What is Reddit's opinion of
TinEye?
From 3.5 billion Reddit comments
100 reviews of this app found across Reddit:
This image appears to be photoshopped.
A reverse image search reveals that the image of the moon is just a stock moon photo, with the image of the aircraft added afterwards.
Your title is misleading. Even in the archive you posted, the reply comment shows what it really is.
>Except it's dyshidrosis, which an annoying but fairly harmless allergic reaction.
Not cancer.
Edit: In response to /u/blaghart and any others who think he may have been searching for hand/skin cancer. In the top comment of the thread this archive is linking to, the user cropped the image and did a reverse image search. He says he may have been searching for "skin cancer on hands". However, the exact photo we see in the picture and the article he links to goes to this website. In the article, the author writes about how she has Dyshidrosis. Not cancer. Also, when doing a reverse image search of the image, almost all images link to articles about Dyshidrosis. Google image results filter based on relevancy, so it's most likely that this person was not searching for hand cancer.
Now could I be wrong? Sure. But all evidence is pointing to this guy was just looking up a skin allergy.
Zyklon B was the poisonous gas used by the Nazis in the death camps.
When you search for images, the only ones that look like yours are from pinterest and the ones that are in museums look totally different.
Using tineye on the pinterest image isn't helpful.
Looks like a modern day tin can. Maybe it's a fake produced by some neo-Nazi merch company? Hopefully some WWII buff finds this and puts it to rest.
This is stupid. A reverse image search of photos of the moon will output a lot of similar pictures. You can even use TinEyes "compare match" feature to see slight variations.
You can do that with basically every moon photo... for example with one that I shot - apparently also a stock photo.
The chart used is for the PC version of the COD games only. Even though the source seems to no longer exist a reverse lookup shows the links specifically say this is for the PC version and only for NA.
https://tineye.com/search/001b92ed12c83f0e91ccdf9ba72d18858cc1c976/
This post is extremely misleading.
It's been posted at least 37 times since 2013.
That's just that one iteration of it. Here's the full tineye search.
Edit: Still cool if you havn't seen it before. Just don't be surprised it people on reddit call you out for a repost. It's just so far from OC.
Your granny features in a Getty Images stock photos collection of Woodstock? She sure did get around.
https://tineye.com/search/5e19fda9612cbf14d973af69eb9537a957456373/
Même si ça change pas grand chose, ces insultes sont vieilles de deux ans, au moins, donc pas à lier directement à l'élection de Trump.
The original image itself is pretty old (ca. ~2008), then someone photoshopped a cat into it as well.
Google Images is your friend for this sort of thing.
Also useful is TinEye.
Then there's RevEye, a Chrome extension that lets you search a bunch of services.
Here's one that currently doesn't even show up in tineye . Hmmm.
i would tend to agree, but it checked out on tineye.
https://tineye.com/search/0f52c183b12eed86a81dd9bbb3fec351bab52562/
so at least it's original enough for reverse image search to have missed it up until now.
> Google's reverse image search would not be fooled by that.
I bet it would. It was a cropped version of the picture with a color change.
Just to make sure I tried it. I did an image search for popular and picked the first one.
I did a reverse image search: here and got back 25+ results.
I opened it in paint, cropped it, and uploaded to imgur and ran the test again. It found it! I'm starting to think I'm 100% wrong.
I opened it in gimp2 and inverted it and no results were found.
I'm guessing you could just keep trying until it couldn't find it but you could be correct.
100% fake unless part of the child trafficking involves making them pose for stock photos...
My question: Why do this? Why make fake shit like this? Is it LARPing/creative fiction writing? Is it to scam money out of gullible conspiracy theorists? Is it just to slander political figures by any means necessary, including outright deceit?
Yeah, plenty of red flags here, e.g. the image of the computer is not from the computer in question, just a stock photo. Personally I would never buy a computer without at least a copy of receipts from the original purchase.
But, if you want to go ahead with this and given that he actually shows up:
- Have someone else hold the cash, and stick around in the other end of the store till you've verified the machine is working and that you want to purchase it.
- Have him log onto the user account on the Mac to verify the specs, that it's working, and that the machine is not remotely locked. The least techie thieves will not know how to reformat or reinstall the OS, so he'll be locked out of the computer, and may even be locked out with "Find My..." service from the original owner.
- Check that the machine is unpaired from "Find My"-service to prevent it being locked and erased, even though this is not a big deal, it's due diligence.
- Reboot the machine into Recovery Mode to see that it is not firmware locked. The least likely thing to happen, but this would prevent you reinstalling the OS at all, so you better check that this checks out.
This guy just put a really old gif in gifv format so it can't be run through KarmaDecay. I don't really care about reposts but that's pretty fucking scummy. It's reposted so much too. It's not even that good, it's been cropped and fucked up so many times over. Just stop.
https://tineye.com/search/404e90867b5b48d3fb4008ad550acfd4013fa498/
Original post appears missing from Reddit other than one time in Tiny Trumps.
My best guess is that it probably isn't original. The image itself dates back to last year. First crawled occurrence of a version with blushes is from January 7th
OP may not have even noticed the blushes originally.
I thought you were talking about a higher-resolution image like this
but then realized you probably meant the title.
Whoa... so I reverse image searched this, and it came up with a behind the scenes shot from a Victoria's Secret fashion show in 2015.
The only thing is that the girl's face appears to be completely shopped in. Check out the compare option, and it'll let you switch between the two photos. It's super weird.
So, either way, you're right. The majority of the picture seems to be from 2015.
Actually.... although this same light switch has been shown over and over, this particular image has not. It just might be an original by OP...
Check out:
https://tineye.com/search/e439e0036a267769a45ff146cc508d43416394a9/
I ran it thru tineye but couldn't find anything. This is either an elaborate ruse or the work of a seriously deluded person (who is supposedly the father of seven children)
I've never understood why people have to insult people who don't know how to find something. Maybe it's smart people who don't realize that not everyone is smart at the things that they're smart at. Does this have something to do with narcissism or is it it's own version of stupidity/laziness.
@OP try https://tineye.com it can help sometimes find things by pictures rather than words.
Num primeiro momento, essa imagem nos passa a ideia de total apatia e desprezo, com o retrato de um senhor que casualmente caminha ao lado de sua bicicleta, entre destroços de um protesto e diante de um iminente conflito entre policiais e manifestantes.
É aí que estamos enganados: o senhor da imagem é Martin Friederich Büler, um historiador alemão e ativista contra o abuso das forças policiais, reconhecido por estar presente nas manifestações de Hamburgo, e ser responsável por prevenir a violência policial em alguns casos, sempre através do mesmo modo: caminhando entre policiais e manifestantes, de roupa social e com sua bicicleta ao lado.
Dessa imagem podemos tirar diversas conclusões, dentre elas:
Nem tudo é o que parece. Na verdade, quase nunca é. Especialmente na Internet. Pesquise antes de tomar qualquer conclusão, sempre. A pesquisa reversa de imagens está aí pra isso.
Caso não queira sentir os efeitos do abuso do Estado numa manifestação, basta ser homem, branco, velho e com cara de rico.
The oldest place I've found it is back in 2008 on some russian site
(The link is to the Tineye results)
That ain't your pic OP, why's you lyin'?
Edit: It is OP's photo, I had just seen it cross-posted from /r/itookapicture apparently, and assumed this was the normal stolen repost. Apologies to /u/skalex , and I withdraw the charges from Karmacourt.
278 posting's across the internet. Let's play a game of Count how many times this has been on Reddit.
This isn't your fucking dog. You are a troll who is promoting content that isn't yours to get karma to use for native advertising purposes later.
https://tineye.com/search/77804330cbe577e2d20e4dc3b496d6bb45cd6793/
A few more tips to add:
Improving search results: When using Google reverse image search (in Chrome, right-click + Search Google for image), make sure to check the "visually similar images" section. Sometimes you get an image that has been cropped from its original form and this can help identify the original size. If it finds the proper one, run a search on that one and it will yield more results.
Searching for image info (model name, etc.): If the model name doesn't come up in the default search results, click "All sizes" under "Find other sizes of this image." From there, click through each image as the name may be displayed in the information window that appears underneath. This is a quick way of checking without having to load up the whole site (which can sometimes be spammy or otherwise questionable).
Searching for best quality image: This is something I almost always do before posting here. Going back to the "All sizes" page, it will show the resolution specs for each matched image, but be wary of some of the images that look like they have a large resolution-- a lot of the time they're just blown up images of a smaller resolution so it looks like shit when you zoom in. A good way to distinguish these is to open a couple in a new tab by clicking "View Image" and click back and forth between the tabs. You'll see a noticeable difference in quality.
Once in a blue moon when Google is unable to ID the image, I've had luck with https://tineye.com. I very rarely need it, but it's a pretty good image search engine.
/edit bzw Original /
I used reverse image search and the earliest use of the picture was from the twitter decrying her as his wife in 2016 and it claimed she was a Turkish child bride.
Child brides are especially common among poor families in the Middle East and this is well known. That is why it was laughable when the UNICEF started their anti child bride commercials and had a white guy as the offender.
https://tineye.com/search/37562f243a980cf65c6fa99f054270be95c83342/?sort=crawl_date&order=asc
Nice try, OP but TinEye says BS. Also, I agree that the second picture looks an awful lot like Monroe Lee.
Care to provide some verification?
Hey OP, have you heard of a reverse image search? You can use a site like tineye.com, paste your image link and it will search previous postings of that image.
Your image returns 139 results dating back to 2016. What’s the point in passing this off as your own work?
They're college girls, it seems. A Tineye search tracked the pic to a "UCSB Party Girls 2014" album (link provided for research purposes).
Liar. This has been posted to reddit at least 70 times.
are you the same liar that posted this shit earlier, just a different account?
You don't have to lie to have friends, so /r/quityourbullshit
No... no you didn't.
As mind boggling to find out, but apparently the photo was taken in 1955. So getting a high-res version will be quite...
But a little help/reverse-searching can't hurt.
It's an image that has been bouncing around the net since at least 2013, usually without context. The original context may not even be retrievable.
You're welcome, and I guess it's worth pointing out that this was found with Tineye which lets you sort by size as well as age and a couple of other ways, and can be integrated into a browser. Also right-clicking an image in Chrome lets you search Google by the image, which sometimes doesn't work as well.
That's what I use. Keep in mind, it is photos of paintings. Not digitally created, so the blacks in each section are not the same, etc
Maybe TinEye can find a better one for you?
edit: found a bigger one
Are we just letting people google "grilled cheese" and post what they find for upvotes? As /u/brieg91 said, they're not even the same sandwich.
https://tineye.com/search/ef85d189282c2221b1aeeca1732a371367191cab/
https://tineye.com/search/940fa4d6907a9c042400fe4c727bcab1bc82c8dc/
https://tineye.com/search/9ccfac754ba41f6a2ecea288e10efcf461efa9af/
My guess is that the girl's shirt was just solid black in the original image, given that nothing but bad Photoshops appear in a reverse image search.
A TinEye search led me to this DeviantArt page from an account that has since been deactivated. It seems plausible to me that the image originated there, but there's no model name given (or any other information, for that matter) so we're probably out of luck.
I did. At the very least, you can find more pixels and more dynamic range:
http://pix.avaxnews.com/avaxnews/da/83/000183da.jpeg
https://tineye.com/search/5dc24bdc0882dcb3d8bfef26300428b8af8312cf/
This actually isn't New Jersey at all. a quick reverse image search proves that this was certainly fabricated.
The Moon in the same phase tends to always look the same, so it’s no surprise that you will find similar moon photos online.
I see no indication that the photos that were found are perfect pixel matches. The matches you did find do seem to be, in fact quite distinct (I’m not talking about the color, I’m talking about slight but noticeable changes in shadows.)
Your technique works for stolen photos that are unique, but the moon really isn’t alle that unique, so image search machines will also find object matches (the same object, but photographed by a different photographer), not just literal file matches.
Just to give you a demonstration: I took a random photo of the moon from Flickr and searched for it: https://tineye.com/search/77a41f042e01f85955211989da5f4fd42f303e81/
https://tineye.com/search/57df7b981e7ca641f1a85ab938e8bca10c9834f9/?extension_ver=chrome-1.1.5
nor anywhere else. Surely this amazing, rule 1-compliant post deserves to be at the top of the subreddit!
Pozele alea sunt publice? Le poti gasi pe net? Daca da, unde? Daca nu - am o sugestie: scrie-i fetei, pe Facebook. "mah femeie, uite au aparut pozele astea cu tine in telefonul meu, habar n-am cum, tu unde le-ai pus? Hai sa investigam cum s-a intamplat asta, ca poate nici tie nu-ti convine sa-ti apara poze random pe telefonul unor straini". Cred ca ea te poate ajuta mai mult sa dezlegi misterul decat te-am putea ajuta noi.
[edit] Nu am zis cum le poti cauta pe net/ sa afli daca pozele sunt publice. In principiu, se cheama "reverse image search", https://tineye.com/ si http://images.google.com stiu sa faca chestia asta (click pe iconita cu aparatul foto, in cazul lui Google Images). Si pe Facebook pare sa existe https://www.facebook.com/ReverseImageSearchtool/, poti incerca si ala, mai ales daca pozele-s de pe FB (nu l-am folosit niciodata, nu stiu cat de bun e)
/r/quityourbullshit
You did not. This image has been posted on numerous sites, the earliest I found was from 2014. So fucking stop. You did not see this guy today.
Source: https://tineye.com/search/6233ed71daf2f8bec03919cb4dff3b2940a42139/?extension_ver=chrome-1.2.0
Are you saying the bird isn't actually on the deer's head? This reverse image search shows the picture first appearing in August 2013.
If it is a Photoshop, it is excellent work. But I think it's just a dead bird on a deer.
>Please you MUST read the ad COMPLETELY before contacting....$60/Night Weekend.... Beautiful 2BedRooms Apt SHOTGUN 2share in a building Complex.... All utilities included A large Room, Balcony, Central A.C, FREE PARKING LOT, Surveillance Camera, FREE WI-FI and Satellite Dish available as well...The Location surrounded with Multiple Shopping Centers, less then 10(ten)minutes from the French Quarter, CBD, Freret Street, Tulane , Loyola Universities and Audubon Zoo & parks... I'm a Single quiet French Black guy come from NYC and seeking a Single MATURE FEMALE Only... Pleeease NO DRUGS or DRAMA Allow(ed)... Contact "ZO". Call Only
Saving the text in case the ad gets pulled. Too lazy to grab the pictures although the dog in the swing is cute but is also a meme that has been around for year.
A TinEye reverse image search leads to this article which then cites the original source of the picture.
no, no, I didn't think you did. You have create creative instincts, and I love your shops.
This previous one won the Operation in 2015, and a PSBattles annual award, and was got some serious internet. coverage features in magazines, and blogs world wide. So, a lot of traffic to that operation. It's unusual to get that kind of score for sure.
https://tineye.com/search/2eada04634fbd33ea76b8a61f252592bb399ca14/
I want to say 2008, but I don't know the location. I remember there was outrage at the return of the Black Panthers. This tactic isn't new. They've pulled it multiple times in the past.
Tineye for the win (sadly still no artist name but at least there's a location) https://hypebeast.com/2014/2/pow-wow-hawaii-2014-exploring-the-new-contemporary-movement-honolulu-museum-of-art-school-recap
https://tineye.com/search/d36a139341f917440916fdc0442f26a013e53c41
>It looks like it's been taken with a 21st century camera.
Search 'kodachrome' on Google Images and you'll see that our ancestors where the real inventors of HD.
This is indeed beautifully colorized. I did a reverse image search, seems like this photo has been posted sometime in this sub before, found larger image.
In 2013 i see...
Here it is in a larger version if anyone needed
TinEye found this on rathalox.deviantart.com. That redirects to alyx-xcv.deviantart.com. Hopefully this helps.
Reverse image search worked for me using TinEye. Looking at a higher quality version, the signature says "SYNNESAI". This work isn't on the artist's public pages any longer, according to a very recent comment she made.
Sure we can. We can choose a bigger version of the picture on Tineye https://tineye.com/search/a464c17ca0db6a88615b94648ff0ca2dc90bdb4e
and then flip that in our favorite image editing program, so:
I found an article where CBC admits Merkel and Harper are in complete agreement but show a picture of Merkel scowling at Harper at the top. I'd previously posted it here as 'CBC Bias in 1 Photo' but to counter some /r/Canada nonsense I also tracked down the article it was from and found even more bias. [#CutCBC](/r/CutCBC)
Reverse image search the image and you will find that the Trudeau pic and the Harper pic are completely unrelated yet were combined by CBC to tell this story:
A story that briefly mentions Merkel coming to Canada to update Harper on the Ukraine situation. A situation CBC admits Harper and Merkel were in COMPLETE AGREEMENT on. Does that photo show 'agreement' to you?
Finally, the Harper half of the photo IS NOT EVEN FROM THE TIME PERIOD CBC IS DISCUSSING!! It's apparently from a visit to Europe or something? I followed all the links on Tineye to try to track it down but was unsuccessful.
https://tineye.com/search/e3dc3df85166c1e19325b39ec171940cc5afef1d/
And this is just the stuff reverse image search found. This image is ancient and has been posted dozens of times and has reached the forntpage multiple times.
Always the same fucking title too.
There's a bigger one but you have to follow a chick on Twitter to get it, since it's downloaded. Here's the reverse search.
Couldn't find examples with tineye though, only the unedited image. But then also not the one here, so probably just didn't find it.
And OP is not the first to post this picture here:
http://karmadecay.com/r/OldSchoolCool/comments/5rzqsv/1957_mother_getting_a_ticket_for_wearing_a_bikini/ .
There are even more results on tineye:
https://tineye.com/search/60f84a86026eb01be21d76f2ce829a33ed96544d/?extension_ver=firefox-1.2.2
While none of this exactly proves that the woman in the picture is not OP's mom, I'm still going to call bullshit on this
> It's also most certainly not OP's picture
https://tineye.com/search/008d5fcdfbff102646a866bddd8d8bdd301052da/?sort=size&order=desc
Not saying its not - But it at least have been see around the internet before.
>Yes! That is my understanding of events. If you can prove me wrong I'd honestly appreciate it
You're wrong. That particular sockpuppet was created using a stock photo that's been around at least since 2008.
You're welcome :)
Install the TinEye addon for your browser: If you find an interesting photo online but in small size, you can right click it and use the addon to search for a larger one. That's how I found the larger pic.
I think this might be it.
(copied the part where he looks under the bed, and threw it at TinEye)
You can also click the little camera in the search box, then enter the image link (regardless of browser). (Or use TinEye which first introduced this feature and only supports this way of searching.)
It's a molecular-beam epitaxy (MBE) machine. Here's an article where it was used to build high temperature super-conductors to study spin waves.
^^^^^Thanks ^^^^^tineye
According to Tineye, it's actually from an imgur album from earlier this year, but CollegeHumor did later upload the image along with bits not present in earlier uploads.
This has been posted before a lot, here is some of the recent posts: https://www.reddit.com/r/trashy/comments/7cb4t2/nsfw_multitasker_of_the_year/
Karmadecay somehow didn't find any previous posts, and Tineye doesn't see NSFW posts, but found the image when looking up some user pages, most of them made a comment on an earlier post. Some are from Jul 25:
You can try using TinEye to find images like that. I used it and it found nothing like this specific image, but I use it all the time for other stuff and figured you might be interested in it anyway.
Yeah kinda weird imo, I guess if Twitter removed the tweets it might not show? I was expecting to at least get hits from 4chan or something
https://tineye.com/search/43e33aad0413cc327d5b9a21a9b7630ffa56a809/
I can't watch the hearing but any chance anything about the "Draft Our Daughters" campaign came up?
Sure thing. So we've got this post from yesterday from this person: https://www.reddit.com/r/pics/comments/79igqf/dressed_up_my_newborn_as_a_barista_for_halloween/
A quick pic search with TinyEye shows a couple of results from a year ago: https://tineye.com/search/0d1bd58c1f68fc1c49c4cd843c13e19f29ed51ae/
I think that makes my case.
Yeah this isn't Bambietta, this is "Heidi Von Kreug", an OC that someone probably commissioned Rtenzo to make. Can't find image page but here is the reverse image result.
tineye finds matches back to May of 2014. The oldest match for this image is someone making fun of him.
I'm not sure if you're trying to be genuinely helpful, or just being a pedantic asshat, but giving you the benefit of the doubt here cause I don't want to be assumptive here.
I get that there's a lot of people that don't know how reverse image searching works, though this astonishes me, especially in a sub like this. However, I am not one of those people and had already tried sourcing it myself.
TinEye reverse image search says Arzu Bazman (German actress).
Not to criticize a fellow meguca, but more like a little help for everyone not already aware of this.
You can search for a source of a picture really efficiently with the following tools:
On my phone, so I'll have a proper look at it later. The way these things work is everyone generally browses from the same wholesaler catalogues and rebrands it for their store. If you reverse image search the image on one site, you'll see all the other websites using the same images provided by the wholesaler. Most are too lazy to reshoot the images.
For example:
https://tineye.com/search/b78d9fef293788b5d5b0db2102585d23706dae01/
That's why you'll find a $400 Matt Blatt chair in an eBay store in Hoppers Crossing for $90. Probably out of the same factory.
Tineye says no https://tineye.com/search/5dc82e76835d6056de76e81118f94e860b857eed/?sort=size&order=desc
Google images says yes but the quality is so poor they are probably (badly) upsampled from the small one. Too bad.
hah, at first i thought you were one of those FUCKIN REPOST rage types of people, then I actually looked holy crap cmon people. Get fucking tineye.
Here's a slightly larger version, for those that may want to set this as their phone or wallpaper background.
TinEye didn't find any other sources of the photo. Seems like an original.
https://tineye.com/search/ffeecc7669df9c2a76ebd89c3f51da9b082870b8/
Google Image Search only found this 20hr old Tweet
https://twitter.com/RadGeekpartduex/status/954957604219797505
No idea of when it was taken though.
According to TinEye there appears to be two versions, both originating from some users on a site called topit.me, which appears to be like a chinese version of instagram. Pretty sure you need an account to view the user profiles, so that was as far as I could get. Hope this helps.
lol... liars don't have friends
You found a pic, tried posting it for easy karma, and it backfired. So now what, OP?
somebody shopped it
https://tineye.com/search/c396f51fad2d71e399e9ae8a82d147aa42b3d091/?sort=score&order=desc
they should have added a hoodie, because i suck at it
https://gfycat.com/FarawayLazyEft