well, it's truly an ancient tactic... more cases than you could possibly count. Machiavelli wrote about it, and the founders of the USA did a LOT of debating about it, and how to deal with having constitutional rights during emergencies, mostly with Rome as their historical reference.
Marx argued that communist revolutions were all basically to be justified as "emergency powers" to establish dictatorship "of the proletariat" (of course, this always just establishes a normal dictator).
Found this with a quick search, lists a lot of examples starting with Rome becoming a dictatorship, all the way up through Lincoln in the USA, and more.
History is chock full of "emergency dictators" and "emergency powers" and "emergency laws" that are sold as being temporary, but last for decades, centuries, or forever (like the US Income Tax, for example).
No one’s wishing death on anyone. The tweet only points out the irony of an adulterer condoning the Holy Bible. Regardless, due process will punish Trump. Here’s some evidence if you’d like to check it out: https://www.sutori.com/story/timeline-you-might-be-interested-in--pTTyLH39r7FsRtF51JZi4BVt
Good for you for noticing this. Of course the Moon itself isn't changing, but your position on Earth relative to the Moon is. Suppose you are in a room with a north wall, a south wall, an east wall, and a west wall, and also suppose you have an Earth globe. Suspend the globe several feet above the floor with string so the globe rotates on its side, with the North Pole of the globe pointing to the north wall and the South Pole of the globe pointing to the south wall. Imagine the letter C is painted on the ceiling directly above the globe, with the opening side of the C facing the west wall. That's the crescent Moon. OK so far?
Let's pretend you are standing on Earth's equator. Lie beneath the globe with your head toward the west wall and your feet toward the center of the globe (toward the east wall). Look at the C, and you should see an upward-facing U, like this photo taken at the equator:
r/https://www.sutori.com/item/untitled-9d8e-6567
Twelve hours later, Earth's rotation will have carried you to the other side of the globe, so now lie beneath the globe with your head toward the east wall and your feet toward the center of the globe (toward the west wall). Look at the C, and you will see a downward-facing U. How about half-way between the two? Imagine standing at the equator and looking up. You will see the letter C, but whether you see it forward or backward depends on whether you are facing south or north.
Here is a decent history of Net Neutrality!
Most imagine some broad tyrannical sweeping moves from the ISPs when it comes to violating NN, but the truth is that they're far more subtle than that.
They're slowly warming the water so no one notices when it's boiling.
Thanks!
It seems there used to be a Ford plant there at one point also:
http://www.atdetroit.net/forum/messages/6790/57392.html?1129598706
http://swoda.uwindsor.ca/node/820 shows a huge plant complex going inland from that area, and I guess a crane at the river for loading ships.
What do you mean there want throttling before it was a thing? There was. There was also more shady shit than just throttling. I’m on mobile so can’t cite things quickly but just a simple google search shows this: https://www.sutori.com/story/the-history-of-net-neutrality-in-the-u-s And when I get home I am going to try to find the reddit post that cited several occasions back in early 2000’s where internet providers were taking advantage of consumers which was why ultimately it became classified as a telecommunications asset so it could be regulated. Update to come.
Was thinking more where there are larger reservations. Looks like the Dakotas should also be a bit higher. Really surprised there aren’t reservations in Alaska! https://www.sutori.com/en/item/an-indian-reservation-is-a-legal-designation-for-an-area-of-land-managed-by-a-fe
There could be another explanation I’m not aware of like in MN and Dakota’s they don’t report missing native Americans.
As far as I know, it's shaped that way because many years of selective breeding has caused their features to change in an odd way, in a similar way to how a pug's nose now tends to be heavily sunken inwards. If you look at the illustrations on this website, the bull terrier's head apparently used to look much more normal.
Yea my b. Should have sourced it in my original post. The above links are articles I've read that backed up what I originally found. I initially learned about both of the stories from this timeline though.
https://www.sutori.com/story/the-history-of-net-neutrality-in-the-u-s
If you want a ton of people to see the Trump Russia connection, just make a post sharing these links
https://www.sutori.com/story/trumputin
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/3259984-Trump-Intelligence-Allegations.html
https://www.sutori.com/story/trumputin
Mountain of circumstantial evidence at the very least. Glacier of reasons for suspicion. Plus, no tax returns, no idea what an international business magnate connected to former mobsters has in the works, who he might owe, who might be paying him.
What is there to get to the bottom to? There's so much shady shit in the public domain it's hard to keep track. That we still don't have an independent investigation with a special prosecutor is proof the GOP is complicit. Nothing is going to happen until 2018, if dems retake the House.
There's a model about revolution created by an American historian of France that contained four stages, but they were mostly concerned with revolution as opposed to general political cycles.
His name was Crane Brinton -- he thought the cycle included old regime, moderate rule, crisis, and recovery.
I don’t know how you expect me to prove the experiences of trans women in a comment section but here:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/intoomanywords.com/2017/12/05/why-trap-is-a-bad-term/amp/
Again, just because it’s a term used in fictional settings doesn’t mean it doesn’t have any impact on the real world. People watch anime, having never met or interacted with the trans community, and use these characters as their basis for judging real trans people. Even if they’re “just in anime” these characters are transphobic because they create this perception that people who don’t adhere to the gender binary as deceptive and untruthful and can have very real effects in the the real world.
Yeah it really is. Like I said, she was speaking generally and yes, the reality is more complex and nuanced. But most of us are smart enough to understand what she meant, that some facets of the British accents brought to the U.S. have been preserved in America.
https://www.bbc.com/culture/article/20180207-how-americans-preserved-british-english
https://owlcation.com/humanities/brits-had-american-accents
https://www.sutori.com/en/story/evolution-of-the-american-accent--XoPCxnaD6D3ZhtiWWuz3gnvP
EU drafts plan to label gas and nuclear investments as green
See also: Ketchup is a Vegetable
The following is a copy of the original post to record the post as it was originally written.
We've broken hundreds of treaties promising independent land and governance over the years to our Native tribes, usually shrinking or eliminating the land promised to them. I've heard several solutions to this:
decolonization - all non-natives move out of the promised lands (or the whole continent) and it goes back to natives
Land Back - land promised is given back to native tribes, without necessarily having everyone move out. States that are entirely treaty land cease to exist
federation - like what Russia used to have (before they started breaching it recently), where they are all basically states given the name of their tribe. In This case, we'd have and additional 1148 senators and at least 574 representatives changed or added in congress
repayment - settle the damages monetarily and call it a day. Though tribes seem to be not so keen on that
Map of Indian land (their words) according to the courts interpretation of treaties can be found here.
A more contiguous drawing of historical land claims can be found here,
There's presently 574 federally recognized tribes
This kind of thing seems to be a more focused on issue for liberals, so I wondered what their school of thought said on the issue
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/AskALiberal) if you have any questions or concerns.
Website where the photo was found: https://www.sutori.com/story/algerian-war--Jnkj342jvd3K1C7vMrjwG3xJ
Its caption is Tableoux Vivant which translates to Living Image i believe.
"And in the months that would follow, as politicians and other narcissists who masquerade as sources of wisdom like Joe Rogan make masks a matter of masculinity and politics, and lockdowns meant to save lives are turned into attempted autocracy - incalculable lives are preventably lost due to a handful of people who only surround themselves with sycophants and fluffers, who seize the chance to try and direct the public discourse while having almost no idea at all what they're actually doing while their unmasked constituents waddle calm as Buddhist cows through Big Box stores."
This preprint has a bunch of DRASTIC authors on it:
"Three peer-reviewed papers later, including the first to argue for the plausibility of a laboratory origin, maybe we've been on to something?"
https://www.sutori.com/story/d-r-a-s-t-i-c-2020-origins--xCvdWonoJTx4TYVtAC4EhQ1b
> I stated which rule was broken previously. The rule which a club must not have any outstanding tax debts upon application for said licence.
That’s not a rule. That’s an imprecise statement of a principle behind one set of the licensing requirements. All clubs will have tax liabilities (VAT etc.) as a creditor during the application prices. That’s not an issue.
The UEFA regulations are concerned about overdue payables. There are definitions about what a payable is and when it becomes overdue. If you’re going to claim rules were broken you should reference those.
> Evidence from the wee tax case showed that HMRC first made contact with rangers around a debt around November 2010. With a demand for payment made by HMRC in February 2011
I think the demands for payment were made in May. Regardless, even if it was February then the UEFA regulations for issuing a license in March 2011 required no overdue payables as at 31st December 2010.
Article 50 – No overdue payables towards employees and social/tax authorities 1 The licence applicant must prove that as at 31 March preceding the licence season it has no overdue payables (as defined in Annex VIII) towards its employees or social and tax authorities as a result of contractual and legal obligations towards its employees that arose prior to the previous 31 December.
They were real. This is an interesting short history:
https://www.sutori.com/story/the-evolution-of-the-pot-belly-stove--LC3qRkGPkYc6F9gUNQ2HQV8o
https://www.sutori.com/story/wilbur-arg-timeline--Vpcbg1tL2T6R6pZBnMS41319 not the sever (im im in it but the button to get a link was not there). This is like a timeline of what happened and how everyone solved stuff.
I have seen other maps putting the taiga further north, this one for instance, which is more correct. Although they put it all the way to the coast there. But on such a small map you can't expect the details to be correct I guess.
According to the website below the first stereo headphones using bluetooth technology were invented in 2004.
https://www.sutori.com/story/the-history-of-bluetooth-headphones--N6tTxcaHeCN9YuGsFXqs52jh
I'm gonna go with Year 2615 of our Lord Psamtik II (may he rule in the fields of Aaru for all eternity!).
In all seriousness though, it seems that they got the date 6262 from here (actually here but my link explains why).
> Censorinus's placement of an apocatastasis on 21 July ad 139 permitted the calculation of its predecessors to 1322, 2782, and 4242 bc. The last is sometimes described as "the first exactly dated year in history" but, since the calendar is attested before Dynasty XVIII and the last date is now known to far predate early Egyptian civilization, it is typically credited to Dynasty II around the middle date.
But yeah, it would make no sense to use it seeing as it predates Narmer by 1000 years.
>The mods themselves allowed all the threads i mentioned speaking of traps. No comment on the replies OR from mods said it was a slur.
Well, not in the evidence you provided. Just some low posts using the word and some comments. If you bring posts with not 1 comment complaining about the word? Sure, but this "evidence" is just some cherries you picked.
>So it's not a slur because some perpetually-angry people suddenly say it is, when even on trans subs it was used innocuously.
Thanks for ignoring my words. That was not what that part was at all. Are you gonna keep parroting about "just some people complaining" until it becomes true? While ignoring everything that disproves it?
>Can you prove it was aimed at trans women for years?
Sure.
Make sure to read the whole article.
Here's a timeline explaining what's happened so far, and what is scheduled to happen later.
If I understand correctly, Eric Bunch's resolution would establish local control of KCPD as an "ongoing legislative priority" without needing the public to vote on it.
>over double the number you cited for incel murder
46 deaths vs 752,639+. HMMM GREAT ARGUMENT YOU GOT THERE. Also, it depends on who you consider "incels". Very few have been motivated solely by inceldom.
>I'm sure six minutes of research on the other two topics would provide a similar result of made-up statistics.
I got some bad news for you, partner. Source 1 and source 2 (at least 800,000 according to this link).
Upvoted you for randia quote 🙂
The premise itself is poles apart.
America - 1. From Columbus's arrival to America in 1492 up until today, Native American tribes have been oppressed and cast down. In the 1800's, their land was invaded and they were forced onto reservations. In the Indian Wars, many Native Americans were labeled "hostile" and massacred by the Union Army.
Bharat:
Based on Vedic dharma principles with rich culture.
Ravaged by muslims for 800 years Colonized by British/French/British (Christians) for almost 300 years
Such association / comparison is meaningless.
Jai Bharat Mata 🙏
That's quick, thank you so much! The embed looks lovely, see here. We just played the first round of this new game, some very intriguing moves.
What is physical truth? For a long while it was physical truth that the Earth was the center of the universe. It was physical truth that the Earth was flat. It was physical truth that your humors needed to be in balance for you to be healthy. The physical truth isn't always right, nor is it necessarily right to believe that truth is a physical thing that one can measurably see.
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/truth-correspondence/
By switch, do they mean genders?
"Using the n-word is fine because it is a thing that people do and since they're being less than chivalrous they should expect retaliation"
That can be used to justify the use of any word, "S*c, h*ky, etc." Just because "words are made up and can be used to joke" doesn't mean that their connotation or their history doesn't affect the people they're used on.
If you believe they'll discuss in good faith, go for it, otherwise that's up to you.
If you look at the map below, I am not sure it would have changed anything other than not allowing Jackson to step on to the US stage, and use that success to become president. With the treaty already signed, basically it just reinforced the idea that Britain had lost the US lands forever and we never getting them back. https://www.sutori.com/item/treaty-of-ghent-1814-armistice-ceasefire-no-more-fighting-no-real-winner
> So you think that a metal engine hitting the ground at 500+ mph could bounce, remain somewhat intact, then bury itself into the ground 300 yards away?
Yes. And it wasn’t that big of a piece. This it’s what a crash site looks like when an airliner is shot down. And This is what flight 93 looked like.
Note how the first one has much larger debris. That’s consistent with the plane breaking apart at altitude due to a missile hit, and the pieces falling to earth at terminal velocity.
Note how the second one, Flight 93, has extremely small debris, consistent with an intact airplane moving at very high speed before impact.
Your assessment of the physics involved is way off. Looking at it, there is absolutely no way flight 93 was shot down. It flew into the ground.
So you think businesses should be allowed to discriminate as they did decades ago? https://www.sutori.com/item/lunch-counter-sit-ins-1960-the-greensboro-sit-ins-were-a-series-of-nonviolent
After i thought about it I would not put it under performence.
Lets say the PC can sing. No questions asked, the PC is simply good in it. Than I would not do a performance check but maybe something else that would fit in this situation.
E.g. the PC wants to sing a Song in a tavern. I would let him roll under perception and insight. Perception to spot all the petrions and insight to know what Song would best fit. If he faiös bis perception Check than the PC is to "nervous" and forget to look in the crowd... I hope you get my drive.
@op i'm sorry. I do not know any songs you could sing. But on my quick google search I habe found this https://www.sutori.com/story/english-medieval-ballads--ZJAUPhXeSA6ZPQoPRNKvtRRP
I hope this helps
Trumps history through 2018... Trying to ascertain why it isn’t up to date, but it’s a real eye opener.
>“I know a little something about soft money, as my family is the largest single contributor of soft money to the national Republican Party. Occasionally a wayward reporter will try to make the charge that we are giving this money to get something in return, or that we must be purchasing influence in some way…I have decided, however, to stop taking offense at the suggestion that we are buying influence. Now I simply concede the point. They are right. We do expect some things in return.”
Betsy DeVos, <em>The Hill</em>, 1997
This was a pre-Citizens United quote. They've gotten far more blatant since then.
It’s always crazy when big things like this happen where you live. We’ve had a few big cases here, Maddie Clifton and Somer Thompson to name a couple.
I was 15 when Maddie disappeared. Her killer was 14 and I had a couple of friends who kind of knew the guy. That one was hard. I had recently had my daughter when Somer disappeared, which made that hit home in a big way.
I'm continuing work on my side-project, Backtest. It's still a small app so I can easily try out and adopt Ember Octane features. My favorite features are definitely element modifiers and tagless components!
Also slowly adopting Ember Octane features for my main app, Sutori. It's a slower process cause it's a bigger and more mature app. For every component that I touch, I:
I definitely thank Ember.js that a single developer can develop and maintain an app with over 600k visits per month and 50k active users.
> Do people honestly believe these individuals handing over millions of dollars to political figures aren't expecting some kind of return? They're investments.
Betsy DeVos said so 20+ years ago.
>1997: Betsy DeVos writes an op-ed for the Capitol Hill newspaper Roll Call, admitting that "I know a little something about soft money, as my family is the largest single contributor of soft money to the national Republican Party. Occasionally a wayward reporter will try to make the charge that we are giving this money to get something in return, or that we must be purchasing influence in some way. … I have decided, however, to stop taking offense at the suggestion that we are buying influence. Now I simply concede the point. They are right. We do expect some things in return."
LOL. I'll let Betsy Devos, the Secretary of Education explain it to you:
“I know a little something about soft money, as my family is the largest single contributor of soft money to the national Republican Party. Occasionally a wayward reporter will try to make the charge that we are giving this money to get something in return, or that we must be purchasing influence in some way,” she wrote in an essay for the Capitol Hill newspaper Roll Call. After explaining that she did not always get everything that she demanded, DeVos continued, “I have decided, however, to stop taking offense at the suggestion that we are buying influence. Now I simply concede the point. They are right. We do expect some things in return.”
At least she's more honest than Danny boy.
The population of Easter Island decreased because of the number of takers, according to this article.
"Easter Island suffered an ecological collapse or ecocide, partially from natural causes but mainly from human overconsumption of the island's resources. This ecocide caused a famine and led the island's government structure to collapse, creating the small, loosely organized island population of today."
It is not impossible, you're right. It's just insanely difficult and infuriating when you're the one on the receiving end of the violence, murder, oppression, disruption and disenfranchisement, then you're asked to come peaceably to the table, to "do the work". Black people didn't start this shit, it's not their responsibility to dismantle white supremacy, do you understand that? The work has to be done by the people in power, in this case white people, to make up the difference, to make the country whole, just. Have some made it, of course they have, but that's despite ludicrously overwhelming odds, and having to be twice as perfect as any white person. Look at where we are politically-do you think if Obama had any of the shit going on in just his personal life that Trump does, he'd have been president? Look at this and remember, the people pouring milk and sugar, spitting on and denigrating the folks at this diner grew up to become your Congressmen, your Senators in the GOP. I'll leave us with this:
"If you stick a knife in my back nine inches and pull it out six inches, there's no progress. If you pull it all the way out that's not progress. Progress is healing the wound that the blow made. And they haven't even pulled the knife out much less heal the wound. They won't even admit the knife is there." - Malcolm X
Canada is larger than Europe, mate. Driving coast to coast in Canada is the equivalent of driving from the extreme end of Ireland to the northern border of Iran.
> The point was how far removed Canada is from the US
I mean, Canada is also the number one source of tourists to the US at around 19.29 million a year. While China has eclipsed Canada in recent years, Canada is still second largest trading partner at $582.4 billion a year.
On a per-state basis, is the number one export destination for a majority of US states. It seems weird for you to downplay it. Seems like you're trying to excuse your own ignorance.
Fact is, Americans don't know anything about most countries. Size and location has nothing to do with it. Their news is US centric. Their entertainment tends to be US centric. And their school systems tend to focus on state history, rather than national or international matters. It seems silly to me for any country to be so clueless about any of their neighbours, regardless of their size.
>it's possible they've got him on tape with teenage girls too, but I think what he's actually scared of are the money crimes.
If this timeline is even 10% accurate, he should be terrified.
https://www.sutori.com/story/timeline-you-might-be-interested-in--pTTyLH39r7FsRtF51JZi4BVt
Sure, the fact that there literally were no more than a few thousand Americans in California in the 1940s. 99% of the population was Native or in Spanish Missions.
In 1850, the California Census was 92,597 people. Between 1848 and 1854, 300,000 people moved to California.
Or more extreme, the population of San Francisco:
https://www.sutori.com/item/the-population-grows-a-lot-during-gold-rush
So sure, no scientist documented any Monarch butterflies before 1850s - because there literally was nobody to document it. No Native American or Spanish scientists even, nobody. This is a pants on fire lie.
No, simply because this wasn’t an issue 10 years ago. Look at who is against it, AT&T, Comcast, Time Warner Cable (TWC), Verizon etc. you crust the cord way back when, now that amount of people who have since then have exploded, myself being one of them. There’s more too:
https://www.sutori.com/story/the-history-of-net-neutrality-in-the-u-s
Cool, i like a good copy paste, you gonna read this one? https://www.sutori.com/story/trump-russia I couldn't paste it all because it's too long, there's a lot of information you're gonna want to get into.
Let me know what you think since you do understand he was being investigated since he was working with Russia, but you don't seem to grasp why we would be investigating him, well it was because he was working with Russia.
But good on you for seeing the lizard people, hope your select sources keep you warm at night with those warm lies that keep you feeling safe.
My reading is that it was to wound Clinton and as the vid pointed out to just continue questioning her illegitimacy globally and locally. He lucked out with backing Trump and now everyone is sorting out how to deal with the blowback. That Trump is still stuck to Putin's hip with today's tweet makes you wonder about his motivations.
You want evidence, here's a timeline on Trump with tons of sources. You want a smoking gun before a public investigation and you won't even take the time to look into the evidence yourself? Putin has arrested at least 3 on treason, poisoned a dude for the 2nd time and has some untimely deaths piling up.
That's not skepticism, that's being lazy.