This reminds me of the time Apple removed their time remaining estimates on the Mac. Next thing they'll be asking for is to hide your battery status cos that totally isn't important.
How about an AI that compares signal strength over time to other carriers and other Android devices and produces a graph that shows which is the worst (spoiler: cumcast).
But no, that'd be too consumer friendly, like how Cumcast helped delete the worldwide net index that showed which ISPs are the best/worst.
Can't be revealing too much now. Consumers might complain, can't be having that.
You’ll be pleasantly surprised by AT&T fiber. We have had it for about 1.5 years after moving to the area. We had Comcast prior to that. Night and day difference.
Edit: Seeing as this has drawn a lot of comments, here's a speedtest being on day 9 of my billing cycle w/ 600GB+ usage - https://www.speedtest.net/result/7808727971.png. Some people don't trust speedtest.net so I checked fast.com (netflix CDN) and got 580Mbps down, 540Mbps up.
Ready for this sub to rage? I've been working out of the Rogers building downtown Toronto (not for Rogers, mind you):
> Virginia has the fastest internet in America
I'm not sure I agree that Virginia has the fastest internet considering Tennessee has EPB which just announced 10 GBps fiber-to-the-home residential service.
You can have better connection and those forgotten people in caves with 1000ms will still kill you 10-15 sec after you killed them on your screen.https://www.speedtest.net/result/8911857612.png My connection for reference. P2P is horrible and bungie should feel bad for relying on it
To be honest if the low bandwidth streams keep up they are going to have to do this in the UK as well, I'm giving some real thought on cancelling based on the last couple of months.
I'm at 200mb+ down any speed service I test and they keep pushing me onto grainy what look like 480p at best streams and no I pay for the middle package not the basic one.
I don't expect 4k I just expect at least 720p and I'm just not seeing it.
The US also ranks 8th in fixed broadband connection speeds compared toFinland at 40th.
And considering how much bigger the US is and more spread out it is, I would say the US clearly has better internet.
Throw in the fact that according to this article, that is from 2010, all people only have the right to 1Mbps connections. It does say that they'll have everyone on 100Mbps by 2015.... but it's closing in on 2020 and they're only at 58Mbps. Government is great guys!
Ha ha! I wish I had Charter. If you had AT&T U-verse you wouldn't have anything bad to say about Charter. Or Comcast. Hell, my 4G internet from my phone is faster than my AT&T "24 Mbps" on most days.
Edit: Here's my "24 Mbps"
AT&T just rebranded their 4G network to try and 1-up Verizon without actually investing any money in their infrastructure.
Verizon 5G Ultra Wideband
AT&T 4G LTE
AT&T did this with 4G too, back in the day. While other carriers invested in 4G LTE, AT&T rebranded their HSPA+ as 4G, even though it wasn't nearly as fast. They somehow manage to be even shadier than the other big US carriers, don't fall for it
Only if you blindly believe Iranian state propaganda. Trump could declare free 100TB internet for everyone, infrastructure doesn't get created as easily as that.
In reality the US has, on average, the 8th best internet speeds worldwide. Iran has some of the worst in the world with 122 countries ahead of them. Source
> First place Bucharest, Romania is home to super-low ping, a lightning fast download speed and a thriving gaming culture. From Bucharest Gaming Week (which includes the CS:GO Southeast Europe Championship and the FIFA National Tournament) to their numerous local game studios, Bucharest is a great place to be a gamer whether you’re online or out and about.
I was on a gigabit connection so not long at all. A good rule of thumb is to go to www.speedtest.net, do the test, see how fast your internet is. That second number, the upload speed, divided by 8 is about what your upload should be in MB per second. So if you are getting a 10mbps upload speed you'll probably get like 1.25 MB/s so say 100 gigs is what your syncing. Math, math, math, and we've got about 22 hours on a relatively slow connection, 2 1/2 on a 100Mbps, and like 15-20 minutes on gig......... sorry used to work for an ISP.... =P
Link to rankings + some fun rivalry matchups
I'm disappointed that UCLA/Stanford aren't the 2 fastest ones since we're the birthplace of the internet
I don't get it... I mean it's not like anyone would use more dial up modems to increase the blocksize.
Why should anyone restrict their network based on a technology that's almost 2 decades out-of-date at this point?
Heck, [The global average internet speed was 5.6Mb/s] less than 4 years ago. Now it's 10x that
I'd be against a gigantic increase, but I think there's pretty clearly room to compromise on the blocksize without "adding more modems."
Romania, Thailand, France have better Internet speed than the USA according to the Speedtest Global Index. Laughing in Danish that is also higher than the USA.
Engineers in a lab, I'm sure. Regular consumers might have the bandwidth for it, but there are many factors influencing actual data rates, including backhaul, usage, device capabilities, etc. This is probably about as fast as it gets right now: (B66+B46+B46+B46+B4) https://www.speedtest.net/my-result/a/4988720048
I think you mean Romania.
And leader in Europe is currently Iceland
Holy hell I'm insanely jealous.
Comcast is the only ISP in my area. At $80 / month, I get 3.46 Mbps up. Using Plex from outside the house is a nightmarish joke.
Disconnect ≠ slow speeds.
If you are getting frequent disconnects, stop by the Tech Commons and they can hopefully help clear out all of the previous UCF settings/password/certificates so that you get a more stable connection across campus.
Some areas of campus still have slow WiFi when it gets overloaded with too many people all trying to connect in one area while all trying to watch netflix, youtube, facebook, whatever else. If you are having speed issues, complain to the UCF Service Desk at 407-823-5117 and let them know the exact location, time of day, etc that you were having the issue. Providing the results from speedtest.net or from speedtest.ucf.edu(unfortunately requires Java for now) might also be useful in helping them troubleshoot. You can also try complaining to the college of whatever building you are having problems in since department funding can sometimes be part of the reason why WiFi is spotty.
> Germans are comparatively slow on the Internet. According to the latest Speedtest Global Index, the Federal Republic of Germany is currently ranked 31st with 69.4 Mbit/s in the ranking of the countries with the fastest Internet access. This puts Germany in 25th place compared to 2017 and 2015 with 22nd place reached, worsened again.
> The Americans also enjoy fast internet. The USA ranks 8th with 117.3 Mbit/s.
Damn, and before I moved to Germany I thought US internet was already pretty mediocre.
Sites like www.speedtest.net optimize the test to get you the highest result possible; essentially they're trying to find out what your maximum speed is.
It's not a real world scenario.
Google's test will more accurately measure what your speed to their servers will be.
Any reason you didn't go for Visible? $25/m for unlimited everything. Also a $100 Virtual CC after 2 months. They are also on Verizon so you'll most likely get the same speeds as Xfinity Mobile. I've been on it for a little over a week now. Service and speeds have been brilliant.
Example speed test result: https://www.speedtest.net/my-result/a/5605330950
this is the site yo'ure telling me to use. Usa is 7'th on the global speed index there with 120.30 Mbps
Wich means the country everyone complains about having slow internet is one of the fastest according to that data.
Looks like you're all the way down in 91st place despite being over 16x smaller than the US. Imagine bragging about getting better internet speeds than Bubba in Montana.
Broadband improvement hai. Broadband speed nahi. Speed to abhi bhi China and US ki nearly 7 - 30 times zyada hai.
here. ki kahin zyada hai. And I dont think that India has an improvement of 18.8 Mbps. I think its average speed is only 18.8 Mbps and that too, not everywhere. https://www.speedtest.net/global-index/india
According to non ookla resorces the average speed of broadband in India is 6.5 Mbps which seems to ring truer.
Theoretically work from home demand shouldn’t come close to 1080p and 4k streaming demand at 9 shouldn’t it?
I’ve been doing intermittent speed tests all day all week and I’ve seen nothing different to usual speeds.
I’d like to add though the 4G network might come under more strain. Some companies are giving employees 4G dongles (paid for by company) to work from home. But Australia’s 4G network is great to start with anyway.
NBN: https://www.speedtest.net/result/9154523055.png Everything normal
4G: https://www.speedtest.net/result/9154528504.png Download normal but upload bad. Though I could check back in ten minutes and get wildly different speeds.
I can't believe they expect me to wait 17 whole minutes to patch the game dude. So unfair. =O
Europe is way ahead of North America.
I have fibre at home and truly unlimited LTE at nearly 150 Mbps for 20 USD / mo.
What American ISPs and carriers are doing is basically unprecedented in the West.
I’ve hit over 300mbps on T-Mobile LTE. I don’t think matching those speeds will be an issue once they receive sprints spectrum, if the merger goes though. https://www.speedtest.net/my-result/i/3568450514
When I moved I went from Comcast's fastest package at the time, 250 Mbps down and 25 Mbps up, to symmetrical gigabit and the internet now feels like an extension of my own home network. I don't have to use any traffic management rules at my router anymore, I can just let things go without any speed limitations, and everything else using the internet can't even tell I'm doing anything. I fully support everyone should have access to good symmetrical fiber connections, DSL & cable really do feel old after having fiber.
I'm on CenturyLink's price for life package for $65/month after taxes and fees.
Agree, Fiberlink 500 de la Digi, nu pica, nu limiteaza, ba chiar uneori primesc 750 mbps. (nu am afiliatii cu digi, doar am avut ocazia sa incerc si digi si romtelecom, am tras concluzia ca digi e mai ieftin si mai bun, asta in regiunea mea)
Granted a speed test isn't a true test of reliability, but the only time I haven't gotten those speeds was when my modem got a problematic firmware update.
Ok did this guide for AT&T routers on fiber, and now we're cooking!
Only question is, can I take off the AT&T router now /u/silvenga?
Getting 863/852 bypassing the router.
Look at Mr fancypants over here with 5-10 megabit upload speed. Meanwhile in Australia.
Good thing this isn't a speed test taken in the capital city of the country, that would just be depressing..... (Kill me).
Well, according to Ookla, the average mobile download speed in Afghanistan is 6.29mbps and upload speed is 2.70mbps. keep in mind that back in 2012 only between 5-10% of Afghans had internet though, and the download speed was around 0.56mbps, and wealthier, more westernized and technologically-savvy Afghans are likely to use Speedtest, and foreign military bases that use Speedtest may influence the results. Also, obviously the Taliban are not often residing in undamaged developed areas, so they will likely be using mobile or satellite data, which has much higher latency. Also, more tech-savvy members would probably have installed proxies or VPNs on their devices to avoid monitoring of their traffic and location by enemy forces.
Additionally, the vast majority of Taliban grunts would not have access to the internet at all, as the Taliban leadership sees it as a vector of Western corruption and immorality.
Data is gathered based on people who run speed tests. The chart's accurate title should be, "Average speed of users who decided to run a speed test while on their network."
We should know, and account for:
1. How many people ran the tests from each carrier.
2. Why are they initiating the tests? (New area? Slow speeds? Etc.)
3. What are other carrier speeds in similar locations at similar times?
4. Where were the tests run?
I could go on and on, but aggregating 85 million speed tests run from an app to provide an overall performance score is pretty lame.
FTTN. Connected last week. It all depends on your distance back to the node. Mine is approximately 392m.
Once your area goes live, you can go to https://futurebroadband.com.au/sq/ and enter your address. This will tell you what NBN estimates is possible for your address and so far I’ve found it to be accurate within 1Mbps over a few tested connections.
Also I’d suggest going with a high quality, highly skilled and transparent company such as Aussie Broadband.
If you like, I can assist you along the way and answer any questions you have. In exchange I’d ask that you use my referral code when signing up for Aussie Broadband so that we both get $50 credit. (I’m handing out my mums referral to get her a discount).
Refer-A-Friend Code: 1068923
Right let's take a look at this that tracks the amount of active 5G masts globally. Lets look at the UK and, more specifically, Scotland... since we're on r/Scotland.
There are only 14 active 5G masts in the whole country. The exact same number as there was at the beginning on the pandemic. So it doesn't look like there is any rush from any of the mobile providers to be upgrading the infrastructure during the pandemic. The number for the whole of the UK, 204 masts, has also remained the same since the beginning of the pandemic.
>or part of some plans to further an authoritative agenda, endgame being similar to how China operates?
How does one make the jump from "mobile technology that allows you to browse the web on your phone slightly quicker than on previous technology" to "iTs ThE sTaRt Of FaScIsM"? Gonny enlighten me because I just really can't get my head around that at all.
>Please show me the "public records of the money being given to these companies". I'll wait.
no need to wait long.
here's a brief summary of the money we've given telecom companies since <strong><em>1992</em></strong> that was intended to have provided the entirety of the country with fiber by the year 2000, along with sources.
seeing as most of our major cities don't even have an actual fiber network 20 years after the target date, you might be able to make the connection that half a trillion dollars worth of infrastructure hasn't been laid.
please, babe, do explain where all these hundreds of billions of taxpayers dollars went during years of already profitable business with no real infrastructure improvement to speak of.
>I also look forward to seeing how the US does not have a "modern network"
uh, sure. let's go check some unbiased speed comparisons.
what's that? the US doesn't make the top ten for average broadband speeds worldwide, and doesn't even crack the top 30 for worldwide mobile speeds? whaaaaat?
the other issue that the US has is that we have a massive rural population that isn't getting anywhere near "average" speeds. our average speed is about ~130Mbps according to the above speed tests, yet we have nearly half the country trying to get by with less than 5Mbps.
how the fuck do you think we have a modern network when so many people are relegated to internet speeds DSL owners got nearly 30 years ago on literal telephone lines?
...lemme guess, you think the Super Nintendo is still bleeding-edge tech in 2020.
Not because their is partially true, mine is entirely untrue. In most of the first world, internet speeds are increasing greatly, both in speed and in reach. A small percentage, or certain countries have ended up staying behind the curve. How does that equal "internet not getting quicker"?
Both are absolute statements. And if we are talking averages, given he didn't specify in the slightest, he's just plain wrong. https://www.speedtest.net/global-index
That's just not true. I routinely get slightly above the speeds advertised by my ISP for the specific speed tier I pay for, as do many others that post here. I pay for a 50/5 line and, even though I have lots of little services that constantly check things on the internet, and am currently listening to a track on Mixcloud, I still got speeds over the 50/5...
I have it. (yay, cause I was paying $105 for 15 mbps) I just did a speed test and got 67 download and 13 up. https://www.speedtest.net/result/8438840784 I then did a speed test on my phone and got just about the same 65 up 20 down. Do a speed test on your phone, the tmobile internet should be pretty close for speed.
Hijacking this since its at the top - sorry.
But OZG is AMAZING, I've had it for nearly 6mo and never had an outage. I have my router & modem hooked up to a UPS and even when my power goes out, the internet is still up and working. With COX I was having weekly outages and high packet-loss.
With COX I was going over my 1TB limit every month, with OZG I'm using nearly 5TB monthly and they dont have any issue with it, I love them. They also dont have any restrictions on what you can host from your home (At least that I know of)
Here's a speedtest I've taken
OZG is peered to Dallas, KC, and Chicago meaning you'll get some awesome pings to any data-centers in those areas. I get ~15ms ping to any data-center in Dallas and 30ms to Chicago. It's amazing. I couldn't recommend then enough
centurylink symmetrical gigabit, no cap.
speedtest to sandy fiber:
speedtest to centurylink seattle:
speedtest to comcast Sacramento, CA:
920 down / 970 up
1ms Unloaded / 3ms loaded
It's always nice to hear some praise once in a while :)
For me it's practically indistinguishable: with and without the VPN. Being relatively close to big exchanges helps quite a bit!
For comparison, I'll add that I've had CenturyLink gigabit fiber for the past year, and it's been rock solid. $80 a month. If you can get it, jump on it.
Colorado Springs, CO.
This was a Speedtest taken as requested by T-Force due to ongoing speed complaints. I’ve been shaking their cage since APRIL of last year.
Today I’m paying off my phones and leaving. They’re already unlocked for military travel.
Toimii, muttei sitä tarvii käyttää. Vodafonelta saat prepaid liittymän, joka sisältää 80gb 4G mobiilidataa, rajattomasti puheluita ja tekstareita Ukrainan sisällä, 30min ulkomaanpuheluita, sekä jonkun musiikin suoratoistopalvelun 1kk ajan hintaan 2,35€.
Tässä on speedtestin tulokset, jotka tein äsken mobiilidatalla.
Not sure why there is such a hard on for mobile network speed. Your capped at 8gb. It's not like your sharing this with the whole family and friends at home.
Anywho...... I'm getting 29 down in Ottawa South.
Check out my Speedtest result! How fast is your internet? https://www.speedtest.net/my-result/a/4431071485
This is fast enough for my Reddit addiction, downloading of music and watching the occasional video. I'm not racing torrents on this connection.
> the internet completely disconnects (Has highest signal but not really connected to the internet)
-The strength of the wifi signal doesnt tell you how strong ur internet is. It only tells you between your laptop and the router.
-Sometimes its not etisalats fault. Sit with your laptop next to the router with cleat path and test the speed using speedtest.net and using fast.com. Someitmes steams servers cant give you the full speed.
-Another thing to do is change the wifi password and make sure no one using the network is torrenting or consuming ur bandwidth. Check for old wires and if ur router is old replace it with new one.
Denver is a tough market for all the carriers due to non-contiguous spectrum.
T-Mobile has 10x10 LTE on AWS A block. In November 2015, they refarmed half of the F block from HSPA+ to make another 5x5 LTE channel, leaving the other half of F block for HSPA. We also then have 5x5 on 700 A block (B12). All of the PCS band is still GSM/HSPA+
We have seen some reports of carrier aggregation starting to pop up, but I think it's a site by site basis, and not across the metro area because I have yet to see it.
Realistically, you should expect about 5-15 Mbps in Denver. Ookla's speed test's show that T-Mobile is the fastest, but if you believe Root Metrics, Verizon is the fastest (although I've never been able to replicate Root Metric's findings).
compared to Los Angeles: http://www.speedtest.net/awards/us/los-angeles-ca
Open Signal also usually gives a pretty accurate picture of how the networks are in an area: http://opensignal.com/
vaikimis on sellel Huawei E3372 4G pulgal peal mingine see tore tarkvara mis muutab pulga usb ethernet seadmeks ja arvutile järgi ühendades hakkab see pulk NAT'i tegema ja ei lase seal pulga sees olevale modemile otse ligi pääseda, ma panin sinna peale vanema ja natuke muudetud tarkvara et saaksin otse modemit confida ja et saaksin ise enda ruuteris teha NAT'i ning pordi suunamisi kuna Tele2 on praegu ainuke mobiilse neti pakkuja eestis kes annab ilma mingi lisa tasuta sulle välise ip aadressi mis näiteks teeb võimalikuks torrenti protokolli kasutamise kui ka muu väljastpoolt sisse pääsu mida ma ise kasutan selleks et kodus olevast meedia serverist filme ja muusikat enda telefoni ja läpakase striimida kui ma kodus pole.
kiirus mida ma siin metsadevahel kätte saan on selleks täiesti piisav kuigi upload võiks parem olla https://www.speedtest.net/result/4415619432.png
pulk ise on seina peale kruvitud ja välise antenniga mis õues akna taga on saan ma kätte päris hea levi, nii umbes kolm pulka neljast
If that's the case then I'd really not be surprised if it's speedtest.net who are redirecting you themselves. It's easy for your ISP to redirect you by just messing with their own DNS, which is why they'd do it that way if it was them; hijacking your actual traffic is a lot more work for little added benefit.
Try going to https://www.speedtest.net (ie use HTTPS instead of HTTP in the URL). You should get one of two results:
If it says connection refused, or your browser starts blaring security warnings, then your ISP is probably attempting to hijack connections with Speedtest; or
If you end up at the site you're already seeing, then Speedtest are probably voluntarily redirecting you themselves.
EDIT: And /u/TheBigLowBowSki was complaining that we suck because other subreddits give free IT advice. I guess we've shown him!
Volgens elke bron die ik kan vinden klopt dit niet.
It's not on my side. This is a week after buying the game. I got a 20 streak yesterday but that challenge on the screen is left incomplete at the top of the lobby mocking me whilst I wait.
I'm about ready for a refund.
Anyone who hasn't bothered to look at any of the 5G distribution maps which clearly reveal that, say, there is no 5G in Iran, and proceeds to spout off this nonsense is still a certified idiot, though.
Given Stadia Base will be basically a free virtual console that has the gameplay capabilities of a PS4, why would there be an assumption that games would be discounted in general on top of that? And this article doesn't even mention that Google did state there will be discounts for Pro members (what that means I don't know... could end up being terrible discounts, but nevertheless should be noted).
I dunno, I feel like 90% of people writing articles or posting online just trigger on the word "Stadia" now and doesn't even try to look at the benefits. Like the fact that the Base model is free so you don't need to buy a console to play new games, or that you can use it with mouse and keyboard on ANY computer / tablet for people who travel around but still want to play games as long as you have semi decent internet, or that it literally eliminates P2P gaming/lag issues because the hardware to hardware connection is on Google's side now. Hell, I even see people complaining about latency and internet speed all the time, even though Google had a 40 minute conference mostly going over how they combated latency for Stadia and the average internet speed for the US is over 90 Mbps.
Whether it's Google's fault for doing a poor job on explaining their product, or just people not liking things changing, I don't know...but this feels almost the same as when the Nintendo Switch was announced and everyone shat on it without actually having an open mind on the product.
No issues with my iPhone XS or my iPad Pro on iOS 13.
I’m on a 300/50 Mbps connection and getting a little more than that.
There are a number of diagnosis tools embedded in OW. To use them:
Now there is a number of things that can go wrong and how you can detect each issue:
- If FPS numbers are not stable over time OR GPU temperature keeps rising beyond limits for you card, something might be wrong with your GPU settings or hardware (e.g. a fan not working properly leading to overheating). I have similiar HW and settings and stay in the 60deg range.
- If you keep seeing three dots instead of one behind the FPS number, this is the famous reduce buffering issue. Uncheck + check (toggle x2) ther reduce buffering setting
- If SIM value (3rd value in top row of network graph toggled by CTRL-SHIFT-N) is not stable around 10 ms (which you should have with your settings), a hardware issue or unwanted guest software issue is likely.
- If ping is unstable (in normal game not test range): Your internet connection is affected. Check router, cables and your ISP perforamnce with a tool like https://www.speedtest.net. If ping or DL/UL rates are fluctuating by say +/-100%, it might be an ISP issue.
Metro By T-Mobile
Location: Honey Brook, PA/West Caln Township
Bands 2 and 12 2x CA
Band 2: -122dbm
Band 12: -109dbm
Download: 19.9 Mbps
Upload: 2.77 Mbps
Less than $10/month. No traffic limits or any limits.
When a shitty country is doing way batter than you, I wonder how come you are not on the stress rioting. You pay $50/mo for gigabit AND you are happy?
Laughing in Romanian.
On Average T-Mobile is faster. Whilst there are Sprint sites that produce fast results https://www.speedtest.net/my-result/a/3803309076 many don't.
A more recent one from a different location https://www.speedtest.net/my-result/a/4459145274
Disregard u/knumbknuts, he or she must be misinformed. I've had direct fiber optic, non DSL, AT&T Fiber in Normal Heights for about a year and it's the best connection I've ever had PERIOD!!! Probably the best in the USA.
Speedtest, just now: https://www.speedtest.net/my-result/d/f9231fef-f3f6-4de0-ad58-dc20e3e607f7
$80 a month, no caps, unlimited data...
I regularly get accused of cheating while online gaming due to the low pings, shredding others and I don't cheat.
I upload huge videos to my wife overseas on Google Drive, usually in less than a minute.
I had Cox Gigablast DOCSIS 3.1 before and it was great downloading, but the upload speed were capped at 35 Mbps. Uploading was a painstaking task and the gaming latencies were horrible.
I did have to spend a little money upgrading all of my switches, cables, router to Gigabit in order to take full advantage of the new speeds. I used the Ubiquiti EdgeRouter Lite.
I'm really bummed. My wife returns in December and her condo in UTC doesn't have AT&T Fiber :-(((
It ain't 980, but 920-940 is pretty solid: https://www.speedtest.net/result/9781261405
I just ran OpenSpeedTest on two separate devices on my network:
Device A: (OST's 'Seattle' Server): 930mbps / 120mbps
Device B: (OST's 'Albany' Server): 950mbps / 800mbps
There can be quite a bit of variance on these tests to external servers due to a number of different factors relating to your ISP or the servers used for the speed test.
I just ran a speed test and I am getting 194 down (higher than normal) and 6 up (normal), with normal ping. No noticeable lag or disconnects while working from home or playing PS4 on personal time.
Edit: download the Ookla "Speedtest" app for your phone or use desktop browser and go to https://www.speedtest.net/ to test. I noticed that I occasionally connect to a server in Corvallis and my speeds take a nosedive, but when connected to Portland, I'm normally fine.
How fast is it and who's the provider? With that info we can probably tell if that's in the ball park. https://www.speedtest.net/
Anyway sounds reasonable if it's a mid-range or higher plan with one of the big providers, especially if it's not bundled with cable TV or phone (internet connection by itself is more expensive).
Only since December. We use it in a RV and needed to find something to use a lot of data while in Mexico for 2 weeks. Probably won’t keep it as we won’t use the RV again until summer. 2+ months away. We have Verizon postpaid and I have an iPad/hotspot line that’s only $10/month but after 15GB it slows to 600kps. Which is fine for most weekend trips we take but the 2 weeks over the winter it’s not good enough.
Speeds are great. Post paid priority for first 22GB. In my home area I get 100Mbps+ and most places while driving is 20Mbps+ even after 22GB.
Here’s a Speedtest while in Vegas about 4 blocks from the strip sitting at about 35Gb usage.
Can’t relate. Not saying Verizon is bad, but in my areas T-Mobile has packed lots of network upgrades so it’s the best for what I’m doing and where I am.
In practice, I managed to get more than 50Mbps for my Internet occasionally, of course in Tanjung Tokong. Like this one which I took last month https://www.speedtest.net/result/8286457842.png Pretty impressive download speed I must say.
Yep, even out to international. Obviously not as fast, but still very decent. With pretty much every major content provider using global CDNs, international speed isn't relavent anymore, except connecting to Sydney as that's the closest final hop for many CDNs and service providers (like Amazon/AWS, who do not operate in NZ).
Here's an example speedtest to Sydney from Wellington, from my mobile (via WiFi) connected to a stock ISP-provided router, and I'm a room away from the router.
4/22 at about 4:07am
Device: Oneplus 6T
Location: Bakersfield California at a local gas station.
3xCA bands 12,2,4
Carrier: Metro by T-Mobile
Results: 249mbps down and 10.4mbps up.
my 2 cent
City: Halifax, NS
Service: Residential Dynamic IP
Speed: 500 down , 500 up
Ports Blocked: None
Proof since I'm always asked for it. haha
It's a daily occurrence for me to get 400/40, so download speeds 4 times better than the max most people can get on the NBN.
Yes, we get to keep it :)
This is what I'm getting at the moment via WiFi for reference
Maybe cause they have found shit loads more cheaters, slow laggy shit games time and time again..
I'm in Australia, speedtest has me at 92meg. https://www.speedtest.net/result/9828278227
Every night I have games searching for 174+ ping on games
I never said it won’t in the future, and your results are due to good conditions, however for most people 500 Mbps+ isn’t obtainable on wifi, stabile around the home. Take a look in the Home Networking sub Reddit and if you ask most of them, they’ll tell you the same thing. 500 Mbps+ should not be expected around the home on WiFi and is a big ask (currently) with consumer hardware. I am on a clear 5GHz channel, and I got this result a few feet from my router. It is normally 900, 700, when hardwired.
recentniji podaci iz 2019. mobilni internet 14. najbrži, no fixni broadband je slab. osobno imam optiku 500 download 250 upload 1 ping i mislim da smo doživjeli skok u kvaliteti interneta u zagrebu baš sredinom prošle godine kad se po zagrebu uvodila optika, pa bi to moglo izmjeniti podatke.
AT&T Fiber 1000/1000 is $90/month and has no transfer limit. It's a LOT more reliable than my Cox cable used to be. Download speeds have suffered a bit recently with everyone at home, but I don't notice in real world usage.
Just because you have no problems, doesn't mean the netcode isn't ass. Delay based netcodes are objectively bad and till they implement rollback netcode it will remain bad.
And here's my internet.
This has nothing to do with internet speed. Your computer having these issues is more related to some sort of malware. Get a good AV program, and download and run malwarebytes. These problems most definitely signify an issue with your individual computer, and NOT the internet connection.
Now - on to a bit about speed tests. Most speed test apps provided by the ISP route directly to servers inside their network, and via the closest amount of hops, and usually performs the test using a function built in to their routers. You will definitely get the fastest speed from that test. I'd recommend running a speed test on www.speedtest.net or one on DSLReports. Those two are significantly more accurate than an ISP's test. It not only uses other servers, on the actual internet, but adds in the additional factor of your PC.
Second, what you get from a speed test != actual speeds. 905Mbit is about 114MB/s. That's the speed to the speed test server. But... depending on how many hops you need to get to another server, such as google, your speed will deteriorate a bit. It also depends on speed limitations and server load at the other end. Not only that, but your computer needs to be up to par, as processing speed, and disk speed factor in to these things as well. Essentially, if you have "gigabit class" internet, the chances of you actually downloading and/or uploading using "gigabit class" speeds are pretty slim.
>the French have shit internet
That's a curiously peculiar statement.
"Shit" is a very relative term when the average internet speed throughout Europe ranges from... 6 to 19 Mbps.
Additionally, the speed of French broadband lines is actually amongst the highest in Europe. Only Romania, Switzerland and Monaco are ranked higher.
Overall, broadband is already the norm over here, and it's dirt cheap (for the anecdote, I'm paying 15€/mo for a flawless 200 Mbps FTTH optic fiber + phone).
Now, the actual (but quite minor, really) issue France has regarding its internet network isn't qualitative in nature. It's a coverage issue, and two combined factors are behind it:
Either way, the situation may not be perfect, but I think claiming that we have a "shit internet" is, maybe, quite a stretch.
ITC is one of the best companies i'v ever rented from.
I'v had all of them, mobily, stc, zain, nothing even comes close to ITC.
MS is 6 to 8 permanently.
Download is 240+ permanently
Upload is 64+ permanently
IF i they had a higher internet package i would rent it without question.
Check this :
PS, never had a disconnection, nor slowdown, nor hiccup.
About the same as always for me. Spectrum has never been reliable, it was actually out for us entirely late last night, but I haven't seen any pattern of speed drops during the day.
I am a bit further down Magnolia though, between Buena Vista and Victory.
I'm sure your post will be taken down for violation of rule 6, but this is the current state of Sprint in certain markets. I once got 0.04 Mbps download speeds and nearly half a second of ping with moderate LTE signal. Seems like a case of heavy deprioritization.
Here's the link to my result https://www.speedtest.net/my-result/a/5639329291
Dude Verizon doesn’t suck here in speeds.. Roanoke I’m pulling 100-200 Mbps.. but sometimes up in the mountains I lose connection with my Verizon and ATT line but somehow not my Sprint.
You're getting download speed and ping confused. Download speed is how much you can download in a second, ping is how long it takes for a signal to get from one place to another. If your ping to the PS Now servers is high, no amount of download speed will remove the lag. Check your ping using Speed Test and you'll hopefully get a better idea.
Whether it's something wrong on your end is hard to say but there are ways of lowering ping. An easy one would be using a wired connection instead of wifi but if that doesn't work you still have some potential options and they're pretty easy to find if you look online for ways to reduce ping.
I've had consistently good speed since activation, first day was the slowest other than the 4th of July.
I'm definitely not a Visible employee either.
Check out my Speedtest result! How fast is your internet? https://www.speedtest.net/my-result/a/5133745875
You probably have a DSL connection. A quirk of that technology is that it shits itself if you max out your upload speed. OneDrive allows you to set a maximum upload speed.
First, find your actual upload speed, you can use this site: https://www.speedtest.net/
That gives you Mbit, we want it in KB/s, here's a tool for that https://www.gbmb.org/mbps-to-kbs
Right click on OneDrive in the task bar, then go Settings -> Network -> Upload rate -> Limit to: Set the limit to something below your upload speed.
I got 5.7 Mbit from the speedtest which is 712 KB/s, so I set mine to 500 KB/s to be on the safe side.
Settings -> Network -> Upload rate -> Limit to:
Now you can let OneDrive upload to it's heart's content without internet becoming unresponsive.
Honestly our internet is amazing. It's evening time, so my connection is a bit slower than normal...but 725 isn't too bad. :
Actually that link is not necessarily reflecting the truth yet could be very well a Selective Recognition (searching for what you "expect" to find). Practical test results always come from external sources having lots of user samples, instead of some company giving numbers.
Here's the real test results from the most used service of all; https://www.speedtest.net/global-index and to them it's Korea (overall, not separating Mobile vs Fixed) since it always was Korea as researched this yearly since after learning that few years back.
Not sure what would be the best ISP, but I've been using Lanet in Kyiv for more than three years so far. Speedtest reports ~73 Mbps download speed from a random Amsterdam server, and it costs me UAH 169 (which is ~$6.5) a month.
Slight correction. I have Spectrum 400 mbps and I have an Arris sb6183 which is DOCSIS 3.0. I get 440 down and 22 up.
The 6183 is a 16 channel modem and is fully capable of 400mpbs.
I have Utopia/Xmission as well. Here is my speedtest to xmission and here is one to New York. Upload is a bit slow today.
Galaxy Note8 :3
[email protected] Inside*
*My apartment building has 3 TMobile LTE towers mounted on the roof
Hollywood, Los Angeles
And yet in a world full of displays capable of at least 1080p the vast majority of the streams my plex server, full of 4k content, pushes out ranges somewhere between 480p and 720p.
Most Americans do not have an internet connection capable of streaming 4k. Some would struggle with a quality 1080p stream. Sure, there are the 1 percenters that have gigabit connections. Most Americans don't have a gigabit connection, up or down. It's not their fault that they don't. So most Americans are unable to 'get with the times'.
The 2018 Q4 Ookla Speedtest report back up my statements: https://www.speedtest.net/reports/united-states/
And keep in mind that the report's data is likely biased to those that actually care about their internet connection speed. Call it a "tech savvy" bias. I would wager that if 100% of Americans were to run the speed test tool that the numbers would be lower by a factor of 10-15%.
Good job discriminating most people based on their lack of available gigabit broadband options.
I just signed up yesterday, but they must not be throttling me. I'm not sure if they deprioritize or not though, but I took this outside my work in a downtown area this morning (so, probably a reasonable number of people in the area). https://www.speedtest.net/result/a/4859527485.png
Check out my Speedtest result! How fast is your internet? https://www.speedtest.net/my-result/a/4853596329
Just did a speed test here in Lake Mary (outside of Orlando, FL). These speeds couldn't happen on a 6s. So it can make a difference.
Regione Velocità download - Velocità upload
Valle d’Aosta 30,59 – 11,46
Piemonte 31,59 – 12,51
Liguria 30,72 – 11,98
Lombardia 30,77 – 12,07
Veneto 29,10 – 11,16
Trentino-Alto Adige 29,89 – 11,26
Friuli-Venezia Giulia 27,39 – 10,62
Emilia-Romagna 32,29 – 11,96
Marche 30,51 – 11,21
Toscana 29,59 – 11,64
Umbria 27,26 – 10,79
Lazio 28,07 – 11,29
Abruzzo 27,40 – 10,89
Molise 22,55 – 9,63
Campania 27,69 – 11,75
Puglia 25,59 – 10,49
Basilicata 22,30 – 10,41
Calabria 27,97 – 11,44
Sicilia 26,37 – 10,79
Sardegna 25,24 – 10,35
This happens with any kind of gun for me. I run an ethernet cable to my laptop and get 245+mbps that probably helps my ping. Not sure if I live close to the EU servers though.
Sorry but it's not Psyonix. The cubes mean you are having packet loss. It doesn't matter how fast your connection or ping are, packet loss has nothing to do with it. You are losing information somewhere between you and your internet provider.
I'll use a traffic analogy that helped me understand. Imagine your internet speed is the speed of cars flying down a 2 way highway. Each car driving away from you is a packet of information getting sent to your internet provider, and every car coming towards you is a packet of information coming from your internet provider. Now imagine one of those cars just flies off the shoulder and crashes. The other cars can just maintain speed and keep traveling, hence why your internet speed stays fast. But that crashed car will never get to you. The information in that crashed car can be something like "Ball position moves 20 inches left", but you will never receive that information, hence why the ball will skip around the screen.
Packet loss usually shows in a percentage. If you download the speed test app you can go into further detail to find out how bad your packet loss is. I would suggest contacting your internet provider to get it fixed, it could be an interference problem somewhere in their lines or in your house.